On 21/03/2019 2:16 pm, liweihang wrote:
On 3/19/2019 7:34 PM, liweihang wrote:
Hi all,
I've met a similar issue and sent an email to discuss about it before:
Question about setting speed and duplex failed after
auto-negotiation disabled on marvell phy
d6ab93364734 net: phy: marvell: Avoid u
com;
> cphe...@gmail.com; clemens.gru...@pqgruber.com; n...@nbd.name;
> harini.kata...@xilinx.com
> Subject: Re: regression from: net: phy: marvell: Avoid unnecessary soft reset
>
> On 20.03.2019 13:22, liweihang wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> &g
t;> cphe...@gmail.com; clemens.gru...@pqgruber.com; hkallwe...@gmail.com;
> >> n...@nbd.name; harini.kata...@xilinx.com
> >> Subject: Re: regression from: net: phy: marvell: Avoid unnecessary soft
> >> reset
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3/1
; David S. Miller
>> ; dongsheng.w...@hxt-semitech.com;
>> cphe...@gmail.com; clemens.gru...@pqgruber.com; hkallwe...@gmail.com;
>> n...@nbd.name; harini.kata...@xilinx.com
>> Subject: Re: regression from: net: phy: marvell: Avoid unnecessary soft reset
>>
>>
>&
.@gmail.com; clemens.gru...@pqgruber.com; hkallwe...@gmail.com;
> n...@nbd.name; harini.kata...@xilinx.com
> Subject: Re: regression from: net: phy: marvell: Avoid unnecessary soft reset
>
>
>
> On 3/19/2019 7:34 PM, liweihang wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've
On 20/03/2019 2:39 pm, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
On 20.03.2019 06:16, Phil Reid wrote:
On 20/03/2019 11:37 am, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 3/19/2019 7:34 PM, liweihang wrote:
Hi all,
I've met a similar issue and sent an email to discuss about it before:
Question about setting speed and duplex f
On 20.03.2019 06:16, Phil Reid wrote:
> On 20/03/2019 11:37 am, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/19/2019 7:34 PM, liweihang wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've met a similar issue and sent an email to discuss about it before:
>>> Question about setting speed and duplex failed after auto-negotiatio
On 20/03/2019 11:37 am, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 3/19/2019 7:34 PM, liweihang wrote:
Hi all,
I've met a similar issue and sent an email to discuss about it before:
Question about setting speed and duplex failed after auto-negotiation disabled
on marvell phy
d6ab93364734 net: phy: marvell:
hkallwe...@gmail.com;
>> n...@nbd.name; harini.kata...@xilinx.com
>> Subject: Re: regression from: net: phy: marvell: Avoid unnecessary soft reset
>>
>> On 20/03/2019 12:53 am, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 3/18/19 6:32 PM, Phil Reid wrote:
>>>> On 19/03/20
vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Andrew Lunn ; David S. Miller
> ; dongsheng.w...@hxt-semitech.com;
> cphe...@gmail.com; clemens.gru...@pqgruber.com; hkallwe...@gmail.com;
> n...@nbd.name; harini.kata...@xilinx.com
> Subject: Re: regression from: net: phy: marvell: Avoid unnecessary soft reset
&
On 20/03/2019 12:53 am, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 3/18/19 6:32 PM, Phil Reid wrote:
On 19/03/2019 1:09 am, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 3/17/19 7:11 PM, Phil Reid wrote:
On 16/03/2019 5:58 am, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 3/15/19 1:52 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
G'day All,
I've just update from kerne
On 3/18/19 6:32 PM, Phil Reid wrote:
> On 19/03/2019 1:09 am, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 3/17/19 7:11 PM, Phil Reid wrote:
>>> On 16/03/2019 5:58 am, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 3/15/19 1:52 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
> G'day All,
>
> I've just update from kernel 4.19 to 5.0 on a custo
On 19/03/2019 1:09 am, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 3/17/19 7:11 PM, Phil Reid wrote:
On 16/03/2019 5:58 am, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 3/15/19 1:52 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
G'day All,
I've just update from kernel 4.19 to 5.0 on a custom board that has a
marvell
dsa mv88e6085 and the phy on the mv8
> I'm using a Marvell 88E6161 with 5.0.1 and I get the following output
> which I think indicates that the 6161 does not use the 1540 PHY:
Correct. Maybe it is the 6172? I know it is one of the devices i have.
Yes, i mv88e6172 uses 88E1540.
Andrew
> Some of the older Marvell switches use the 1540 for its internal
> PHYs. Same OUI as the external PHY. I don't remember which
> switches. Maybe the mv88e6161 in the RDU1?
>
I'm using a Marvell 88E6161 with 5.0.1 and I get the following output
which I think indicates that the 6161 does not use th
> Thanks, you mentioned a mv88e6085 but that chip is a 10/100 switch, did
> you mean that the mv88e6085 compatible string is used in Device Tree to
> designate that chip? While the 88E1540 driver is picked up, that driver
> is originally for external PHY packages (AFAICT), so there could be some
>
On 3/17/19 7:11 PM, Phil Reid wrote:
> On 16/03/2019 5:58 am, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 3/15/19 1:52 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
>>> G'day All,
>>>
>>> I've just update from kernel 4.19 to 5.0 on a custom board that has a
>>> marvell
>>> dsa mv88e6085 and the phy on the mv88e6085 will only connect at
On 16/03/2019 5:58 am, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 3/15/19 1:52 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
G'day All,
I've just update from kernel 4.19 to 5.0 on a custom board that has a
marvell
dsa mv88e6085 and the phy on the mv88e6085 will only connect at 10Mb/s with
the above mentioned patch applied.
Bisecting
On 3/15/19 1:52 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
> G'day All,
>
> I've just update from kernel 4.19 to 5.0 on a custom board that has a
> marvell
> dsa mv88e6085 and the phy on the mv88e6085 will only connect at 10Mb/s with
> the above mentioned patch applied.
>
> Bisecting the issue lead me to the following
19 matches
Mail list logo
