On 06/11/2013 03:24 PM, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at
03:09:49PM +0200, Tasslehoff Kjappfot wrote:
>>
>> I have time for one more :)
>>
>> What does it mean that the SDK is relocatable? That I can choose
>> when I run the .sh where I want to install it? Is it then "bound" to
>>
A couple of Qt fixes. These have been tested by Paul Eggleton.
I have fixed some typos in the commit message for Felipe's patch and
dropped the note regarding the build system going crazy as requested by
Paul.
Felipe F. Tonello (1):
qt: update qmake2 class to export qconfig.pri mkspec
Jonathan
From: "Felipe F. Tonello"
This is necessary when Qt applications want to know variables such as
QT_MAJOR_VERSION, QT_VERSION, QT_MINOR_VERSION, GCC version, etc.
Signed-off-by: Felipe F. Tonello
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu
---
meta/classes/qmake2.bbclass | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Remove MAKEFLAGS= from EXTRA_OEMAKE to allow parallel make.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu
---
meta/classes/qmake_base.bbclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/qmake_base.bbclass b/meta/classes/qmake_base.bbclass
index 79040cd..86bbede 100644
--- a/me
On 6/06/2013 3:04 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Wednesday 05 June 2013 17:57:32 Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Wednesday 05 June 2013 09:46:49 Saul Wold wrote:
On 06/05/2013 02:30 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:01:50PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote:
qconfig.pri was not being loaded by
On 06/11/2013 04:00 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 03:39:35PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Jun 11, 2013, at 3:35 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:31:16AM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
* http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57329
Only RFC, because world
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 03:39:35PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>
> On Jun 11, 2013, at 3:35 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:31:16AM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> >> * http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57329
> >
> > Only RFC, because world build is still running to c
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:11:46 -0700
Khem Raj wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2013, at 9:13 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>
> >> what happens if you use --disable-libunwind-exceptions
> >
> > As far as I know we have not tried that. Doesn't this change some of the
> > processing though for systems that use unwi
On Jun 11, 2013, at 3:35 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:31:16AM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
>> * http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57329
>
> Only RFC, because world build is still running to confirm that it
> doesn't introduce new issues and that it indeed fixes p
On Jun 11, 2013, at 3:35 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:31:16AM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
>> * http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57329
>
> Only RFC, because world build is still running to confirm that it
> doesn't introduce new issues and that it indeed fixes p
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:31:16AM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> * http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57329
Only RFC, because world build is still running to confirm that it
doesn't introduce new issues and that it indeed fixes pixman build for
xscalete.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa
* http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57329
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa
---
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.8.inc | 1 +
.../gcc/gcc-4.8/0036-PR-target-56102.patch | 83 ++
2 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtoo
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.8.inc |8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.8.inc
b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.8.inc
index 80bd02c..6664f1c 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.8.inc
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 06/10/2013 04:37 AM, Riku Voipio wrote:
>>
>> On 6 June 2013 16:54, Saul Wold wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06/06/2013 05:08 AM, Riku Voipio wrote:
Patches removed:
0001-doc-Fix-texinfo-table-markup-in-qemu-options.hx.patch
On 06/11/2013 08:41 AM, Andrea Adami wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 06/11/2013 07:14 AM, Andrea Adami wrote:
ping
Maybe you want cramfs in recipes-devtools and not in recipes-support?
Feedback, please
Apologies, we will not accept this recipe being moved into o
Needed for the unittest part of bitbake-selftest can work correctly.
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
---
meta/recipes-core/meta/buildtools-tarball.bb | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/meta/buildtools-tarball.bb
b/meta/recipes-core/meta/buildtools-tarball.bb
index
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 02:13:58PM +0800, qi.c...@windriver.com wrote:
>From: Chen Qi
>
>This patch enables us to split the busybox into two binaries, one
>containing suid applications, and the other containing nosuid apps.
>
>Add a variable, BUSYBOX_SPLIT_SUID, to control whether to split the
>bu
A non-zero status from the march test for gcc means that the "march" flag
is needed. Correct the logic to return True in this case.
Signed-off-by: Randy MacLeod
---
meta/classes/sanity.bbclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass b/meta/
From: Christopher Larson
Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson
---
meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-base.bb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-base.bb
b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-base.bb
in
On Jun 11, 2013, at 9:13 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> what happens if you use --disable-libunwind-exceptions
>
> As far as I know we have not tried that. Doesn't this change some of the
> processing though for systems that use unwind as the only way to generate
> proper back traces?
we already
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:49:32PM +, g...@git.openembedded.org wrote:
> > Module: openembedded-core.git
> > Branch: master
> > Commit: 4ec66dc5f38913056942e1288c0b01a00ea0551f
> > URL:
> http://git.openembedded.org/?p=openembedded-core.g
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:49:32PM +, g...@git.openembedded.org wrote:
> Module: openembedded-core.git
> Branch: master
> Commit: 4ec66dc5f38913056942e1288c0b01a00ea0551f
> URL:
> http://git.openembedded.org/?p=openembedded-core.git&a=commit;h=4ec66dc5f38913056942e1288c0b01a00ea0551f
>
> A
If the same file is installed twice there's a race which can lead to "make
install" failing. Remove the redundant installation of quotaon.service to
eliminate the race.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton
---
.../systemd/systemd/install-quotaon-once.patch | 32
meta/recipes-co
From: Laurentiu Palcu
[YOCTO #4353]
(From OE-Core rev: 8c9c6155e6d83675a94b4eaae4ffc6dfeca399ee)
Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
---
.../menu-cache/files/Fix-segfault.patch| 31 ++
.../menu-cache/menu-cache_0.4.1.bb
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Andrea Adami wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
>> On 06/11/2013 07:14 AM, Andrea Adami wrote:
>>>
>>> ping
>>>
>>> Maybe you want cramfs in recipes-devtools and not in recipes-support?
>>> Feedback, please
>>>
>> Apologies, we will not ac
On 6/10/13 7:21 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
what happens if you use --disable-libunwind-exceptions
As far as I know we have not tried that. Doesn't this change some of the
processing though for systems that use unwind as the only way to generate proper
back traces?
--Mark
On May 31, 2013, at 8:5
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:10:08PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 03:06:35PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > Couple of issues from last email were fixed, so here is updated status:
> >
> > qemuarm Summary: 14 tasks failed:
> > http://logs.nslu2-linux.org/buildlogs/oe/oe-shr-co
On 11 June 2013 16:43, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 08:40 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> yeah now I see the code build is going to build RRECOMMENDS automatically
>> hmm.
>> Do BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS work with rpm ?
>
> I think you mean "with smart", and as far as I know the answer is no.
On 5 June 2013 11:02, Martin Jansa wrote:
> * x86 and x86_64 values were added in
> 8c46ec2edc0197b32d32e0f27d5b60271338b600
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton
Anyone got PPC or MIPS hardware to hand?
Ross
___
Openembedded-
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 08:40 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> yeah now I see the code build is going to build RRECOMMENDS automatically hmm.
> Do BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS work with rpm ?
I think you mean "with smart", and as far as I know the answer is no.
p.
___
O
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 06/11/2013 07:14 AM, Andrea Adami wrote:
>>
>> ping
>>
>> Maybe you want cramfs in recipes-devtools and not in recipes-support?
>> Feedback, please
>>
> Apologies, we will not accept this recipe being moved into oe-core, there is
> not a stron
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 08:22 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
>> > Er, don't RRECOMMENDS always go into the build dependency list?
>>
>> if they do then whats the difference between DEPENDS and R
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 08:22:27AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > Er, don't RRECOMMENDS always go into the build dependency list?
>
> if they do then whats the difference between DEPENDS and RRECOMMENDS
> functionally.
RDEPENDS and RRECOMMENDS
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 08:22 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > Er, don't RRECOMMENDS always go into the build dependency list?
>
> if they do then whats the difference between DEPENDS and RRECOMMENDS
> functionally.
RDEPENDS are required and the pa
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> Er, don't RRECOMMENDS always go into the build dependency list?
if they do then whats the difference between DEPENDS and RRECOMMENDS
functionally.
since now rrecommended packages will always be available and they will
always make into images
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Andy Voltz wrote:
> I understand that. I sent an updated patch which reverts to mtune, but I'm
> getting
mtune/march is small issue with this patch. I would recommend to send
a revert of the patches
since all arm architectures are broken as of now in OE-Core
On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 19:06 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On May 31, 2013, at 7:11 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
> wrote:
>
> > First hit: pci.ids.gz and usb.ids.gz ~350KB in total.
>
> udev just RRECOMMENDS usbutils-ids pciutils-ids so how did it get into build
> time dependencies to begin with ?
Er, d
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Peter Seebach
wrote:
> This got routed to me because the visible error message says
> Execution of "pseudo /bin/bash" failed
>
> but actually it's nothing to do with pseudo. The real
> problem is that the tmux class in terminal.py is producing
> a string li
On 11 June 2013 15:33, Saul Wold wrote:
>> Patching a generated file is prone to conflicts, and we'll be replacing
>> this
>> file anyway when configuring, so drop the Makefile.in hunks.
>>
> Is there any replacement for this patch, did you check that glib-2.0 will
> still build correctly for x32
On 06/10/2013 04:37 AM, Riku Voipio wrote:
On 6 June 2013 16:54, Saul Wold wrote:
On 06/06/2013 05:08 AM, Riku Voipio wrote:
Patches removed:
0001-doc-Fix-texinfo-table-markup-in-qemu-options.hx.patch
- applied
0002-docs-Fix-generating-qemu-doc.html-with-texinfo-5.patch
- fixed differe
ping
Maybe you want cramfs in recipes-devtools and not in recipes-support?
Feedback, please
Andrea
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Andrea Adami wrote:
> Note there would be also the possibility to use the mkfs.cramfs
> provided by util-linux implementing changes in image_types.bbclass and
> uti
On 06/11/2013 04:18 AM, Ross Burton wrote:
Patching a generated file is prone to conflicts, and we'll be replacing this
file anyway when configuring, so drop the Makefile.in hunks.
Is there any replacement for this patch, did you check that glib-2.0
will still build correctly for x32?
Sau!
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> Here's my favorite:
>
>
> DESCRIPTION = "QBall is a simple open source breakout style game"
That's funny! I chose that same app for my test :-)
Steve
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembe
Trying to make a devshell using tmux can fail because "tmux new"
expects a single command, not a series of arguments. It does, however,
split strings in a suitable way. So you can quote the command.
The failure mode is particularly arcane, in that you end up
with a message like:
ERROR: Un
This got routed to me because the visible error message says
Execution of "pseudo /bin/bash" failed
but actually it's nothing to do with pseudo. The real
problem is that the tmux class in terminal.py is producing
a string like:
'tmux new {command}'
This then gets .format called o
On 06/11/2013 07:14 AM, Andrea Adami wrote:
ping
Maybe you want cramfs in recipes-devtools and not in recipes-support?
Feedback, please
Apologies, we will not accept this recipe being moved into oe-core,
there is not a strong case to move it to oe-core, cramfs is a image
type that is not heav
upgrade from 1.5 -> 1.6
Signed-off-by: Andrei Dinu
---
.../gzip/{gzip_1.5.bb => gzip_1.6.bb} |6 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-extended/gzip/{gzip_1.5.bb => gzip_1.6.bb} (48%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/gzip/gzip_1.5.bb
b/m
On 10 June 2013 22:45, Saul Wold wrote:
> create_wrapper changed recently and behaves differently now. It does
> not directly exec the , but exports them, so the first parameter
> needs to be an environemnt variable like a PATH, not a executable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
> ---
> meta/recipes
The following fragment has been added at the end of the licence file:
Copyright (c) 1993, 1994 X Consortium
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
to deal in the Software without restricti
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 04:37:39PM +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
> upgrade from 1.5 -> 1.6
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Dinu
> ---
> .../gzip/{gzip_1.5.bb => gzip_1.6.bb} |4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> rename meta/recipes-extended/gzip/{gzip_1.5.bb => gzi
Hi Khem,
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:12:47AM -0400, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Andy Voltz wrote:
> >> > ERROR: OE-core's config sanity checker detected a potential
> >> > misconfiguration.
> >> > Either fix the cause of this error or at your own risk disable the
> >>
Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu
---
.../{xwininfo_1.1.2.bb => xwininfo_1.1.3.bb} |5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/{xwininfo_1.1.2.bb => xwininfo_1.1.3.bb}
(69%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xwininfo_1.1.2.bb
Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu
---
...-intel_2.21.6.bb => xf86-video-intel_2.21.9.bb} |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-driver/{xf86-video-intel_2.21.6.bb =>
xf86-video-intel_2.21.9.bb} (85%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-d
Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu
---
.../{xdpyinfo_1.3.0.bb => xdpyinfo_1.3.1.bb} |5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/{xdpyinfo_1.3.0.bb => xdpyinfo_1.3.1.bb}
(80%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xdpyinfo_1.3.0.bb
Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu
---
.../drm/{libdrm_2.4.44.bb => libdrm_2.4.45.bb} |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-graphics/drm/{libdrm_2.4.44.bb => libdrm_2.4.45.bb} (46%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/drm/libdrm_2.4.44.bb
b/meta/recipe
Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu
---
...tics_1.7.0.bb => xf86-input-synaptics_1.7.1.bb} |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-driver/{xf86-input-synaptics_1.7.0.bb =>
xf86-input-synaptics_1.7.1.bb} (81%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/
Tests done:
* each package was build tested locally for all architectures (where
applicable);
* ran autobuilder nigthlies for (x86, x86-64, ppc, arm, mips). All completed
successfully;
* no major changes spotted in buildhistory;
* basic functionality tests done on an ideapad s10-3t netbook
Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu
---
...board-config_2.8.bb => xkeyboard-config_2.9.bb} |5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/{xkeyboard-config_2.8.bb =>
xkeyboard-config_2.9.bb} (87%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/xkeyb
upgrade from 1.5 -> 1.6
Signed-off-by: Andrei Dinu
---
.../gzip/{gzip_1.5.bb => gzip_1.6.bb} |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-extended/gzip/{gzip_1.5.bb => gzip_1.6.bb} (51%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/gzip/gzip_1.5.bb
b/met
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 03:09:49PM +0200, Tasslehoff Kjappfot wrote:
>
> I have time for one more :)
>
> What does it mean that the SDK is relocatable? That I can choose
> when I run the .sh where I want to install it? Is it then "bound" to
> that directory, so that every dev that wants to use th
On 06/11/2013 02:43 PM, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
Hi Tasslehoff,
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:35:26AM +0200, Tasslehoff Kjappfot wrote:
I compiled an SDK and extracted/installed it to my source tree
instead of /usr/local/. I have made /usr/local/oecore-i686 a symlink
to the actual location. With the
Hi Laurentiu.
I just saw your mail, but won't have time to investigate until tomorrow.
Just wanted to add one comment.
* denzil did not support relocation and you could only install the sdk in
/usr/local;
In denzil I extracted the SDK to
/home/tasslehoff/src/oe/toolchains/oecore-i686,
Hi Tasslehoff,
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:35:26AM +0200, Tasslehoff Kjappfot wrote:
> I compiled an SDK and extracted/installed it to my source tree
> instead of /usr/local/. I have made /usr/local/oecore-i686 a symlink
> to the actual location. With the latest Dylan this broke.
>
> Denzil:
> ❯❯❯
Patching a generated file is prone to conflicts, and we'll be replacing this
file anyway when configuring, so drop the Makefile.in hunks.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton
---
.../glib-2.0/glib-2.0/glib-2.0_fix_for_x32.patch | 34
1 file changed, 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/m
On 10 June 2013 09:00, Jonathan Liu wrote:
> --disable-glut and --disable-glw are not recognized since Mesa 8.0.
> --disable-glu is not recognized since Mesa 9.0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton
___
Openembedded-core mailing
I compiled an SDK and extracted/installed it to my source tree instead
of /usr/local/. I have made /usr/local/oecore-i686 a symlink to the
actual location. With the latest Dylan this broke.
Denzil:
❯❯❯ ldd arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xf771d000)
libc.so.6 => /lib
On 06/11/2013 12:45 AM, Steve Sakoman wrote:
The qt-apps folder in oe-core only seems to have recipes for qt4-x11-free apps.
Does anyone have a recipe for a simple qt4e app that they would be
willing to share?
I'm looking to get an idea of just how small a qt4e image can be
without climbing the
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:37 AM, zhangxiao wrote:
> Hi Experts,
>
> Currently, YOCTO's nfs-utls is separated into two main packages(RPMs) client
> and server.
> They are not depend on each other. Client has only a mount.nfs user space
> App. With both
> client and server RPMs installed, all works f
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:51:14AM -0700, Felipe Tonello wrote:
>> I got this:
>>
>> valgrind/usr/bin/ms_print
>> 1:#! /usr/bin/perl
>>
>> valgrind/usr/bin/cg_diff
>> 1:#! /usr/bin/perl
>>
>> valgrind/usr/bin/cg_annotate
>> 1:#! /usr/bin/perl
From: Muhammad Shakeel
Some ofono test scripts i.e. enable-modem use python-dbus module
and this must be installed along with ofono-tests package.
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Shakeel
---
meta/recipes-connectivity/ofono/ofono.inc |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
70 matches
Mail list logo
