Not that I know of, especially given the location. I'll look into it though.
On Sat, Aug 3, 2019, 3:42 PM Mike Hammett <na...@ics-il.net> wrote: > Any existing WISPs? > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Ross Tajvar" <r...@tajvar.io> > *To: *"North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog@nanog.org> > *Sent: *Saturday, August 3, 2019 2:30:43 PM > *Subject: *Best ways to ensure redundancy with no terrestrial ISPs > > Hi all, > > A friend of mine is trying to set up a network in a location where there > is no fiber (or copper) for many miles. As bandwidth requirements are low > (<1M for the foreseeable future) but uptime is important, he was looking at > using multiple cell modems from separate carriers as redundant uplinks. I > am concerned that different cell carriers might be using the same transport > providers to a given tower, so that wouldn't be truly redundant. Another > option would be using a satellite provider as a backup for cellular. (The > high latency that comes with satellite is not an issue.) > > A fixed-radio solution would likely be too expensive upfront as it would > require building towers. > > Am I missing any other options or considerations? > > Thanks, > Ross > >
