On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:26 PM, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: > On Wednesday 11 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote: >> Please restate this in the form of a problem that needs solving. >> You have stated a solution. What was the original problem? >> Are there other possible solutions? How does this solve it better than >> other alternatives? > > And what happened to that more standard Tcl model I mentioned a > while back ... a series of interpreters, with the current target > object at the front of the series, and more global stuff back at > the end?
I don't understand this idea. How would you deal with a parallel object hierarchy, e.g. interface specific commands vs. target specific commands. It also sounds like you have more tcl experience than me... >> The fact that you sometimes don't get a response could mean that nobody >> understood what you were talking about. If you make such proposals by >> posting a patch series, the conversation should be more productive. :) > > On the other hand ... for big things, it's best to avoid > turning fuzzy ideas into C. There's a risk of tha fuzziness > getting committed, and then getting hard to remove. Makes sense... No patch series from me anytime soon on this one... -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
