Re: regional ASN's

You can use one AS and communities to seperate your traffic/policies. -jim --Original Message-- From: Ryan Finnesey To: NANOG list Subject: regional ASN's Sent: Dec 1, 2010 1:13 PM I see various people are recommending networks setup regional ASN's. I am in the process of setting up a ne

Re: NTP DRDos Blog post

Re: A simple proposal

You shouldn't of stopped them I was eagerly ‎ waiting to find out how rtt was going to be increased :) -jim Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.   Original Message   From: Suresh Ramasubramanian Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 11:26 PM To: Phil Fagan Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subjec

Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix

I've only been 1/2 paying attention, did I miss the tag are are people really looking for those answers. -jim Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.   Original Message   From: Miles Fidelman Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2014 6:11 PM Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: Verizon Public Policy

Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics

I have worked for more then one transit free network, and have work with people from (most) of the rest, we always prefer cust over peer, every time. -jim Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network -Original Message- From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 09

Re: IP Management Software

Not to be a bandwagon jumper but +1 for 6connect as well. --Original Message-- From: Mike Walter To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: IP Management Software Sent: Dec 16, 2011 4:42 PM +1, agree on 6connect.net. -Original Message- From: Rafael Rodriguez [mailto:packetjoc...@gmail.com

Re: guys != gender neutral

Maybe one of the folks here there aren't laywers but likes to give legal advice, that covers the use of male language to be for shortness in responses and no way indicate gender bias so we can all get back to talking about network :( Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Netwo

Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...]

I wonder if lawyer sit around all day and argue about CIDR notation Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.   Original Message   From: Jim Richardson Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 7:26 PM Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 a

Re: Someone’s Been Siphoning Data Through a Huge Security Hole in the Internet

Re: comcast enterprise/carrier services

I'm wondering how can someone recomend a vendor for X be diffrent from, Can someone recond a box that does Y. I'm no fan of blind calls from sales droids anymore more then the next person but I see this posting as relevant or more then many post here. --Original Message-- From: Scott We

Re: Surcharge for providing Internet routes?

I've never heard of this either. -jim --Original Message-- From: aa...@wholesaleinternet.net To: ML To: nanog@nanog.org ReplyTo: aa...@wholesaleinternet.net Subject: Re: Surcharge for providing Internet routes? Sent: May 1, 2010 6:00 PM Never heard of it. We don't do it. --Original

Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it?

I've worked for a couple of very large providers. I can't speak for what the do they do today but both where very serious about proper filtering. I only hope they both still do it. -jim --Original Message-- From: Hank Nussbacher To: Thomas Magill Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Securi

Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it?

I don't suspect we'd need a central authority for that. I'm sure it only enough for you traffic to pass with anyones national boundry to be 'at risk' of such things -jim Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network -Original Message- From: Larry Sheldon Date: Mon, 10

Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it?

Ziad, I agree, its unfortunate that so many people no longer require route registration. Not that it would solve all the issues. Tom School, Todd Underwood and I present some work we did looking @ this @ nanog in LA a while back. Unfortunately we could never find time to take it to the next

Re: Strange practices?

Should work fine. --Original Message-- From: Dale Cornman To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Strange practices? Sent: Jun 7, 2010 5:50 PM Has anyone ever heard of a multi-homed enterprise not running bgp with either of 2 providers, but instead, each provider statically routes a block to their co

Re: Todd Underwood was a little late

I just checked all those /8's none of them are in the table. -jim Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network -Original Message- From: Michael Dillon Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:39:07 To: Lee Howard Cc: ; Todd Underwood Subject: Re: Todd Underwood was a little late " "R

Re: off-topic: summary on Internet traffic growth History

I think for most of us iMCI'ers its a very big diffrence that iMCI != MCIWorldcom -jim Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network -Original Message- From: "Jeffrey S. Young" Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:26:29 To: John Lee Cc: nanog@nanog.org; Andrew Odlyzko Subject: Re:

Re: ISP port blocking practice

Having worked in past @ 3 large ISPs with residential customer pools I can tell you we saw a very direct drop in spam issues when we blocked port 25. -jim Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network -Original Message- From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 17

Re: Facebook Issues/Outage in Southeast?

Having issues from the north east as well. --Original Message-- From: Ernie Rubi To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Facebook Issues/Outage in Southeast? Sent: Sep 23, 2010 4:39 PM Anyone else having trouble? We're colo'ed at the NOTA in Miami and directly peer with them - even though our sessio

Re: AS11296 -- Hijacked?

From: Rich Kulawiec Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:25:20 To: Subject: Re: AS11296 -- Hijacked? On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 08:38:17AM -0300, jim deleskie wrote: > WOW full of yourself much. Many of us use gmail and others to manage the > load of mail we received from various lists. I doubt w

Re: Local Peering and Transit - BGP multihoming

Google BGP Cisco... Should give you 90% of this. --Original Message-- From: ty chan To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Local Peering and Transit - BGP multihoming Sent: May 22, 2009 2:23 AM Dear all, In my lab, i manage two ASN (100,200). ASN100 has one transit to ASN300 and local peering to A

Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.

Roland, The only issue I have I with your reply is that is somehow still acceptable to not have these features in a core device. -jim --Original Message-- From: Roland Dobbins To: NANOG list Subject: Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. Sent: Jul 18, 2009 1:09 AM On Jul 18, 200

Re: cisco.com

Facebook up. Cisco down. From eastern canada --Original Message-- From: Alex Nderitu To: R. Benjamin Kessler Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: cisco.com Sent: Aug 4, 2009 10:42 AM Facebook seems to also be affected. -Original Message- From: R. Benjamin Kessler To: nanog@nanog.or

Re: cisco.com

So cisco has no BGP is that what I'm hearing... Oh the irony :) --Original Message-- From: Aaron Millisor To: R. Benjamin Kessler Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: cisco.com Sent: Aug 4, 2009 10:45 AM Not sure the ETA but the network that the address for cisco.com resolves to (198.133.219.

Re: Anyone else seeing "(invalid or corrupt AS path) 3 bytes E01100" ?

I'd have to _assume_ that a lot of those impacted don't have a maint contract with their router vendor of choice and therefore don't have an easy path to upgrade. -jim --Original Message-- From: Jared Mauch To: randal k Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Anyone else seeing "(invalid or corr

Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband

andle Oklahoma summers or > draw too much power. > > Brings up new PRO: active devices in the OSP providing longhaul > redundancy on fiber rings > > Another PRO: simple, inexpensive NID > > Jack > > Robert Enger - NANOG wrote: >> CON: active devices in the OS

Re: Issues with Gmail

Working on my BB here. Acct with rogers in canada but right now on ATT in Vegas --Original Message-- From: Jeff Kell To: m...@sabbota.com Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Issues with Gmail Sent: Sep 1, 2009 4:25 PM m...@sabbota.com wrote: > I think it just may be front end services that ar

Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for bottedclients

Sounds great but who cover the costs? --Original Message-- From: Peter Beckman To: Gadi Evron Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for bottedclients Sent: Oct 3, 2009 7:18 PM On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, Gadi Evron wrote: > The story is covered by PC mag: Tha

Re: Does Internet Speed Vary by Season?

Maybe I'm way off.. Maybe its view of KISS but as engineers we should all be looking for the simplest answer. To me they key in Dragos' post was usage. All physics aside, the warm weather (seasonal) people go out more, use the internet less. In cold months, we stay in, use the net more. As for

Re: What should ISPs ASPs MSPs xSPs do?

I always make the assumption that I'm on my own and now one will help. If they do GREAT if not, sucks to be but I'm prepared. In a perfect world we all help others, but if the people paying any givens person paycheck have other issues tasked to higher priority levels then I can blame or fault th

Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3

Having worked for seveal SP's 'tier 1' and otherwise along with a couple of router vendors IMO MT is one of those thing people ask for just in case. Sure we _could_ always find a use for it, but we don't always look at the potential diffrent IGP topologies are going to cause for our NOC staff @

Re: Ethical DDoS drone network

Super risky. This would be a 99% legal worry plus. Unless all the end points and networks they cross sign off on it the risk is beyond huge. -jim --Original Message-- From: Jeffrey Lyon Sender: To: na...@merit.edu Subject: Ethical DDoS drone network Sent: Jan 4, 2009 10:06 PM Say for

Re: Ethical DDoS drone network

If the drones send a few packets a seconds even say 1000's of pkts per second its value is not likely to be very meaningful, atleast no more so then building an on net resourse. To be meaningful you'd want/need something that could simulate a DDoS. Maybe my assumptions are way off base. You'

Re: Anyone notice strange announcements for 174.128.31.0/24

This was a test using unassigned IP block, unless I'm reading it wrong. If a noc alerted on this it should have still be a low priority issue. I don't see any issues with the way this was carried out at all. -jim --Original Message-- From: Michienne Dixon To: NANOG list Subject: RE: An

Re: switch speed question

Switches like this and the force10 2410 and the like are cut through so do sub micro second versus a 'regular' store and forward switch --Original Message-- From: Holmes,David A To: Deric Kwok To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: switch speed question Sent: Feb 24, 2009 1:03 PM Arista claims

Re: Outside plant protection, fiber cuts, interwebz down oh noes!

Not to turn this into an ethical typ discussion but this arguement would have to assume you could sue the telco not the 'vandal' due to a loss of life if it occured, and that, that dollar amt would be greater then 'securing' all cables. The cost to fix all pintos' gas tanks was only $11 per c

Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook?

Maybe I'm wrong on this, and I'm not a mailadmin anywhere nor have I been or pretended to have been in the past. But I'm pretty sure FB only sends you mail based on the prefrences you choose, and I know this is the answer you where given so mostly a statement. How does that equal spam :) --O

Re: CRS-3

What happened to CRS-2? :) --Original Message-- From: Robert Enger - NANOG To: David Hubbard Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: CRS-3 Sent: Mar 9, 2010 4:20 PM Forget Linksys: Didn't Peter Lothberg's mom have a CRS1 in her basement already? :-) She said it was great for drying her clothe

Re: Network / Infrastructure security testing services

Your asking if anyone does it or your offering your services? -jim On Tue., Mar. 9, 2021, 3:56 p.m. Nathanael Cariaga, wrote: > Apologies for this shameless plug, but wanted to ask if any folks on this > list who does network/infrastructure security testing? Please to reach back > to me off the

Re: DDoS attack with blackmail

While I have no design to engage in over email argument over how much latency people can actually tolerate, I will simply state that most people have a very poor understanding of it and how much additional latency is really introduced by DDoS mitigation. As for implying that DDoS mitigation compan

Re: Any2 LAX

Also saw a major traffic drop. There is a Root Cause to be issued early in the week I'm told. -jim On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 2:42 PM Siyuan Miao wrote: > Yea, it was down but both RS are online and feeding us unreachable > nexthops during the outage . > > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 1:27 AM Seth Mat

Re: Cogent x RPKI

It won't get them depeered, nor should it. I don't currently based much value in RPKI for BGP. On Mon., Aug. 9, 2021, 8:43 a.m. Rubens Kuhl, wrote: > From a Cogent support ticket: > "Hello, > > Please see the attached LOA. > > Regarding the RPKI ROA, for now, we don't create ROA for our prefixe

Re: netflow in the core used for surveillance

Randy, We all know many folks send their *flow to someone or somewhere. In exchange for pretty graphs for intelligence. I suspect in many cases this data is then reused in many cases for many purposes. But let's not overplay the risk here. There would be much easier ways for rogue nations, b

Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test

I remember having this discussion more than 20yrs ago, minus the ARIN bit, couldn't get every to agree to it it then either :(. We don't need more rules, we just need to start with basic hygiene. Was a novel idea :) On Mon., Apr. 20, 2020, 2:41 p.m. Christopher Morrow, < morrowc.li...@gmail.com> w

Re: do bgp optimizers think?

Suspect for most th answer is poorly. This is a conversation I've had with a few people about how they could be well made -jim On Thu., Sep. 9, 2021, 12:45 p.m. Randy Bush, wrote: > to control inbound traffic, how do bgp optimizers decide how to tune > what they announce? slfow? exploration?

Re: S.Korea broadband firm sues Netflix after traffic surge

Having done peering for many $big_boys_club and $small_isps, it always comes down to politics, $$ and time. The balance may change but end of day its those variables and its a painful game some days. From all sides :( -jim On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 1:07 PM Laura Smith via NANOG wrote: > > > The

Re: Disaster Recovery Process

World broke. Crazy $$ per hour down time. Doors open with a fire axe. Glass breaks super easy too and much less expensive then adding 15 min to failure. -jim On Tue., Oct. 5, 2021, 7:05 p.m. Jeff Shultz, wrote: > 7. Make sure any access controlled rooms have physical keys that are > available

Re: Disaster Recovery Process

I don't see posting in a DR process thead about thinking to use alternative entry methods to locked doors and spreading false information. If do well. Mail filters are simple. -jim On Tue., Oct. 5, 2021, 7:35 p.m. Niels Bakker, wrote: > * deles...@gmail.com (jim deleskie) [Tue 05

Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public

This is actually worse than our collective progress on replacing v4 to date. -jim On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 7:31 PM Jay R. Ashworth wrote: > This seems like a really bad idea to me; am I really the only one who > noticed? > > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-127-00.html > > Th

Re: Contact request AS 6453

Have you found anyone. Not there any more but can probably still find someone for you. -jim On Thu, Jan 13, 2022, 10:11 AM Drew Weaver wrote: > Does anyone have a contact for AS 6453 or are there any AS 6453 folks on > list? > > > > Seeing some routing trouble from their customers to the US. >

Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions

I respect the people and goals here, but strongly echo Mel's statement. This is a much larger hammer then mail filtering lists. -jim On Thu, Mar 10, 2022, 11:26 AM Mel Beckman wrote: > In my view, there is a core problematic statement in this document: > > “Military and propaganda agencies and

Re: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain

Terrible idea on so many levels. -jim On Mon, Mar 14, 2022, 12:30 PM Patrick Bryant wrote: > I don't like the idea of disrupting any Internet service. But the current > situation is unprecedented. > > The Achilles Heel of general public use of Internet services has always > been the functionali

Re: IPv6 Only - was Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC

If then industry still hasn't adopted v6 full in 25 years maybe it's v6 that should be given up it, that it clearly wasn't what customers wanted. Perhaps we should should have a small group working on the next iteration. -jim On Tue, Mar 29, 2022, 5:54 PM Jacques Latour wrote: > So, in 25, 50 o

Re: Opinions on Arista for BGP?

I did an eval for some folks last Aug on Arista and 2 other vendors, one of the others decided they didn't want to play the 3rd did. Of the 3 Arista performed better/best. The test plan was shared with all 3 vendors prior to testing and it definitely push all this to and then past their published

Re: 10 Do's + Don'ts for Visiting Québec + Register Now for N85!

Having lived in and continue to spend as much time in Montreal as I can. This list made be laugh, especially for a group where most of us do a lot of travel. Other then no right on red. Montreal like any other city. Don't be an ass and enjoy yourself. On Thu, May 5, 2022, 9:56 AM Nanog News

Re: Rogers Outage Canada

i cant see BGP taking out SS7. -jim On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 2:45 PM Snowmobile2004 wrote: > According to Cloudflare Radar > , Rogers > BGP announcements spiked massively to levels 536,777% higher than normal > (343,601 vs 64 normall

Re: AKAMAI Contact

Seriously search the list people. Even a little effort on your own. Same question a few days ago. -jim On Wed, Sep 28, 2022, 3:45 PM Joshua Pool via NANOG wrote: > Anyone have a contact for AKAMAI? > > Thanks in advance. > > Josh >

Re: Understanding impact of RPKI and ROA on existing advertisements

I dont think ive every agreed with Owen this much, maybe this is the first sign the wording is ending further proving his statement :) On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 10:30 PM Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: > Oh, I’m not ignoring it, I’m just rather underwhelmed by it and given how > long it took SIDRWG to

Re: TATA Communications

Have you tried NOC not sure who from their actively monitors the list anymore? Forwarding to a former colleague. -jim On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 2:49 PM Norman Jester wrote: > Contact me off list... seeing major loss at 64.86.252.65 in your path. > > Norman Jester > 619-319-7055 >

Re: modeling residential subscriber bandwidth demand

+1 on this. its been more than 10 years since I've been responsible for a broadband network but have friends that still play in that world and do some very good work on making sure their models are very well managed, with more math than I ever bothered with, That being said, If had used the methods

Re: modeling residential subscriber bandwidth demand

lso to allow for spikes in traffic for various events > throughout the year. > > Louie > Google Fiber > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:36 AM jim deleskie wrote: > >> +1 on this. its been more than 10 years since I've been responsible for a >> broadband network

Re: DOs and DONTs for small ISP

triggered :) On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 11:31 AM Bryan Holloway wrote: > > On 6/4/19 9:20 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > > > > On 3/Jun/19 15:41, Fletcher Kittredge wrote: > >> > >> Here is your checklist in descending order of importance: > >> > >> 1. market opportunity > >> 2. finding the right pa

Re: Disney+ Geolocation issues

Using a TPIA provider here at home in Nova Scotia same issue. -jim On Tue., Nov. 12, 2019, 6:29 p.m. Michael Crapse, wrote: > Myself and a few other ISPs are having our eyeballs complain about > disney+ saying that they're on a VPN. Does anyone have any idea, or who to > contact regarding this

Re: BGP FlowSpec

I was going to avoid this thread because I've never been a huge fan of Flowspec for my own reasons. However having work on /been responsible for several "Tier 1 and 2" networks and DDoS mitigation services over the last 20 years, I can say I, nor any of my peers ( in any sense of that word) that

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

I don't suspect many folks that are outside of this list would likely have any idea how to set up a v6 tunnel. Those of us on the list, likely have a much greater ability to influence v6 adoption or not via day job deployments then Netflix supporting v6 tunnels or not. On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:49

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

Damian, I HIGHLY doubt regular folks are running into issues with this, I suspect its not even geeks in general having issues, I suspect 80% plus of those having issues spend most of their time complaining about something related to v6 and the rest of the geeks not loving them/it enough. -jim On

Re: cross connects and their pound of flesh

I don't buy this. They sold you one cable before, they sell you cable now. Little difference then we moved customers from a T1 to T3 back in the 90's. If Colo's can't understand more then 20+ yrs of evolution its hardly right to blame it on the market. -jim Mimir Networks www.mimirnetworks.c

Re: cloudflare hosting a ddos service?

sigh... On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > CloudFlare will claim they are not hosting the problem. They are just > hosting the web page that lets you pay for or points at or otherwise > directs you to the problem. > > The actual source of packets is some other IP addre

Re: cloudflare hosting a ddos service?

Back in the day didn't we refer to such hosting as bulletproof hosting? On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Phil Rosenthal wrote: > Plus, it’s good for business! > > -Phil > > > On Jul 26, 2016, at 10:14 PM, jim deleskie wrote: > > > > sigh... > > > &

Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology

I struggled with this whole SDN/NVF/insert marketing term for a while at first, until I sat down and actually though about. When I strip away all the foo, what I'm left with is breaking things down to pieces and and putting logo blocks together in a way that best suits what I'm doing. It is reall

Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?

Redirecting someone's traffic, with out there permission or a court order, by a court in your jurisdiction, not a lot different then the "bad guys" themselves. On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote: > Hopefully this is operational enough, though obviously leaning more > towards

Re: Krebs on Security booted off Akamai network after DDoS attack proves pricey

They were hosting him for free, and like insurance, I can assure you if you are consistently using a service, and not covering the costs of that service you won't be a client for long. This is the basis for AUP/client contracts and have been going back to the days when we all offered only dialup i

Re: Krebs on Security booted off Akamai network after DDoS attack proves pricey

Not at all. I refered to AUP's as a way people remove you from a service when you use more of it then you are paying for. On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Marcin Cieslak wrote: > On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, jim deleskie wrote: > > > They were hosting him for free, and like insurance,

Re: Krebs on Security booted off Akamai network after DDoS attack proves pricey

Sorry but you are mistaken. I've worked at Sr. levels for several LARGE and medium sized networks. What does it cost and what do we make doing it, over rules what is "good for the internet" every time it came up. On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Ca By wrote: > On Sunday, September 25, 2016, Joh

Re: Krebs on Security booted off Akamai network after DDoS attack proves pricey

ck proves pricey > From: jim deleskie > Sorry but you are mistaken. I've worked at Sr. levels for several LARGE and > medium sized networks.  What does it cost and what do we make doing it, > over rules what is "good for the internet" every time it came up. "nice

Re: Legislative proposal sent to my Congressman

Can we please not get the government ( who's gov ) involved. I fully agree that it will not only not help, but will make some things worse. This is why we can't have nice things. On Tuesday, October 4, 2016, Anne Mitchell wrote: > (Interesting and inarguably well-intentioned, and possibly even

Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11

It is also likely the desired use case. In my office I like to be able to login when needed when on the road, when the alarm company calls me at 2am for a false alarm so I don't have to get someone else out of bed to have them dispatched to check on the site. -jim On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 1:42 PM

Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11

y iPhone* > > On Oct 22, 2016, at 12:06 PM, jim deleskie wrote: > > It is also likely the desired use case. In my office I like to be able to > login when needed when on the road, when the alarm company calls me at 2am > for a false alarm so I don't have to get someone else

Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11

Sure lets sue people because they put too many/bad packets/packets I don't like on the internet. Do you think this will really solve the porblem? Do you think we'll not just all end up with internet prices like US medical care prices? On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 4:41 PM, wrote: > > >So once identi

Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11

I've heard this crap for 20+ years now. "attack traffic" is unplanned traffic. Build networks to support "random" bursts of garbage is much more expensive then you will ever get to bill for. You clearly have no understanding of the economics of networks. On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Keith

Re: Spitballing IoT Security

So device is certified, bug is found 2 years later. How does this help. The info to date is last week's issue was patched by the vendor in Sept 2015, I believe is what I read. We know bugs will creep in, (source anyone that has worked with code forever) Also certification assuming it would work,

Re: BFD on back-to-back connected BGP-speakers

Hugo, I've used this configuration in a past line when I may of had multiple L2 steps between L3 devices. The only concern we had was around load BFD put on _some_ endpoint routers, if was handles on the RouteProcessor vs on line cards. -jim On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Hugo Slabbert wr

Re: Canadian National Railway contact

Have a friend that used to work there, will reach out to see if he still does. -jim On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote: > If there happens to be someone here from the Canadian National Railway, or > if someone knows someone there, could you hit me up off-list? > > Attempting

Re: Rogers Peering Request

Will reach out to some folks I know there. PM me Network, AS etc. On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Ryan Gard wrote: > Looking for a Rogers contact to get things moving on a peering request. > Been trying to shout into their ear for well over a month, and haven't > heard anything back. Further, P

Re: [OT] Internet in China

Chinese ISP's typically like to run their links very hot. Don't expect much different if you change providers. -jim On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 8:37 AM, Danijel Starman wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone suggest a reliable internet provider in China? Are all > options China Telecom? > > Some current lin

Re: Service Provider NetFlow Collectors

Erik, Feel free to ping me, I own Mimir Networks, we have a full-service flow collection/DDoS detection and mitigation system that I'd love to show you. We built it having been a long time user of other commercial and open source tools, for very large deployments. Would be happy to give you a f

Re: Out of ideas - Comcast issue BGP peering with Tata

I many years ago worked at Tata, responsible for their BGP, they are giving you the right answer, Comcast has to be the one contacting them, as then both sides can see what is being sent and received and can resolve this issue. -jim On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 10:04 AM Jamie Chetta via NANOG wrote:

Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute?

Not even the first time tata and cogent separated. Will avoid public details but I was on the keyboard at 6453 that time. On Fri, May 17, 2024, 6:05 PM William Herrin wrote: > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 9:55 AM Ben Cartwright-Cox via NANOG > wrote: > > Also poking around on RIPE Atlas suggests th

Re: Long AS Path

I see 5+ prepends as maybe not reason to have your "BGP driving license revoked" but if I can continue with the concept that you have your BGP learners permit. If I think back to when I learned to code or when making ACL's, we still used line number and practice would be to give ourselves lots of

Re: Bell outage

Cell and the internet all down here from Bell and those sharing their towers, also 911 services. Banking / ATM also impacted, no idea reason though. -jim Mimir Networks www.mimirnetworks.com On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Krunal Shah wrote: > Does anyone know what is happening with Bell net

Re: Bell outage

Single fiber cut causes the much impact? -jim On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:59 PM, J wrote: > https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/much-of- > atlantic-canada-loses-cellphone-service-in-widespread-outage/ > article35881182/ > > > > Apparently some fiber cut. No word on the exact model of co

Re: AS PATH limits

In my MUCH younger days, I may have helped abuse the global table via prepends, but never to that level :) On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > > Below is an example showing an excessive amount of prepending for prefix > > 185.135.134.0/23 at 2017-09-18 20:20:05 UTC. > > and the

Re: AS PATH limits

Maybe the next best path had, had 562 prepends? :) On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 12:09 PM, wrote: > > If you're on cogent, since 22:30 UTC yesterday or so this has been > happening > > (or happened). > > Still happening here. I count 562 prepends (563 * 262197) in the > advertisement we receive from

Re: 2010.10.06 NANOG50 day 3, Wednesday morning notes

+1 On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Guerra, Ruben wrote: > Thanks for the notes Matt! :) > > > > -Original Message- > From: Matthew Petach [mailto:mpet...@netflight.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 10:54 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: 2010.10.06 NANOG50 day 3, Wednesday mornin

Re: Internet in DPRK / North Korea

and his 3g's and his wifi's? :) On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 8:38 PM, John R. Levine wrote: > > 175.45.179.68/ > > > once senses that the potential successor wants his twitters and > facebooks... > >

Re: U.S. officials deny technical takedown of WikiLeaks

+1 On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Bret Clark wrote: > On 12/04/2010 06:03 PM, Ken Gilmour wrote: >> >> Now Sarah Palin is suggesting Wikileaks are terrorists and should be taken >> offline with technical capabilities >>  http://www.golem.de/1012/79848.html >> >> or for anyone who can't speak Ger

Re: Over a decade of DDOS--any progress yet?

+1 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Drew Weaver wrote: > Yes, but this obviously completes the 'DDoS attack' and sends the signal that > the bully will win. > > -Drew > > > -Original Message- > From: alvaro.sanc...@adinet.com.uy [mailto:alvaro.sanc...@adinet.com.uy] > Sent: Wednesday, De

Re: Routing Suggestions

What Joe Said. Static with 1918 space. If they NEED global space, explain 1918 space will work and tell them to use it. -jim On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote: >>> There are two companies, Company A and Company B, that are planning to >>> continuously exchange a large amount

Re: Securing Border Routers

Never put a firewall in front of a router, it will die first. The team CYMRU stuff is great make sure you have ACL's on your VTY and allow access only from trusted internal IPs. I also like using non world routable space on any interface I can. On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Brandon Kim wrote

Re: Connectivity status for Egypt

iMCI or WCOM? :) On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Alastair Johnson wrote: > > > For instance, our corporate WAN links into Cairo are still up (UUNET > PIP). > > that's the MCI PIP... > >

  1   2   3   >