Re: [Openocd-development] Any ideas how OpenOCD should handle virtual addressing and cache coherency?

2009-10-13 Thread Yauheni Kaliuta
hould be added to the trunk as soon as possible, > and it should be in armv7a.c Ok, I'll recheck it. But what do you think about having read/write_phys on target_common_t level? -- WBR, Yauheni Kaliuta ___ Openocd-development mailing list

[Openocd-development] [PATCH] Cleanup: nuke trailling whitespaces

2009-10-13 Thread yauheni . kaliuta
From: Yauheni Kaliuta Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta --- contrib/libdcc/dcc_stdio.c |4 ++-- contrib/libdcc/example.c |6 +++--- ecosflash/flash.c | 12 ++-- src/flash/lpc2900.c|2 +- src/target/arm11.c |2 +- src/target/armv7a.c

Re: [Openocd-development] ADIv5 handling proposal

2009-10-13 Thread Yauheni Kaliuta
Hi! On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Magnus Lundin wrote: > Yauheni Kaliuta wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Magnus Lundin wrote: >> >>> >>> Without looking deeply (lot of other work the coming weeks) I think this >>

[Openocd-development] Do not replace virt2phys with the default one if it was assigned

2009-10-13 Thread Yauheni Kaliuta
From 2cefc67a645ad25c1eba2b6d4e090c4e4583dc03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yauheni Kaliuta Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:27:27 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Do not replace virt2phys with the default one if it was assigned Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta --- src/target/target.c |1 - 1 files changed

Re: [Openocd-development] ADIv5 handling proposal

2009-10-13 Thread Yauheni Kaliuta
Hi! On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Magnus Lundin wrote: > Without looking deeply (lot of other work the coming weeks) I think this > is good, but I would like it in a separate file(module). Called > adiv5_component, adiv5_debug or coresight_component ?? > > So the adiv5 code talks to the MEMAP

[Openocd-development] ADIv5 handling proposal

2009-10-13 Thread Yauheni Kaliuta
Hi! What about implementing more generic access to ADIv5 and APB-AP? I see it like this but what gurus have in mind? From 5e3072d911f89184d159232c0f410c0252161a25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yauheni Kaliuta Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:47:05 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] More abstract interface to

Re: [Openocd-development] Any ideas how OpenOCD should handle virtual addressing and cache coherency?

2009-10-12 Thread Yauheni Kaliuta
Hi! On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Magnus Lundin wrote: > Any ideas how OpenOCD should handle virtual addressing and cache coherency? > [..] > I am planning to implement these for the ARMv7A/CortexA8 and I am > interested in input on what you think should be the behaviour of these > function