Re: Contact data for outlook.com

You may also try the mailops list. On Tue, Mar 9, 2021, 12:55 PM Matthew V wrote: > If you haven't done this yet - start with the outlook postmaster > troubleshooting documentation and open a support ticket with them. > > https://sendersupport.olc.protection.outlook.com/pm/troubleshooting.aspx >

Buying IPs with poor reputation

I'm curious if anyone has experience deliberately buying blacklisted blocks, or blocks that otherwise have poor reputation. Is there a significant price difference? How do you seek them out? Most of the sellers I've found seem to focus on blocks with good reputation, or on improving the reputation

Re: PeerinDB refuses to register certain networks [was: Setting sensible max-prefix limits]

I, and many others that I know, have successfully listed our networks in PeeringDB while having no peering. You may just need to try again. On Wed, Aug 18, 2021, 5:53 PM Sabri Berisha wrote: > - On Aug 18, 2021, at 2:21 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net > wrote: > > Hi, > > > On Aug 1

Re: BGP - Traffic Management

Atlantic Metro (now 365 Datacenters) AS29838 allows more specifics on our backbone. We filter outbound to transit and peering obviously, but we allow e.g. granular steering if you have more than one port with us. On Thu, Aug 19, 2021, 1:23 PM Ryan Hamel wrote: > Hello, > > > > Does anyone know o

Re: De-bogonising 2a10::/12

Couldn't you just get a VPS with Vultr and set up BGP on it? On Fri, Jan 10, 2020, 11:44 AM Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote: > On 1/10/20 10:36 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: > > Much safer, but for me personally, still more downside than upside. > > Fair. > > I wish that I could get my hands on a DFZ BGP fe

More spam

FYI, this is a new one for me -- Forwarded message - From: Shopee SG Support Date: Fri, Jan 10, 2020, 12:10 PM Subject: [Request Received] Re: De-bogonising 2a10::/12 To: r...@tajvar.io Hi Ross Tajvar, Thank you for contacting Shopee! Your request has been received and is

Re: De-bogonising 2a10::/12

There are other options besides Vultr, that's just the one I've used the most. Check out http://bgp.services. On Fri, Jan 10, 2020, 12:34 PM Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote: > On 1/10/20 11:01 AM, Ross Tajvar wrote: > > Couldn't you just get a VPS with Vultr and set up BGP

Re: FYI - Suspension of Cogent access to ARIN Whois

Make sure they send evidence to complia...@arin.net so Cogent doesn't keep getting away with it. On Mon, Jan 27, 2020, 2:21 PM Darin Steffl wrote: > Cogent is still violating this whois suspension. > > A couple wisp's I know were contacted by cogent in the last week after > receiving their ASN.

Re: Comcast NOC - Bad IPv6 Routing

Interesting - does a v4 traceroute follow the same path? I.e. Richmond CRAN -> ibone Atlanta -> ibone Ashburn -> Pitt CRAN Not having detailed knowledge of Comcast's network, I'd expect the Richmond CRAN has a link to the ibone in Ashburn since it's fairly close (though there may be a closer ibone

Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential

Are you suggesting that ATT block all QUIC across their network? On Tue, Feb 18, 2020, 7:02 PM Ca By wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 5:44 PM Daniel Sterling > wrote: > >> I've AT&T fiber (in RTP, NC) (AS7018) and I notice UDP QUIC traffic >> from google (esp. youtube) becomes very slow aft

Re: Chairman Pai Proposes Mandating STIR/SHAKEN To Combat Robocalls

What is an "ebony phone"? (Google results for that phrase are mostly porn.) On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 12:55 PM Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 4:10 AM Bryan Holloway wrote: > > > > > > On 3/7/20 8:03 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 11:05 PM Brian J. Mu

Re: Constant Abuse Reports / Borderline Spamming from RiskIQ

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 8:52 AM Rich Kulawiec wrote: > there are > all kinds of things that can be done to detect problematic customers > before you sign them up and once they're in place. > Hey Rich, Can you give some examples of the things you mention above? I'm not doing much in terms of cu

Re: Issue with Noction IRP default setting (Was: BGP route hijack by AS10990)

Mark, I think trying to implement some kind of license requirement for DFZ participants is a step in the wrong direction and a waste of time and money. How would you even enforce it? If the goal is just to provide a bigger barrier to "kids born after 9/11", why not just increase RIR fees, or add a

Re: Issue with Noction IRP default setting (Was: BGP route hijack by AS10990)

out things "catching up with us" with no clear problem statement, we should be focusing our efforts on basic safeguards like filtering and RPKI OV. I don't consider that "burying my head in the sand". On Sun, Aug 2, 2020, 5:24 PM Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 2/Aug/20 21

Does anyone actually like CenturyLink?

I've never heard a single positive word about them, and I've had my fair share of issues myself (as an indirect customer). But it seems that lots of people put them in their transit blend. Other than lack of options, why would anyone use them? To me, it just seems like asking for trouble...but mayb

Re: Centurylink having a bad morning?

Not being intentional isn't really an excuseOutages are generally not intentional but we still like to use services that stay up most of the time. On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:11 AM Drew Weaver wrote: > I’m not defending them but I am sure it isn’t intentional. > > > > *From:* NANOG *On Behal

Re: Does anyone actually like CenturyLink?

nt about things when > they work well. > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:03 AM Ross Tajvar wrote: > >> I've never heard a single positive word about them, and I've had my fair >> share of issues myself (as an indirect customer). But it seems that lots of >> people

Telstra Hijack

I'm surprised no one else has mentioned this yet, but Telstra is hijacking a lot of prefixes: https://rpki.cloudflare.com/?view=bgp&prefix=&asn=1221&validState=Invalid Since we don't have RPKI filtering in our network (yet), we are currently filtering everything with the path ".* 4637 1221$". Th

Re: Telstra Hijack

I'm still seeing bad prefixes from Cogent, but our other upstreams (NTT, GTT, Telia) blocked them. On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 5:09 PM Sadiq Saif wrote: > On Tue, 29 Sep 2020, at 16:36, Ross Tajvar wrote: > > I'm surprised no one else has mentioned this yet, but Telstra is >

Re: Telstra Hijack

Bad prefixes are all gone. This looks resolved from my point of view. On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 5:18 PM Ross Tajvar wrote: > I'm still seeing bad prefixes from Cogent, but our other upstreams (NTT, > GTT, Telia) blocked them. > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 5:09 PM Sadiq Saif wrote

Charter/spectrum contact (AS20115)

Hi, can someone reach out off-list please? We are seeing very high latency to Spectrum residential users from LAX.

Re: BGP communities, was: Re: Facebook post-mortems... - Update!

There are also a bunch at http://bgp.community (linked to the source where possible instead of keeping a stale copy). On Tue, Oct 5, 2021, 1:17 PM Jay Hennigan wrote: > On 10/5/21 09:49, Warren Kumari wrote: > > > Can someone explain to me, preferably in baby words, why so many > > providers vie

Fiber contractor in Washington state

Hi all, I'm looking for a fiber contractor to trench some fiber on private property and then splice it inside. The work will be in Washington state, north of Spokane. Does anyone have recommendations? On- and off-list welcome. Thanks, Ross

Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging

Meraki finally allowed an operator to stop this a few years ago, but it's still the default. On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 6:34 PM Mike Lewinski via NANOG wrote: > Anyone swinging a clue-by-four it going to hit Meraki real hard. > > > https://community.meraki.com/t5/Switching/Switch-Constantly-Pings-8-

Fwd: Fw: HOST IRR Retirement

I tried sending the below message from my work account, but it's not a nanog subscriber, so the email was rejected. If anyone doubts the authenticity, feel free to reach out to me at rtaj...@365datacenters.com. -- *From:* Ross Tajvar *Sent:* Monday, April 11, 2

Re: Could people with experience with ARIN's IRR API contact me off-list?

I don't have anything for you, but I'm curious what IPAM you're using and what difficulties you're having. I'm looking to do something similar. On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 12:27 AM Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: > All, > > Dayjob uses RADB mainly but would like for authority purposes to put some > thing

Re: Verizon Wireless NRB group

Not sure if you have this already, but their phone number is +1 866-899-8998. On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 10:41 AM Mark Stevens wrote: > Verizon Wireless had a serious 4G/LTE issue affecting the Thingspace > product that cause a complete outage for many of our customers. > It would be greatly apprec

Re: Lima, OH Spectrum/Charter Severe Node/Hop Latency Issues

For those who haven't seen it (i.e. Austin), here is "the guide" on how to troubleshoot correctly with traceroute: https://archive.nanog.org/meetings/nanog47/presentations/Sunday/RAS_Traceroute_N47_Sun.pdf ICMP is deprioritized by any normal router. Non-cascading loss does not indicate a problem o

Re: 1299 capacity constraints

It extremely depends on who you're trying to reach and from what location. We've seen lots of T1s have congested peering lately. Unfortunately these days, having uncongested path requires paying a lot of attention and distributing your traffic yourself rather than simply handing it off to your tran

Re: 1299 capacity constraints

Someone else made this joke via direct email. Old minds think alike? On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 7:39 PM Matthew Petach wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023, 15:27 Ross Tajvar wrote: > >> It extremely depends on who you're trying to reach and from what >> location

Re: FB?

The cache invalidation thing is incorrect according to an Facebook SWE I talked to. He wouldn't tell me what it actually was though, basically saying "you have to know our infrastructure to understand and I can't tell you that." On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, 5:28 PM cosmo wrote: > Yes, evidently someone

Re: well-known Anycast prefixes

Not all any-casted prefixes are DNS resolvers and not all DNS resolvers are anycasted. It sounds like you would be better served by a list of well-known DNS resolvers. On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:35 PM Bryan Holloway wrote: > > On 3/21/19 10:59 AM, Frank Habicht wrote: > > Hi James, > > > > On 20

Re: residential/smb internet access in 2019 - help?

This is a common problem with no good solution. Fiber buildouts are almost always insanely expensive. If you can get one at a more reasonable cost, or more likely if you can sign a contract of a sufficient length to convince the carrier to subsidize it, you may be able to get good service that way.

Re: residential/smb internet access in 2019 - help?

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019, 11:34 PM david raistrick wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:29 PM Ross Tajvar wrote: > > >> But most likely you're just out of luck. >> > > it's really amazing that this is still the case, with our effectively > internet based

Re: residential/smb internet access in 2019 - help?

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019, 12:30 AM Mike Bolitho wrote: > Agreedthis is why monopolies are bad and municipal fiber is good. >> > > It's not like municipal fiber has some magic spell to make last mile > affordable though. On OP's instance he would run into the same issue and > would be paying that

Re: Amazon AS16509 peering... how long to wait?

>From what I've heard, their peering department is really behind on processing new peer turn-ups. On Sun, Apr 7, 2019, 6:16 PM Mehmet Akcin wrote: > I will connect you to right people offlist > > I am surprised its taking that long > > On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 16:41 John Von Essen wrote: > >> I a

Re: Gi Firewall for mobile subscribers

I agree with Owen that an always-on firewall which blocks all inbound traffic would be very frustrating to some users. I do understand your need as a provider to prevent expensive signaling operations. I think the suggestion of a toggle in a web portal to disable the firewall is a good compromise.

Re: Ownership of Routers on Both Ends of Transnational Links

"company-ic" and "company-gw" are commonly used names for /30s used for interconnection to a customer or another carrier. Those routers are likely owned/managed by Telia/Verizon. On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 8:54 AM Pengxiong Zhu wrote: > Howdy folks, > > We are a group of researchers at UC Riverside

Re: Ownership of Routers on Both Ends of Transnational Links

I think it's clear that the IPs belong to Telia, but I understood James's point to be that the router using the IP in question may belong to China Unicom. (I agree with that, I was not thinking clearly this morning.) As this is an interconnect link, one side must belong to Telia and the other to Ch

Re: My .sig (Was Re: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?)

I want to clarify that while I didn't say anything (since it wasn't on-topic in the other thread), I also found the long signature annoying. I did not read it beyond the first 1-2 lines. I expect many more than the few people who spoke up share this opinion. While I don't feel it's appropriate for

Re: Disney+ CDN

Looks like Disney has an ASN for their streaming service: https://www.peeringdb.com/net/15627 On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 5:26 PM Bryan Holloway wrote: > > On 4/12/19 2:31 PM, Chris Grundemann wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:03 PM Jared Geiger > > wrote:

Re: Disney+ CDN

one v6 /48, which *could* be enough IPs, but seems a little on the small side. On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 5:37 PM Bryan Holloway wrote: > > > On 4/26/19 4:33 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote: > > Looks like Disney has an ASN for their streaming service: > > https://www.peeringdb.com/

Re: Disney+ CDN

:US RegDate:2018-11-15 Updated:2018-11-15 Ref:https://rdap.arin.net/registry/entity/DSTL-2 On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 5:41 PM Ross Tajvar wrote: > Yeah, I'm going to send them an email and see if I can get ahold of their > peering policy. > > I'm h

Re: Disney+ CDN

Agreed, I noticed the single IX as well and asked them about it in my email. If they don't expand aggressively in the next ~6 months, they're going to have a very problematic launch. On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 5:59 PM Jon Lewis wrote: > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Ross Tajvar wrote: > >

Re: historical BGP announcements? (pre-1997)

Hey John, Just out of curiosity, what do you need this data for? On Mon, May 6, 2019, 3:53 PM Bill Woodcock wrote: > > > > On May 6, 2019, at 12:47 PM, John Osmon wrote: > > > > I've got a need to look for some announcements from the mid 1990s. > > The oldest I've found at at the University of

Re: BGP prefix filter list

If you're going whitebox, I would check out Netgate's new product called TNSR. It uses VPP for the data plane, which does all its processing in user space, thus avoiding the inefficiencies of the kernel network stack. That's particularly important at higher speeds like 40G or 100G. Disclaimer: I h

Re: DHCPv6-PD relay route injection - standard?

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 2:44 PM Tim Howe wrote: > Getting native dual-stack fully working > has been a long, strange road as a small ISP. I'm thinking about > writing something up about my experience so far. > I would definitely read that.

Re: BGP prefix filter list

In that case shouldn't each company advertise a /21? On Wed, May 22, 2019, 1:11 PM Sabri Berisha wrote: > Hi, > > One legitimate reason is the split of companies. In some cases, IP space > needs to be divided up. For example, company A splits up in AA and AB, and > has a /20. Company AA may adve

Re: Google weird routing?

Yeah, that's honestly a pretty crappy form. No room for an explanation, no individual contact, and an ETR of a month. I'm surprised there's not a better way to address issues like this On Thu, May 23, 2019, 5:13 PM Matt Harris wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 4:01 PM Patrick Schultz > wrote: >

Re: [nanog] Re: SSL VPN

I've used Pulse and AnyConnect (as a user) and Windows-based SSTP (as an admin). They all worked well. The nice part about the Windows option is that it's cheap (you only need to pay for a Windows license). On Sat, Jun 1, 2019, 12:53 PM Hansen, Christoffer wrote: > A solution based upon SSTP? >

Re: SSL VPN

I've used that too. I found the admin interface to be pretty unintuitive. And it kicks all active sessions without warning when you make a config change. On Sat, Jun 1, 2019, 2:32 PM Warren Kumari wrote: > OpenVPN AS? > > I’ve been running it for ~20 users for many years — it just works, has > c

Re: someone is using my AS number

Maybe try contacting the RIR? On Wed, Jun 12, 2019, 12:23 PM Philip Lavine via NANOG wrote: > yeah I did they are some MSP in India. No help. > > On Wednesday, June 12, 2019, 9:15:51 AM PDT, Filip Hruska > wrote: > > > Contact the offending upstreams. > > Filip > > On 12 June 2019 6:05:58 pm GM

Re: Issue with point to point VPNs behind NAT and asymmetric traffic

My guess is something is doing stateful filtering. If you send a SYN down one link and the SYN-ACK comes back a different link, the receiving firewall will discard it as bogus. You should be able to test this by doing pcaps to confirm the traffic is arriving (though I'm not familiar with WireGuard

Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP

I think that was a BitTorrent reference. On Thu, Jun 20, 2019, 8:17 PM Valdis Klētnieks wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 10:16:03 -0600, "Keith Medcalf" said: > > Having an inbound:outbound ration of 10:1 is known as a leech ... > > Just remember that without "leech" networks like Comcast, everybody

Re: CloudFlare issues?

Maybe I'm in the minority here, but I have higher standards for a T1 than any of the other players involved. Clearly several entities failed to do what they should have done, but Verizon is not a small or inexperienced operation. Taking 8+ hours to respond to a critical operational problem is what

Re: CloudFlare issues?

On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 9:01 PM Jared Mauch wrote: > > > On Jun 24, 2019, at 8:50 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote: > > > > Maybe I'm in the minority here, but I have higher standards for a T1 than any of the other players involved. Clearly several entities failed to do what

Re: Intermittent "bad gateway"

Gotta be more specific than that... What carrier(s) are you using? If you do a traceroute do your packets take a weird path? Etc. On Tue, Jul 2, 2019, 10:19 AM Stephen Satchell wrote: > Are we having another BGP problem this morning? >

Re: QoS for Office365

I think the difficulty lies in appropriately marking the traffic. Like Joe said, the IPs are always changing. On Tue, Jul 9, 2019, 9:15 AM Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 9/Jul/19 16:08, Joe Yabuki wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Thanks for your replies, > > > > I'll rephrase just to clarify, our aim is t

Re: SHAKEN/STIR Robocall Summit - July 11 2019 at FCC

What if you use different carriers for termination and origination? How does your termination carrier validate that your origination carrier has allocated certain numbers to you and that you're therefore allowed to make outbound calls with a caller ID set to those numbers? That doesn't sound to me

Re: SHAKEN/STIR Robocall Summit - July 11 2019 at FCC

mework in mind which carriers can implement that prevents fraudulent caller ID information from being sent without preventing legitimate use cases? On Thu, Jul 11, 2019, 2:46 PM Keith Medcalf wrote: > > On Thursday, 11 July, 2019 12:38, Ross Tajvar wrote: > > >What if you use dif

Re: Twitter security team?

Why is Hacker one wrong? Seems like this would be exactly what it's for. On Thu, Jul 18, 2019, 3:04 PM J. Hellenthal via NANOG wrote: > Or maybe a tweet to @twittersecurity > > > On Jul 18, 2019, at 13:59, J. Hellenthal wrote: > > > > > > Yes/No ? > > > > > https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and

Re: netstat -s

Why do you want to know? On Thu, Jul 18, 2019, 5:55 PM Randy Bush wrote: > > Ideally folks should be subshells (unless you're on a strange system or > > legacy system). > > > > netstat is now mostly obsolete. > > Replacement for netstat is ss. > > Replacement for netstat -r is ip route. > > Rep

Re: netstat -s

> but could you answer my question? Just seemed like there was some urgency so I was curious. On Thu, Jul 18, 2019, 5:57 PM Randy Bush wrote: > > Why do you want to know? > > why do you want to know why i want to know? :) > >

Re: Microsoft Outlook Issue

What's the issue? On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:35 PM Nathanael Catangay Cariaga < ncari...@gmail.com> wrote: > This might be an off topic since this is a confirmed issue with Microsoft > but I'm just wondering how vast are the affected users on this issue. > > west coast user here. > > > -natha

Re: Microsoft Outlook Issue

ge Online. Next update by: Friday, July 19, 2019, at 5:30 > PM UTC* > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 12:38 AM Ross Tajvar wrote: > >> What's the issue? >> >> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:35 PM Nathanael Catangay Cariaga < >> ncari...@gmail.com> wrote: >>

Re: 240/4 (Re: 44/8)

> Editor's note: This draft has not been submitted to any formal > process. It may change significantly if it is ever submitted. > You are reading it because we trust you and we value your > opinions. *Please do not recirculate it.* Please join us in > testing patches an

Re: Help needed configure a server

Peter, You might want to check out reddit, specifically r/homelab. That subreddit has a lot of good resources for the type of stuff you've described (check the wiki). This mailing list is more aimed at enterprise-level networking, so probably not the best place to ask these kind of questions. Be

Best ways to ensure redundancy with no terrestrial ISPs

Hi all, A friend of mine is trying to set up a network in a location where there is no fiber (or copper) for many miles. As bandwidth requirements are low (<1M for the foreseeable future) but uptime is important, he was looking at using multiple cell modems from separate carriers as redundant upli

Re: Best ways to ensure redundancy with no terrestrial ISPs

acebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXS

Re: Best ways to ensure redundancy with no terrestrial ISPs

On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 4:30 PM Brian Henson wrote: > If we had a location (or at least a part of the world) we might be able to > recommend a little better. > This is in northern Africa.

Re: Xfinity with IPv6 clue?

Did you get in touch with someone? What was the problem? On Sun, Aug 4, 2019, 9:50 PM Janet Sullivan wrote: > Nanog is magical. I have working IPv6 now. > > > > *From:* Janet Sullivan > *Sent:* Sunday, August 4, 2019 6:29 PM > *To:* 'nanog@nanog.org' > *Subject:* Xfinity with IPv6 clue? > > >

Re: Best ways to ensure redundancy with no terrestrial ISPs

gt; different teleports on the other end. > > But that's not going to be cheap, either in a one time equipment cost or > in monthly recurring cost, for o3b services and transponder kHz lease + > teleport services on the other end somewhere in continental Europe. > > On Sat,

Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17

First he thought that a /17 got stolen (by creating a company with the same name as the original, now-defunct owner), but he then said he was wrong and actually it either 1) got transferred against ARIN policy or 2) was made to look like it was transferred by altering the whois data. On Fri, Aug 9

Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17

Seems like submitting a fraud request to ARIN is more effective than writing a novel and sending it to NANOG, and doesn't require the latter... On Mon, Aug 12, 2019, 3:16 PM John Curran wrote: > On 9 Aug 2019, at 4:09 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette > wrote: > > ... > > Unfortunately, we cannot read to

Re: Looking for a Google contact (peering frustrations)

What was the outcome? On Tue, Aug 27, 2019, 8:35 PM Jon Sands wrote: > Fixed off list by (several) google employees. Thanks! > > On 8/26/2019 10:52 PM, Jon Sands wrote: > > AS397031 here, located in Telehouse (7 Teleport). We picked up a port > > on NYIIX specifically to peer with google and clo

Re: Weekly Routing Table Report

> I don't think I need such chance as my argument is already good enough. I'm curious if you're able to convince anyone that your thoughts are valid and correct with such an attitude.

Re: Weekly Routing Table Report

> There are other articles, some of which are peer reviewed papers, > describing details. Can you link those?

Re: Weekly Routing Table Report

Is anyone else getting flashbacks to the guy who said he solved the spam problem? I don't think this conversation is going anywhere productive. On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:05 AM Masataka Ohta < mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote: > Owen DeLong wrote: > > > My knowledge in this case is having b

Re: Mx204 alternative

I'd like to register my interest as well. I think an open hardware platform will do a lot to move the industry forward. On Mon, Sep 2, 2019, 10:09 PM Brandon Martin wrote: > On 9/2/19 6:04 PM, Mark Tinka wrote: > >> Like how about 8-16*100GE single Trio PCI card with no-questions > >> asked, spe

Re: BGP Enabled transit in Chicago (River North) and equipment recommendation

I will note that Comcast will do BGP on their enterprise fiber circuits. Comcast DIA (which they call EDI) comes in increments of 1M up to 10M, then 10M up to 100M, etc. So you could get 10M or 80M (not sure if "10MB/Sec" means 10Mbps or 80MBps) and do BGP over that, if it's available. RCN is likel

Re: Comcast route server not reflecting their reality

> > Unlike AS2914 which purely interconnects with AS7922, it seems that AS3356 > also has direct interconnections to the various Comcast subsidiary > networks which are hidden from the DFZ through no-export communities. I'm curious how this works and why it's done this way. I have a friend who ha

Re: Comcast route server not reflecting their reality

> > IIRC, Comcast uses "local-as 7922" path rewriting for all enterprise EDI > customers > running BGP off of regional CRANs, unless I'm mistaken. So if your > regional CRAN > is as7015 (for New England), even if your physical circuit and BGP session > land > on a local SUR in your area, you have

Re: Consistent routing policy?

> > https://archive.nanog.org/meetings/nanog40/presentations/BGPcommunities.pdf > Don’t let anyone send you Informational tags, these should only be set by > you, and you should strip them from all BGP neighbors (customers, transits, > peers, etc). Otherwise you have a massive security problem.

Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond

> > > 1. Sprint peering battle. Google it > > 2. He.net peering battle. Google it. > > 3. Google IPv6 peering battle. Google it. > > > > All of which point to them being pompous assholes. > > or point to them treating ipv6 the same as ipv4 when it comes to > peering, tech, ... we are supposed to t

Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond

Ah, sorry, I didn't understand your message. Nevermind. On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 8:53 PM Ross Tajvar wrote: > > 1. Sprint peering battle. Google it >> > 2. He.net peering battle. Google it. >> > 3. Google IPv6 peering battle. Google it. >> > >> > Al

Re: ISP Job

You haven't answered the question about your credentials, though. On Mon, Sep 23, 2019, 8:48 PM David Ratkay wrote: > To give some more info I live in South Bend, Indiana. So Michigan actually > could be an option. > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019, 4:01 AM David Ratkay wrote: > >> I have been looking t

Re: Twilio

They do a lot of things. It might help to specify what you're having issues with. On Wed, Oct 2, 2019, 7:51 PM Ben Cannon wrote: > Can an engineer for Twilio please reach out to me off-list if possible? > Thanks. > -Ben. > > -Ben Cannon > CEO 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC > b...@6by7.net > > >

Re: BGP Enabled transit in Chicago (River North) and equipment

If you're okay with a tunnel, you may want to check out http://bgp.services. On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 8:36 AM John Palmer wrote: > I've got a Cisco 881 with the "Advanced IP features" This will do for what > I'm > trying to accomplish. > > I think I'm going to go with a BGP tunnel. > > No one at

Re: Anyone from NTT America here?

What was the source/destination? On Wed, Oct 23, 2019, 2:10 PM Stephen Satchell wrote: > Routing loop > > > 11.|-- 129.250.24.196 0.0% 1 28.9 28.9 28.9 28.9 > 0.0 > > 12.|-- 129.250.130.2540.0% 1 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 > 0.0 > > 13.|-- 129.250.130.253

Re: T-Mobile help!!

You may want to try VoiceOps: https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops. On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 9:05 AM David Funderburk wrote: > One of our customers office number is coming across as 'Survey Call' on > T-Mobile cell phones. I know with certainty it's with 'T-Mobile' phones. > I don't

Re: Disney+ Streaming

I think it would be more on topic if everyone weren't just guessing what users will do based on hypothetical behavior patterns and hypothetical content shifts. I WOULD be interested to see some data showing e.g. a drop in traffic to one service and a boost in traffic to another service when a part

Re: Iran cuts 95% of Internet traffic

Do we have any ideas which prefixes are still accessible? On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 3:01 PM Scott Fisher wrote: > One would hope so, but I am I sure they will just threaten their > population on using it. Tyrannical regimes know no bounds. > > Thanks, > Scott Fisher > Team Cymru > > On 11/18/19 2:

Re: AT&T released DANOS code to Linux Foundation

For an additional point of reference - I run two Edgerouter Pros with multiple full tables (v4 and v6). One of them is fine, but one of them crashes and reboots about once a week. I'm currently trying to replace them, possibly with DANOS now that it's out. On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 4:23 PM Brielle

Re: Disney+ Streaming

Well, not exactly. Each service is still a bunch of shows and movies bundled together. If you only want to watch one show, you can't just buy that, you have to buy the whole service. Of course, there are services where you can buy individual movies and episodes (Google Play comes to mind). But Net

Re: Gmail email blocking is off the rails (again)

You might have better luck emailing the mailops list. On Tue, Dec 3, 2019, 10:06 PM Matthew Pounsett wrote: > > For some reason Gmail has started blocking mailman administrative emails > to someone who's an admin on a list I host. Their SMTP 552 error message > points to

Visible Wireless security contact

I'm looking to get in touch with someone on the Visible Wireless security team. If you have a contact please shoot me their info. Thanks, Ross

Re: Thursday: Internet outage eastern Europe Iran and Turkey

I'm interested in these events. It might be worth making a separate list for them? On Sat, Dec 21, 2019, 6:24 PM Scott Weeks wrote: > > > --- s...@donelan.com wrote: > From: Sean Donelan > > I hadn't seen messages about this Internet outage affecting multiple > countries (Eastern Europe, Turkey

Re: ServiceFinder: Ärendenummer 185392

I've been getting these too. It'd be nice if the admins could unsubscribe these people. On Sun, Dec 29, 2019, 5:26 PM J. Hellenthal via NANOG wrote: > Well if that ain’t just plain spam I don’t know what is! > > -- > J. Hellenthal > > The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway

Re: FYI - Suspension of Cogent access to ARIN Whois

Yeah this raises a great point - I'm curious how ARIN is differentiating between cogent and cogens customers when monitoring for prohibited access. Particularly those customers whose IPs belong to and are announced by Cogent. On Mon, Jan 6, 2020, 10:38 PM Martin Hannigan wrote: > > — shifting a

VPP-based router

Hi all, Has anyone had any luck building their own routers on common compute (x86) with VPP? I'm considering it as I'm looking for a cheap, fast peering router. I haven't seen much written about that type of solution so I was wondering if anyone here has experience to share. Thanks, Ross

  1   2   >