In article ,
David Pitt wrote:
> Rod at Orpheusmail, on 26 Mar, wrote:
>> For sometime now NetSurf has been exhibiting colour distortion. At least,
>> I don't know what else to call it. In pictures, contained in html files
>> for example, reds appear blue, as do peoples faces, Pale blue appears
>
In message <59cf38bc5agrov...@orpheusmail.co.uk>
Rod at Orpheusmail wrote:
> For sometime now NetSurf has been exhibiting colour distortion. At least, I
> don't know what else to call it. In pictures, contained in html files for
> example, reds appear blue, as do peoples faces, Pale blu
In article <59cf38bc5agrov...@orpheusmail.co.uk>,
Rod at Orpheusmail wrote:
> For sometime now NetSurf has been exhibiting colour distortion. At
> least, I don't know what else to call it. In pictures, contained in
> html files for example, reds appear blue, as do peoples faces, Pale
> blue app
..
What else has changed? For example, did this start when you switched
to a new version of netsurf, or a new version of your OS, or new
graphics hardware, or any such?
I once saw something very similar with an X program on Linux: all
colours came out with the red and blue primaries switched. In that
For sometime now NetSurf has been exhibiting colour distortion. At least, I
don't know what else to call it. In pictures, contained in html files for
example, reds appear blue, as do peoples faces, Pale blue appears yellow
while dark blue appears brown. And so on...
I don't know what causes this p
I have deleted my choices file, let Netsurf re-create is and then added in a few
missing items:
Is this grey on black text a result of the colour changes ?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/g8/10091729/Fake-shops-open-up-ahead-of-the-G8-summit.html
ca_bundle:./res/cabundle
ca_path:./res
In article <20130529143506.gc19...@kyllikki.org>,
Vincent Sanders wrote:
> For reference the default values are:
> sys_colour_ActiveBorder:d3d3d3
> sys_colour_ActiveCaption:f1f1f1
> sys_colour_AppWorkspace:f1f1f1
> sys_colour_Background:6e6e6e
> sys_colour_ButtonFace:f9f9f9
> sys_colour_Button
In article <57935.82.153.33.53.1369835598.squir...@email.orpheusnet.co.uk>,
Gerald Dodson wrote:
> Following the recent changes and my deletion of ..Choices the colours
> have obviously changed - in the Hotlist in particular. I have looked at
> the User document but not f
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 02:53:18PM +0100, Gerald Dodson wrote:
> Following the recent changes and my deletion of ..Choices the colours have
> obviously changed - in the Hotlist in particular. I have looked at the
> User document but not found any way of changing the colours. How can this
Following the recent changes and my deletion of ..Choices the colours have
obviously changed - in the Hotlist in particular. I have looked at the
User document but not found any way of changing the colours. How can this
be done?
Gerald
Wow! I can now see links on a blue background without recourse to css.
Thanks for implementing that at last.
--
_
|_|. _ Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/
|\_||_mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com
Confidentiality statement: If this isn't for yo
On 26 Aug 2009, Michael Drake wrote:
> In article <1425ee9050.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
>Roger Darlington wrote:
>
>> > Please try r9460.
>
>> But I'm not sure how to do that.
>
> It's a revision number, referring to a development version. You can see
> the revision number in the Info
In article <1425ee9050.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
Roger Darlington wrote:
> > Please try r9460.
> But I'm not sure how to do that.
It's a revision number, referring to a development version. You can see
the revision number in the Info box from the iconbar menu in development
builds.
I m
In article <1425ee9050.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
Roger Darlington wrote:
> >
> > Please try r9460.
> >
> Thanks for a very speedy response Michael.
> But I'm not sure how to do that.
> I can find something saying r9460, but the only thing I can seem to
> download is a short 34kB text
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 16:24 +0100, Roger Darlington wrote:
> On 26 Aug 2009, Michael Drake wrote:
> > In article <21c0569050.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
> >Roger Darlington wrote:
> >
> >> For the last 3 or 4 months, the Test Builds are behaving differently
> >> with regard to the colour o
On 26 Aug 2009, Michael Drake wrote:
> In article <21c0569050.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
>Roger Darlington wrote:
>
>> For the last 3 or 4 months, the Test Builds are behaving differently
>> with regard to the colour of text, when it is in a Frame.
>
> Please try r9460.
>
Thanks for a
In article <21c0569050.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
Roger Darlington wrote:
> For the last 3 or 4 months, the Test Builds are behaving differently
> with regard to the colour of text, when it is in a Frame.
Please try r9460.
--
Michael Drake (tlsa) http://www.netsurf-br
suspect there isn't and that it is Netsurf that is at fault. I
have duplicated the colours because different browsers ignore
different things, so I had to make it so all browsers display the same
colours. They did, until 4 months ago when the new Netsurfs stopped.
All other browsers I
On 6 Jan 2008, Tim Hill wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roger Darlington
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [Snip]
>
>> > Nope, they look okay to me. But wait! Netsurf renders the colours
>> > wrongly and the _always_underlined_links_ are dark
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roger Darlington
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Snip]
> > Nope, they look okay to me. But wait! Netsurf renders the colours
> > wrongly and the _always_underlined_links_ are dark blue, rather than
> > the chosen hue of pale green (see an
ith black backgrounds, then plonk grey text
>> on it... or Dark blue text.
>
> oops www.tightfittheatre.co.uk/index.htm
>
>> In Oregano, If I tick Off the "Use Document colours" the black
>> background is replaced with white and I can see the grey text.
>
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kevin Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>In Oregano, If I tick Off the "Use Document colours" the black background
>>is replaced with white and I can see the grey text.
In Oregano, I do the same with pictures, to kick th
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 14:09 +, Richard Porter wrote:
> On 17 Dec 2007 Daniel Silverstone wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 12:17 +, Richard Porter wrote:
> >>> Rather than spending time nagging us, you could spend that time
> >>> formulating a patch to make NetSurf do this and submit it
On 17 Dec 2007 Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 12:17 +, Richard Porter wrote:
>>> Rather than spending time nagging us, you could spend that time
>>> formulating a patch to make NetSurf do this and submit it to us.
>> If I was a competent ARM/RO programmer I would be more tha
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 12:17 +, Richard Porter wrote:
> > Rather than spending time nagging us, you could spend that time
> > formulating a patch to make NetSurf do this and submit it to us.
> If I was a competent ARM/RO programmer I would be more than happy to
> do so!
Presumably you would gi
On 17 Dec 2007 Rob Kendrick wrote:
> Rather than spending time nagging us, you could spend that time
> formulating a patch to make NetSurf do this and submit it to us.
If I was a competent ARM/RO programmer I would be more than happy to
do so!
--
_
|_|. _ Richard Porter http:/
x27;t implement link colours then you shouldn't implement
> background colours in the body tag, so that contrast can be preserved.
Rather than spending time nagging us, you could spend that time
formulating a patch to make NetSurf do this and submit it to us.
I, alas, have had no time f
On 17 Dec 2007 Michael Drake wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Tim Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nope, they look okay to me. But wait! Netsurf renders the colours wrongly
>> and the _always_underlined_links_ are dark blue, rather than the chosen
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Drake
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tim Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Nope, they look okay to me. But wait! Netsurf renders the colours
> > wrongly and the _always_underlined_li
On 16 Dec 2007, Dave Symes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Got a problem... guess there is an answer but can't seem to find it.
>
> Silly people create sites with black backgrounds, then plonk grey text
> on it... or Dark blue text.
>
> In Oregano, If I tick Off the &qu
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tim Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope, they look okay to me. But wait! Netsurf renders the colours wrongly
> and the _always_underlined_links_ are dark blue, rather than the chosen
> hue of pale green (see any other browser).
NetSur
eate sites with black backgrounds, then plonk grey text
>> on it... or Dark blue text.
> oops www.tightfittheatre.co.uk/index.htm
>> In Oregano, If I tick Off the "Use Document colours" the black
>> background is replaced with white and I can see the grey text.
>
oops www.tightfittheatre.co.uk/index.htm
> In Oregano, If I tick Off the "Use Document colours" the black
> background is replaced with white and I can see the grey text.
Okay, so our text isn't the darkest blue in Netsurf, and there's more
white than grey text. Is
nk grey text on
>>it... or Dark blue text.
>>
>>In Oregano, If I tick Off the "Use Document colours" the black background
>>is replaced with white and I can see the grey text.
> That would be a good idea for Netsurf I think.
>>
>>Is there a comparable
;In Oregano, If I tick Off the "Use Document colours" the black background
>is replaced with white and I can see the grey text.
That would be a good idea for Netsurf I think.
>
>Is there a comparable option in NetSurf? I'm using NS (02 Dec 2007 06:00)
>
A bodge is to h
Got a problem... guess there is an answer but can't seem to find it.
Silly people create sites with black backgrounds, then plonk grey text on
it... or Dark blue text.
In Oregano, If I tick Off the "Use Document colours" the black background
is replaced with white and I can se
36 matches
Mail list logo
