[biggish snip}
> > Not my problem. It was commercial, thus drawing my attention to the > > event. > Would there be any point in telling a suit that he's sending out files in > formats he /perhaps/ shouldn't? Only if you can tell him he's losing > potential sales. Well, in a round about way he was losing potential sales, but not for that reason. I had long ago decided that his product was a total pain. 8-) > Unfortunately there is no easy way (under RISC OS) to reliably create > html attachments with embedded images which work in Pluto/NetSurf, > without wrapping them up in a zip file. Merely attaching a web page and > its images to a message doesn't work: the links in the HTML have to be > correctly written and this is done by windoze and other software if it's > used correctly. I suspect simple attachments were attempted by the > sender. > Not NetSurf's fault. Sorry for long post. No worries, Tim. All grist to the mill.
