Hi All
I really look forward eagerly to each upgrade to NetSurf and very much
appreciate the effort put in by the dedicated few, but I am more than a
little baffled by the above modification. What is its purpose, please?
Clearing the background to white and the redraw 'seems' to take ages.
Cheers
In article ,
Steve Fryatt wrote:
> On 13 Feb, Brian Bailey wrote in message
> <51a4df40f4bbai...@argonet.co.uk>:
> > I really look forward eagerly to each upgrade to NetSurf and very much
> > appreciate the effort put in by the dedicated few, but I am more than a
&
In article ,
Steve Fryatt wrote:
> On 13 Feb, Brian Bailey wrote in message
> <51a4df40f4bbai...@argonet.co.uk>:
> > I really look forward eagerly to each upgrade to NetSurf and very much
> > appreciate the effort put in by the dedicated few, but I am more than a
&
In article <513201a551.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>,
Richard Porter wrote:
> On 13 Feb 2011 Michael Drake wrote:
> > In article <51a4df40f4bbai...@argonet.co.uk>,
> >Brian Bailey wrote:
> >> Clearing the background to white and the redraw 'seems
In article <5a1a0ca551.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>,
Richard Porter wrote:
> On 13 Feb 2011 Brian Bailey wrote:
> > In article <513201a551.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>,
> >Richard Porter wrote:
> >> On 13 Feb 2011 Michael Drake wrote:
> >>
I dunno, I couldn't get the bug report page to work for me, I'll probably
get shouted at for doing things this way! 8-)
Actually, bits of that page I couldn't understand.
Clicking a photo image line in URL
http://www.steamtraingallerries.latest_photos.html
I get error message 'serious error' wi
In article <4d6e6e4e.3080...@druck.org.uk>,
David J. Ruck wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 16:09, Brian Bailey wrote:
> > I dunno, I couldn't get the bug report page to work for me, I'll
> > probably get shouted at for doing things this way! 8-)
> [Snip]
In article ,
David Pitt wrote:
> Brian Bailey wrote:
> > I dunno, I couldn't get the bug report page to work for me, I'll
> > probably get shouted at for doing things this way! 8-)
> Yup!
So I see!
> > Actually, bits of that page I couldn't understan
In article <1299097649.22897.1.camel@duiker>,
John-Mark Bell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 16:09 +0000, Brian Bailey wrote:
> > I dunno, I couldn't get the bug report page to work for me, I'll probably
> > get shouted at for doing things this way! 8-)
> &g
In article <37a8e2ad51.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>,
Richard Porter wrote:
> On 2 Mar 2011 Brian Bailey wrote:
> > On 2 Mar 2011 John-Mark Bell wrote:
> >> Unfortunately, the error log you attached is not from the crash, so we
> >> have no useful informati
In article <1299097649.22897.1.camel@duiker>,
John-Mark Bell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 16:09 +0000, Brian Bailey wrote:
> > I dunno, I couldn't get the bug report page to work for me, I'll probably
> > get shouted at for doing things this way! 8-)
> &g
In article <4d6f4f6c.1000...@druck.org.uk>,
David J. Ruck wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 17:20, Brian Bailey wrote:
> > In article<4d6e6e4e.3080...@druck.org.uk>,
> > David J. Ruck wrote:
> >> On 02/03/2011 16:09, Brian Bailey wrote:
> >>> I dunno
In article <1299137718.22897.9.camel@duiker>,
John-Mark Bell wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 06:13 +0000, Brian Bailey wrote:
> >
> > I haven't a clue why that was so, but I have found a copy of the
> > original file which does seem to contain the error report,
In article <20110303091516.ga4...@rjek.com>,
Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 08:57:37AM +0000, Brian Bailey wrote:
> >
> > > It is unacceptable on a text only email list, 'period'.
> >
> > Get off my back, David. What right have
In article <1299186875.22897.12.camel@duiker>,
John-Mark Bell wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 08:59 +0000, Brian Bailey wrote:
> > In article <1299137718.22897.9.camel@duiker>,
> >John-Mark Bell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 06:13 +, Brian Bail
The above version now downloads latest test build as file format &A91 not
Archive/zip (ddc) file which won't open.
In article <381c18b151.zen44...@zen.co.uk>,
Simon Smith wrote:
> In message <51b10f8d4cbbai...@argonet.co.uk>
> Brian Bailey wrote:
> > The above version now downloads latest test build as file format &A91
> > not Archive/zip (ddc) file whic
In article <4d7727ea.5030...@heter.co.uk>,
Philco wrote:
> On 09/03/2011 04:49, Simon Smith wrote:
> > In message<51b10f8d4cbbai...@argonet.co.uk>
> >Brian Bailey wrote:
> >
> >> The above version now downloads latest test build as file
In article ,
David Pitt wrote:
[snip]
> > > >
> > > > > The above version now downloads latest test build as file
> > > > > format&A91 not Archive/zip (ddc) file which won't open.
> > > > a91 is the custom filetype for ZIP, isn't it?
> > > >
> > > > Have you updated or altered your mimemap s
In article <4d775095.30...@druck.org.uk>,
David J. Ruck wrote:
> On 09/03/2011 09:53, Brian Bailey wrote:
> [Mimemap]
> > I've got both the new and the old files open in front of me at the
> > moment and there appear to be significant differences between the two
In article ,
David Pitt wrote:
> Brian Bailey wrote:
>
> > Oh, blazes. This mimemap business is confusing.
> Oh yes.
>
> > I've got both the new and the old files open in front of me at the
> > moment and there appear to be significant differences b
In article <51b33b8d4c...@timil.com>,
Tim Hill wrote:
> In article , Erving
> wrote:
> > From: Brian Bailey Date: 12 Mar 2011
> > > In article , David Pitt
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > snip
> > > > Like this??
&g
http://www.aeseus.com/lists/index.php?p=subscribe&id=1
In article ,
Brian Howlett wrote:
> On 15 Mar, Brian Bailey wrote:
> > http://www.aeseus.com/lists/index.php?p=subscribe&id=1
> Not in r12062...
I agree.
However, that URL is the one that is loaded following a request to access
Aeseus site with personal details to subsc
In article <51b484c89ebbai...@argonet.co.uk>,
Brian Bailey wrote:
> In article ,
>Brian Howlett wrote:
> > On 15 Mar, Brian Bailey wrote:
> > > http://www.aeseus.com/lists/index.php?p=subscribe&id=1
> > Not in r12062...
> I agree.
>
I am intrigued by the successive improvement and development of Netsurf.
Periodically I load a personal favourite page in Wikepedia, just to see
what changes are apparent in performance. It would seem that loading and
rendering of that page does indeed vary.
To what extent can one expect verbose l
In article ,
Kevin Wells wrote:
> In message <51b749bbd1bbai...@argonet.co.uk>
> Brian Bailey wrote:
> >I am intrigued by the successive improvement and development of Netsurf.
> >Periodically I load a personal favourite page in Wikepedia, just to see
>
In article <20110321163550.gg4...@rjek.com>,
Rob Kendrick wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > >I am intrigued by the successive improvement and development of
> > >Netsurf. Periodically I load a personal favourite page in Wikepedia,
> > >just to see what changes are apparent in performance. It would seem
>
In article <1300785359.7641.12.camel@duiker>,
John-Mark Bell wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > > Remove the -v flag. That is what enables verbose logging. Note
> > > that this simply stops NetSurf formatting and emitting the log data.
> > > It will still involve checking "do I need to log this?"
> >
In article <1300871205.7641.16.camel@duiker>,
John-Mark Bell wrote:
[snip]
> > > > I guess that I must accept that my machine /is/ rather slow. But,
> > > > as I am retired I can make endless cups of tea whilst things
> > > > happen. 8-)
> >
> > > I'm not sure you've told us what your machine
Hi Peter
> Just to report that the HSBC on-line baking site appears not to work
> with NetSurf since it changed yesterday. Not a NetSurf bug, merely it
> looks as if it's stuffed with JavaScript. What a pain!
I know, I know, Peter, The NatWest on-line baking site isn't working too
well either!
In article <9a7ec1ba51@nails.abbeypress.net>,
Jim Nagel wrote:
> downloaded and installed r12139 just now.
> glad to see the nice display of a local directory is back.
> it was introduced in Netsurf 2.6 but for some reason had disappeared
> by r12041, but it's back now.
> to see what i m
In article <51baf1ef4ebbai...@argonet.co.uk>,
Brian Bailey wrote:
> In article <9a7ec1ba51@nails.abbeypress.net>,
>Jim Nagel wrote:
> > downloaded and installed r12139 just now.
> > glad to see the nice display of a local directory is back.
> >
Hi John
[snip]
> > Ok. Have you tried Vince's suggestion?
> Thanks for reminding me, Mark. I tried that suggestion some time ago but
> was unable to draw any conclusion. However, I will give it a longer test
> now.
I have being trying that suggestion since your email and there does seem
to be
Hi John
> > [snip]
> >
> >
> > > > Ok. Have you tried Vince's suggestion?
> >
> > > Thanks for reminding me, Mark. I tried that suggestion some time ago
> > > but was unable to draw any conclusion. However, I will give it a
> > > longer test now.
> >
> > I have being trying that suggestion sin
Accessing - Test Builds - NetSurf fails on serious error.
Using A7000+ and RISC OS 4.02
Cheers
> > Accessing - Test Builds - NetSurf fails on serious error.
> >
> > Using A7000+ and RISC OS 4.02
> Not here it didn't, on OS4.04. It did fall over with just that error when
> presented with plain text.
> The latest test build is now 12561, and does not mind text.
Couldn't get past r12551 o
> > Couldn't get past r12551 on the Test Build page and went back to
> > r12505, then accessed Test builds and loaded r12561, which seems to
> > work OK.
> It is worth having a copy of the last stable version to hand, "just in
> case".
> http://www.netsurf-browser.org/downloads/riscos/
I agree
Would some kind soul have a look at Permajet's website www.permajet.com
please. Netsurf doesn't seem to be displaying the page tabs correctly.
Are the tabs really supposed to be like that?
Cheers
> > Would some kind soul have a look at Permajet's website www.permajet.com
> > please. Netsurf doesn't seem to be displaying the page tabs correctly.
> > Are the tabs really supposed to be like that?
> No.
> On Safari 5.1 and Firefox 6.0 on Mac's Lion the upper row of tabs
> 'appear' to be beh
Just a brief observation.
Those microptimisations are showing a discernible, finite improvement in
reducing file loading times on my old, slow machine. Small, certainly, but
an improvement nonetheless.
I load a favourite file every so often to see what effect, if any, the
various updates might b
In article <520e8b1850bbai...@argonet.co.uk>,
Brian Bailey wrote:
> Just a brief observation.
> Those microptimisations are showing a discernible, finite improvement in
> reducing file loading times on my old, slow machine. Small, certainly,
> but an improvement noneth
In article <520eaceb0et...@netsurf-browser.org>,
Michael Drake wrote:
[snip]
> > Later, with r12763, my favourite page in Wikipedia loaded a whole lot
> > faster /except/ a large chunk of the page was missing.
> What's the URL?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dzogchen
Chosen because it usuall
> > > Would some kind soul have a look at Permajet's website
> > > www.permajet.com please. Netsurf doesn't seem to be displaying the
> > > page tabs correctly.
> > > Are the tabs really supposed to be like that?
> > No.
> > On Safari 5.1 and Firefox 6.0 on Mac's Lion the upper row of tabs
> >
In article <52130e5208joh...@ukgateway.net>,
John Williams wrote:
> In article ,
>Richard Porter wrote:
> > Sometimes it just looks as though the tops of the letters on a line
> > have been chopped off but I guess it's the same problem.
> I suggest that might be the problem reported in b
Accessing the testbuilds page gives a serious error and NetSurf then quits.
I remember it did that with r12551!
Cheers
> Accessing the testbuilds page gives a serious error and NetSurf then
>quits.
> I remember it did that with r12551!
Now moved to r13000; error not repeated.
Cheers
Hi guys
I don't know what you doing but I'm getting storming downloads and page
rendering with r13025. Thanks. Keep up the good work.
Cheers 8-)
> Hi guys
> I don't know what you doing but I'm getting storming downloads and page
> rendering with r13025. Thanks. Keep up the good work.
Put very crudely, there seems to be a speed increase of about 30% to
download and render pages with current version. Now using r13044.
Hi
I just got an email from i4imaging which included a file oleO.bmp which
NetSurf didn't like very much declaring BadType as it was fetching and
processing. Said file didn't seem to render. Are bmp file a no go area,
perhaps?
Cheers
John
> > I just got an email from i4imaging which included a file oleO.bmp which
> > NetSurf didn't like very much declaring BadType as it was fetching and
> > processing. Said file didn't seem to render. Are bmp file a no go area,
> > perhaps?
> A BMP file made with DPIngScan loads fine, so your
> > > My BMP file starts with the characters 'BM' as viewed in a text
> > > editor.
> [Snip]
> > If you can't read that file, then either the file is corrupt (easy
> > enough with e-mail) or you haven't got ImageFS (or whatever you use)
> > set up to convert BMP files.
> The OP indicated tha
> > I just got an email from i4imaging which included a file oleO.bmp which
> > NetSurf didn't like very much declaring BadType as it was fetching and
> > processing. Said file didn't seem to render. Are bmp file a no go area,
> > perhaps?
> Could that be because NetSurf is a web browser and isn'
> > I ran the html file which was with the message, which appears as an
> > attchment, in !Pluto, in NetSurf. The BMP file was also an attachment
> > to the message. NetSurf tried to load the file. End of.
> NetSurf has full support for BMP images.
Thanks, John. Noted, but NetSurf clearly doesn
> > I ran the html file which was with the message, which appears as an
> > attchment, in !Pluto, in NetSurf. The BMP file was also an attachment
> > to the message. NetSurf tried to load the file. End of.
> OK. But an html message or web page shouldn't contain BMP images.
On what basis should
> > > 3) Please email me both the HTML and BMP files in question
> >
> > Wilco. Bit busy at the moment, but will get back to you.
> OK. So this has nothing to do with BMP images at all. The bitmap you
> sent me renders fine here.
It does here as well, in retrospect, in ChangeFSI, but originall
In article <52240dc1act...@netsurf-browser.org>,
Michael Drake wrote:
> In article <522408c273bbai...@argonet.co.uk>,
>Brian Bailey wrote:
> > > OK. So this has nothing to do with BMP images at all. The bitmap you
> > > sent me renders fine here.
>
[biggish snip}
> > Not my problem. It was commercial, thus drawing my attention to the
> > event.
> Would there be any point in telling a suit that he's sending out files in
> formats he /perhaps/ shouldn't? Only if you can tell him he's losing
> potential sales.
Well, in a round about way he
[snip]
> It's a long time since I used Pluto, but my recollection is that it
> doesn't treat HTML attachments any differently to any other type of
> attachment: You double click on it, a temporary copy is saved and that's
> filer_run.
> It doesn't parse the HTML in any way to see if any other att
[snip]
> Anyway this is getting off-topic here; should it be continued on the
> MPro list?
Not really, Peter. Well, not yet anyway! For a start I don't use
MessengerPro.
I suspected I would get a response similar to yours.
The problem is that I frequently get messages that are treated by Plut
> When I try and search for text on a web page, the dialogue box accepts
> the first letter and then disappears are searches for just that
> letter.
Exactly the same behaviour here, r13078.
> Does anyone else have this issue? (Iyonix on both 5.16 and 5.17)
4.02
> It works correctly on the def
Please note, error message when accessing
https://riscosopen.org/wiki/documenerror:tation/show/New%20users%27%20FAQ
error:14077458:SSL routines:SSL23__GET_SERVER_HELLO:reason(1112)
In article <522f06c602ch...@chris-johnson.org.uk>,
cj wrote:
> > Please note, error message when accessing
https://riscosopen.org/wiki/documenerror:tation/show/New%20users%27%20FAQ
> > error:14077458:SSL routines:SSL23__GET_SERVER_HELLO:reason(1112)
> I assume the url is not what is given a
>From time to time, when accessing a website, I see Fetching.BadType.
What is the significance of this information, please?
> > From time to time, when accessing a website, I see Fetching.BadType.
> >
> > What is the significance of this information, please?
> >
> I believe it indicates an image which, when fetched, turns out not to be
> the type the server declared it to be (e.g. a GIF served with an image
> type of J
> On 23 Dec 2011 as I do recall,
> Brian Bailey wrote:
> >
> > > > From time to time, when accessing a website, I see
> > > > Fetching.BadType.
> > > >
> > > > What is the significance of this information, please?
>
'serious error' at http://www.trustedreviews.com/images/
> 'serious error' at http://www.trustedreviews.com/images/
Correction. I was in too much of a hurry there in reporting an error.
Several sites were involved doing a Google search, only /one/ of which was
http://www..trustedreviews.com
The log is a available.
Hi John
> > > The log is a available.
> >
> > Please send it to me.
> Fixed in r13365.
Great. Thanks.
> John-Mark.
In article <6162c5f452.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>,
Peter Young wrote:
> I have just downloaded #672 and ran it. I was horrified at the hash it
> made of my homepage, which is http://m.bbc.co.uk/news
> I reverted to #671, and it looks the same there. It renders perfectly
> in Windows Firef
When sending a petition to avaaz.org
http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_frankenfish_r/?blOZUcb&v=21102
NetSurf goes into a loop. alt-break froze the machine necessitating a
ctrl-break re-set.
RISC OS 4.02 A7000+ NetSurf #816
In article <20130118094055.gp15...@pepperfish.net>,
Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 07:53:38AM +0000, Brian Bailey wrote:
> > When sending a petition to avaaz.org
> >
> > http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_frankenfish_r/?blOZUcb&v=21102
> >
&g
> > > When sending a petition to avaaz.org
> > > http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_frankenfish_r/?blOZUcb&v=21102
> > > NetSurf goes into a loop. alt-break froze the machine necessitating a
> > > ctrl-break re-set.
> > > RISC OS 4.02 A7000+ NetSurf #816
> > It works ok here. Iyonix RISC OS 5.18. S
> > > > When sending a petition to avaaz.org
> > > >
> > > > http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_frankenfish_r/?blOZUcb&v=21102
> > > >
> > > > NetSurf goes into a loop. alt-break froze the machine necessitating a
> > > > ctrl-break re-set.
> > > Unfortunately I cannot test this without signing a pet
What, please, is the current status of Flash working with NetSurf?
A search doesn't come up with anything particularly edifying.
My copy is 0.411.1.1 29 Nov 2004
I guess it's a case of don't hold your breath.
> > What, please, is the current status of Flash working with NetSurf?
> The current state is that it will not work (we long ago disabled plugin
> support), and that we're never likely to have it. This isn't so much of
> a problem because Flash is slowly dying off anyway (much like Java).
I see
> > > > > > When sending a petition to avaaz.org
> > > > > >
http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_frankenfish_r/?blOZUcb&v=21102
> > > > > >
> > > > > > NetSurf goes into a loop. alt-break froze the machine necessitating
> > > > > >
> > > I just tried signing another at...
http://www.avaaz.org/en/pe
> > > > > > > When sending a petition to avaaz.org
> > > > > > >
> http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_frankenfish_r/?blOZUcb&v=21102
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > NetSurf goes into a loop. alt-break froze the machine
> > > > > > > necessitating
> > > > I just tried signing another at...
> http://www
I always use,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dzogchen
following each new development version as a test page. Usually there is
never a problem. However, latterly, the lower, horizontal, scrollbar is
significantly compressed with lots of blank page off screen. Everything
else seems to rendered OK.
K
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dzogchen
> > the lower, horizontal, scrollbar is significantly compressed with lots
> > of blank page off screen
> Should be fixed as of CI build #963.
It is and thank very much you for your quick response.
Hi
Of late, when loading Pluto mail with HTML content, sometimes rendering
fails to complete, goes into a loop, and Alt/Break freezes the machine.
A7000+ OS 4.02
In article <53338cd808bbai...@argonet.co.uk>,
Brian Bailey wrote:
> Hi
> Of late, when loading Pluto mail with HTML content, sometimes rendering
> fails to complete, goes into a loop, and Alt/Break freezes the machine.
> A7000+ OS 4.02
Maybe simply lack of patience on m
In article <53340ba4ecjoh...@ukgateway.net>, John Williams
wrote:
> In article <53340a963cbbai...@argonet.co.uk>, Brian Bailey
> wrote:
> > However, I then tried an Alt/Break > Quit on NetSurf, which exited
> > cleanly - except that, trying to restart Net
> > > However, I then tried an Alt/Break > Quit on NetSurf, which exited
> > > cleanly - except that, trying to restart NetSurf gave a message,
> > > 'Cannot open WWW.Netsurf.log for I/O redirection'
[snip]
Just a foot note. please. In examining the NetSurf.log I noticed the
following,
(299.28
Just a small glitch.
Fetching http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dzogchen a JPEG rendered OK but a
PNG didn't, initially. A second attempt at fetching and a re-load, all
JPEG's and PNG's appeared to render successfully.
> #1096
> I included a list of names on a webpage the other day and my co-editor
> doesn't like to see name split across a line. I agree: when lines are
> long a split name looks silly when you can easily place a non-breaking
> space between forename and surname. Browsers know not to split a lin
> > > #1096
> > > I included a list of names on a webpage the other day and my
> > > co-editor doesn't like to see name split across a line. I agree: when
> > > lines are long a split name looks silly when you can easily place a
> > > non-breaking space between forename and surname. Browsers kno
Site
http://www.currys.co.uk/gbuk/gaming/pc-gaming-accessories/pc-gaming-accessories/gaming-mice/logitech-g400-optical-gaming-mouse-11358327-pdt.html
significant differences in NetSurf rendering page from Firefox page
rendering but, in particular, jpeg obscures text.
At Amazon site,
http://www.amazon.co.uk/packaging
Upper part of page, rendering ever so slightly a bit of a shambles.
Seems to be confined to this particular page.
#1276 otherwise appears to be OK.
> >> At Amazon site,
> >> http://www.amazon.co.uk/packaging
> >> Upper part of page, rendering ever so slightly a bit of a shambles.
Repeatable.
> >> Seems to be confined to this particular page.
> >> #1276 otherwise appears to be OK.
> > Seems OK here - I've just had a look at a few Amazon
> > >> At Amazon site,
> > >> http://www.amazon.co.uk/packaging
> > >> Upper part of page, rendering ever so slightly a bit of a shambles.
> Repeatable.
Oh, knickers! Repeatable stopped being repeatable.
Believe me, it was a horrendous mess.
Cheers
> > > >> At Amazon site,
> > > >> http://www.amazon.co.uk/packaging
> > > >> Upper part of page, rendering ever so slightly a bit of a
> > > >> shambles.
> > Repeatable.
Now moved to #1286 and page rendering still a shambles.
However, re-loading the page seems to effect a cure.
https://secure.avaaz.org/en/australian_coal_disaster_global/?blOZUcb&v=27497
With json I get the above message. However with jsoff the article
eventually downloads but the action boxes are inert.
> > The latest build uses the polygon plotter to draw the triangles
> > instead. On some platforms, this means the triangles are no longer
> > anti-aliased.
> That looked dreadful, so I've changed it to generate bitmaps of
> anti-aliased triangles of the appropriate size and colours at runtime.
Any ideas why attempts at running Avaaz URL's nearly always fail, please?
See, for instance,
http://www.avaaz.org/en/petition/Stand_with_the_Philippines/?blOZUcb&v=31098
> > Any ideas why attempts at running Avaaz URL's nearly always fail,
> > please?
> > See, for instance,
http://www.avaaz.org/en/petition/Stand_with_the_Philippines/?blOZUcb&v=31098
> Similar problems here: it takes forever to load the page, clicking
> close on Netsurf's window causes Netsurf t
In article <53c327b25dbrian.jord...@btinternet.com>,
Brian Jordan wrote:
> In article <53c32539bdstuartli...@orpheusinternet.co.uk>,
>lists wrote:
> > Although the home page
> > http://www.arceurotrade.co.uk/default.aspx
> > appears to disply correctly, trying to go to any other page res
97 matches
Mail list logo
