On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:37 AM, zhangxiao <xiao.zh...@windriver.com> wrote: > Hi Experts, > > Currently, YOCTO's nfs-utls is separated into two main packages(RPMs) client > and server. > They are not depend on each other. Client has only a mount.nfs user space > App. With both > client and server RPMs installed, all works fine. But if we just install > client RPM without > server one, we can only mount nfs server with "-o nolock" for lack of > rpcstatd. > > While in Debian system, it separate nfs-utils with a different way: one > "common" and the > other called server. Common contains mount.nfs and many other Apps including > rpcstatd. > This way the client side(without server RPM install) can mount remote NFS > server in > normal mode. But the side effect is the server RPM depends on the client > one(Debian > calls it as "common").
it seems a sane approach. Patches to restructure the packaging is appreciated. > > On this topic, any opinions on both styles? YOCTO Vs Debian. And, any plan > to modify > YOCTO to align Debian? > > Thanks > Xiao > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
