Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Here is an idea:
>
> make mdw/mww family of commands a method on the
> target.
>
> foo.cpu mdw => returns array
>
Those exist now (mdw, mdb, mdh) and are intended to display to a human,
nicely formated as hex data
An array version also exists.
The foo.cpu mem2array - T
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:14 AM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 November 2009, Řyvind Harboe wrote:
>> > And what happened to that more standard Tcl model I mentioned a
>> > while back ... a series of interpreters, with the current target
>> > object at the front of the series, and more
On Wednesday 11 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
>
> > On the other hand ... for big things, it's best to avoid
> > turning fuzzy ideas into C. There's a risk of tha fuzziness
> > getting committed, and then getting hard to remove.
>
> Ah, but with git, it can be committed! Refrain from pushing
On Wednesday 11 November 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> > And what happened to that more standard Tcl model I mentioned a
> > while back ... a series of interpreters, with the current target
> > object at the front of the series, and more global stuff back at
> > the end?
>
> I don't understand this
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:26 PM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
>> Please restate this in the form of a problem that needs solving.
>> You have stated a solution. What was the original problem?
>> Are there other possible solutions? How does this solve
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 15:26 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
> > Please restate this in the form of a problem that needs solving.
> > You have stated a solution. What was the original problem?
> > Are there other possible solutions? How does this sol
On Wednesday 11 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
> Please restate this in the form of a problem that needs solving.
> You have stated a solution. What was the original problem?
> Are there other possible solutions? How does this solve it better than
> other alternatives?
And what happened to tha
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 21:49 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>> Here is an idea:
>>
>> make mdw/mww family of commands a method on the
>> target.
>>
>> foo.cpu mdw => returns array
>>
>> write a small mdw proc in Tcl that invokes the above method
>>
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 21:49 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Here is an idea:
>
> make mdw/mww family of commands a method on the
> target.
>
> foo.cpu mdw => returns array
>
> write a small mdw proc in Tcl that invokes the above method
> on the currently active target.
>
> Consider the mrc/mcr ca
Here is an idea:
make mdw/mww family of commands a method on the
target.
foo.cpu mdw => returns array
write a small mdw proc in Tcl that invokes the above method
on the currently active target.
Consider the mrc/mcr case. If we treat it in the same
way, then we're in "c land" when we're trying t
10 matches
Mail list logo
