On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:14 AM, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: > On Wednesday 11 November 2009, Řyvind Harboe wrote: >> > And what happened to that more standard Tcl model I mentioned a >> > while back ... a series of interpreters, with the current target >> > object at the front of the series, and more global stuff back at >> > the end? >> >> I don't understand this idea. How would you deal with a parallel >> object hierarchy, e.g. interface specific commands vs. target >> specific commands. > > Well, "mww" would be for the target, "jtag_khz" would be for > the interface. The series might be > > current target --> interface --> globals
So you're saying that commands generally are methods on target and interface and that the current target and current interface gets to try, in order, a "bare" command as a method on the implied object? > And the "$target foo" versus $interface foo" could be different, > if there were distinct "foo" commands. But then typing the bare "foo" on the telnet ui would always pick the current target. -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
