On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 12:01 AM Mark Foster wrote:
> And I don't see that opening up a UDP port on every end-user device to
> receive some sort of broadcast (unicast?) is going to be great security. ...
Yeah: This is probably best done by either requiring the streaming services to
know where
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 12:02 PM Rich Kulawiec wrote:
[snip]
> streaming company need to be able to authenticate the alerts from
> all those different agencies. Those agencies also need to secure [...]
The agencies would already submit their alerts through IPAWS gateways
managed by FEMA;
otherwi
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 2:50 PM wrote:
> Could we make the battery just a little more powerful? How much power
> would a bit of circuitry waiting for a "turn on! there's a new message
> coming in!" need? []
If your network connectivity, or web browser, or cellular reception
stops working;
used to decrypt it both pieces of
info pass through systems completely administered by the same provider
at some point.
The end user has no visibility and lacks so much as a contract they
would breach by deploying the update.
> NOTE: I have no idea how chrome does it's thing here... but I expect the code
> is
> visible on chromium.org ? Perhaps even here:
--
-Jim
apply to very small businesses though where they could afford
> to try to ignore the ransom request and rebuild more securely hoping the
> criminals will move on and not come back for revenge.
>
--
-Jim
scribe, have something in place that
> drops anything from them, and move on with your day.
--
-Jim
ts on certain issues specifically
against botnets, malware, DDoS risks; they distribute to the IP block
owners on need-to-know.
> Jean
--
-Jim
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 1:29 PM Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 09:44:04PM +, [..]
> It depends on where you are (from my resolver, I get
> 64.130.197.11). This is because the name voyager.viser.net is not
> stable yet. Depending on your resolver, it points to 64.130.2
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:38 PM Robert L Mathews wrote:
> I didn't see the page, but for what it's worth, this is governed by this
> ICANN policy:> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/errp-2013-02-28-en
It is common that registrars repoint nameservers and redirect web traffic when a
domain's r
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 11:05 AM John R. Levine wrote:
..> The IETF is not the Network Police, and all IETF standards are entirely
> voluntary.
Yes, however the IETF standards can be an obstacle -- if they are, then
it is reasonable to adjust that which might impede a future useful development:
r
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 8:24 PM David Conrad wrote:
>
...
> Some (not me) might argue it could (further) hamper IPv6 deployment by
> diverting limited resources.
It may help IPv6 deployment if more V4 addresses are eventually
released and allocated
Assuming the RIRs would ultimately like to prov
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 1:02 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
> On 11/20/21 10:44 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> that it needs 400M addresses. If you wanted to reclaim ipv4 addresses it
> seems that class D and class E would be a much better target than loopback.
> Mike, not that I have any stake in this
400M
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 12:09 PM Blake Hudson wrote:
>
> On 5/4/2023 9:09 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
>
> I can't speak for aptum, but I'm curious as to why this is important to
> you?
>
> > SWIP'ing or delegating address space is a requirement of the contract
> signed with ARIN wh
On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 5:59 PM William Herrin wrote:
A server generation is about 3 years before it's obsolete and is
> generally replaced. I suggest making the old address operable for two .
> generations (6 years) and black-holed for another generation (3 more
>
As you mention.. there is
ts to distribute users and
Authorizing configurations to
devices as local authorization through secure protocols as favorable to
those network authentication systems
that transmit sensitive decisions and user data across the network using
Insecure protocols.
--
-Jim
n't arise so much for using the TACACS+ / Tac_plus service Solely for
Accounting
(in addition to basic remote syslog).
client implementation we use), which only supports *OpenSSH*
> certificates.
>
--
-Jim
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 11:44 AM Kevin McCormick wrote:
>
> If the DNS request comes from an IP in matching a CIDR network address in the
> ULS record, then the server would respond with an error message telling the
> application to use the configured local DNS server.
All if this is ultimately
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 1:08 PM Jeff Shultz wrote:
>[snip]
> What has most people (from anecdotal observation) concerned is that we
> are usually more than one or two carriers out from an IXP where the
> speed test server will be, and don't have a lot of influence on paths
> and carriers that we a
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 09:08:12AM -0500, sro...@ronan-online.com wrote:
> less the Internet content become moderated by a small group of private
> platform owners.
it already is.
it is just that it is moderated in their favour, to create more ad impressions
and re-sellable data points.
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 06:15:21PM -0500, Izaac wrote:
> Got links?
bot.
--
Jim Mercer Reptilian Research j...@reptiles.org+1 416 410-5633
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of
arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather
to skid
unsure if this is allowed or not, but, here goes.
https://www.gofundme.com/f/ed-hew-medical-expenses
some of you may remember ed.
some, maybe not.
but, as the uucp maps maintainer for canada, he was quite influential in
the rise of email, and to some degree, the internet, in canada.
--jim
unrelated, but, David Tilbrook, an early Unix pioneer, passed away a week or
so ago. due to COVID.
https://leahneukirchen.org/blog/archive/2021/01/remembering-the-work-of-david-m-tilbrook-and-the-qed-editor.html
--jim
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:59:27PM +, Mel Beckman wrote:
> So of
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 09:23:11AM -0800, William Herrin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:40 AM Jim Mercer wrote:
> > unsure if this is allowed or not, but, here goes.
>
> This is a lie.
there are a myriad of lists focused on free speech issues, and domestic and
international
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:04:02AM -0800, Sabri Berisha wrote:
> - On Jan 25, 2021, at 8:37 AM, Jim Mercer j...@reptiles.org wrote:
> > https://www.gofundme.com/f/ed-hew-medical-expenses
>
> Just a headsup for those outside of Canada. My transaction was processed
> in CAD i
ve a lot of rules.
:-)
that being said, it was not my intent to start a deluge of requests for money,
or in memorial posts.
and, even if it did, those threads would soon die off, as with all the other
threads.
--jim
--
Jim Mercer Reptilian Research j...@reptiles.org+1 416 410-5633
obsolete protocol" is using a
normative, rather than empirical, definition of "obsolete". In the
empirical sense, things are obsolete when people stop using them. Tine
will tell when that happens.
Jim Shankland
Your asking if anyone does it or your offering your services?
-jim
On Tue., Mar. 9, 2021, 3:56 p.m. Nathanael Cariaga,
wrote:
> Apologies for this shameless plug, but wanted to ask if any folks on this
> list who does network/infrastructure security testing? Please to reach back
>
ailing-lists, with the ability for
anyone to create their own sub-forums.
it was quite popular for a while.
--jim
--
Jim Mercer Reptilian Research j...@reptiles.org+1 416 410-5633
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of
arriving safely in a pretty and well pre
gs, because Wish injected an ad for some plausibly NSFW item.
no thanks.
--
Jim Mercer Reptilian Research j...@reptiles.org+1 416 410-5633
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of
arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather
to skid in broadsi
While I have no design to engage in over email argument over how much
latency people can actually tolerate, I will simply state that most people
have a very poor understanding of it and how much additional latency is
really introduced by DDoS mitigation.
As for implying that DDoS mitigation compan
up (wired)
>> 5 Mbps down / 1 Mbps up (wireless)
>>
>> 2021 ??? / ??? (some Senators propose 100/100 mbps)
>>
>> Not only in major cities, but also rural areas
>>
>> Note, the official broadband definition only means service providers
>> can't
>> advertise it as "broadband" or qualify for subsidies; not that they must
>> deliver better service.
>>
>>
--
Jim Troutman,
jamesltrout...@gmail.com
Pronouns: he/him/his
207-514-5676 (cell)
really
> ever been accurate.
>
> There are a bunch of examples in this thread of reasons why 'more than X'
> is a good thing for the end-user, and that average usage over time is a bad
> metric to use in the discussion. At the very least the ability to get
> around/out-of serialization delays and microburst behavior is beneficial to
> the end-user.
>
> Maybe the question that's not asked (but should be) is:
> "Why is 100/100 seen as problematic to the industry players?"
>
>
>
> --
Jim Troutman,
jamesltrout...@gmail.com
Pronouns: he/him/his
207-514-5676 (cell)
ir residents for the
bandwidth provided. I know of muni owned networks where the residents are
paying $30/month for full 1GigE ISP service, and all the other costs are
paid by their property taxes servicing a long term bond for the
construction costs.
--
Jim Troutman,
jamesltrout...@gmail.com
Pronouns: he/him/his
207-514-5676 (cell)
Also saw a major traffic drop. There is a Root Cause to be issued early in
the week I'm told.
-jim
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 2:42 PM Siyuan Miao wrote:
> Yea, it was down but both RS are online and feeding us unreachable
> nexthops during the outage .
>
> On Sat, Jun 12, 202
It won't get them depeered, nor should it. I don't currently based much
value in RPKI for BGP.
On Mon., Aug. 9, 2021, 8:43 a.m. Rubens Kuhl, wrote:
> From a Cogent support ticket:
> "Hello,
>
> Please see the attached LOA.
>
> Regarding the RPKI ROA, for now, we don't create ROA for our prefixe
tions,
bad guys/good/in the middle nation to find out about dissidents, activists,
and journos than flow data. I think letting any of those people think ToR
is safe as being a much bigger risk.
-jim
Disclosures for those that don't know. I've never worked with Team Cymru,
I do know them
I remember having this discussion more than 20yrs ago, minus the ARIN bit,
couldn't get every to agree to it it then either :(. We don't need more
rules, we just need to start with basic hygiene. Was a novel idea :)
On Mon., Apr. 20, 2020, 2:41 p.m. Christopher Morrow, <
morrowc.li...@gmail.com> w
>
> >
> > Geolocate and VPN or Not are often kind of tied to the same kinds of
> reporting services and it may well be that whatever provider HBO is using
> for one is also being used for the other.
> >
> > Owen
> >
> >
>
--
Jim Troutman,
jamesltrout...@gmail.com
Pronouns: he/him/his
207-514-5676 (cell)
Suspect for most th answer is poorly. This is a conversation I've had with
a few people about how they could be well made
-jim
On Thu., Sep. 9, 2021, 12:45 p.m. Randy Bush, wrote:
> to control inbound traffic, how do bgp optimizers decide how to tune
> what they announce? slfow?
Having done peering for many $big_boys_club and $small_isps, it always
comes down to politics, $$ and time. The balance may change but end of day
its those variables and its a painful game some days. From all sides :(
-jim
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 1:07 PM Laura Smith via NANOG
wrote
World broke. Crazy $$ per hour down time. Doors open with a fire axe.
Glass breaks super easy too and much less expensive then adding 15 min to
failure.
-jim
On Tue., Oct. 5, 2021, 7:05 p.m. Jeff Shultz,
wrote:
> 7. Make sure any access controlled rooms have physical keys that
I don't see posting in a DR process thead about thinking to use alternative
entry methods to locked doors and spreading false information. If do
well. Mail filters are simple.
-jim
On Tue., Oct. 5, 2021, 7:35 p.m. Niels Bakker,
wrote:
> * deles...@gmail.com (jim deleskie) [Tue 05
rts of things arise?
>>
>>
>>
>> I checked google, maxmind and a handful of others and those all know that
>> we are in the US.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Drew
>>
> --
Jim Troutman,
jamesltrout...@gmail.com
Pronouns: he/him/his
207-514-5676 (cell)
This is actually worse than our collective progress on replacing v4 to
date.
-jim
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 7:31 PM Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> This seems like a really bad idea to me; am I really the only one who
> noticed?
>
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast
Have you found anyone. Not there any more but can probably still find
someone for you.
-jim
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022, 10:11 AM Drew Weaver wrote:
> Does anyone have a contact for AS 6453 or are there any AS 6453 folks on
> list?
>
>
>
> Seeing some routing trouble from their c
I respect the people and goals here, but strongly echo Mel's statement.
This is a much larger hammer then mail filtering lists.
-jim
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022, 11:26 AM Mel Beckman wrote:
> In my view, there is a core problematic statement in this document:
>
> “Military and propa
Terrible idea on so many levels.
-jim
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022, 12:30 PM Patrick Bryant wrote:
> I don't like the idea of disrupting any Internet service. But the current
> situation is unprecedented.
>
> The Achilles Heel of general public use of Internet services has
If then industry still hasn't adopted v6 full in 25 years maybe it's v6
that should be given up it, that it clearly wasn't what customers wanted.
Perhaps we should should have a small group working on the next iteration.
-jim
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022, 5:54 PM Jacques Latour wrote:
their published limits. Arista was the only one in 2 days I didn't break.
Use case big fast simple L3 BGP router.
-jim
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:11 AM David Hubbard <
dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com> wrote:
> Hi all, would love to get any current opinions (on or off list) on the
> sta
:
> Anyone from Disney+ here? If you can reply off-list I'd appreciate it. I
> have emailed every place I can think of to solve a geoip problem affecting
> hundreds of customers, no reply in weeks.
> Would appreciate some help thanks in advance.
> --
> Norman
> JellyD
Having lived in and continue to spend as much time in Montreal as I can.
This list made be laugh, especially for a group where most of us do a lot
of travel.
Other then no right on red. Montreal like any other city. Don't be an ass
and enjoy yourself.
On Thu, May 5, 2022, 9:56 AM Nanog News
; an ISP we barely noticed anything. Before this the two most popular speeds
> were the 100/20 and 1000/500 plans, 50% of users would order the 1000/500
> plan, most without really knowing why but it was only about $20 different
> so why not. As an ISP the 1G users only used about 10%-20% mor
i cant see BGP taking out SS7.
-jim
On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 2:45 PM Snowmobile2004
wrote:
> According to Cloudflare Radar
> <https://radar.cloudflare.com/asn/812?date_filter=last_24_hours>, Rogers
> BGP announcements spiked massively to levels 536,777% higher than normal
&
Seriously search the list people. Even a little effort on your own. Same
question a few days ago.
-jim
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022, 3:45 PM Joshua Pool via NANOG wrote:
> Anyone have a contact for AKAMAI?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Josh
>
d /24 will not be covered by any smaller prefix.
>
> What do you think about this approach ?
>
> Also maybe you know - some advices for edge routers that have at least
> 8x100G interfaces and "good" memory for prefix count ? Thanks
>
>
> --
Jim Troutman,
jamesltrout...@gmail.com
Pronouns: he/him/his
207-514-5676 (cell)
I dont think ive every agreed with Owen this much, maybe this is the first
sign the wording is ending further proving his statement :)
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 10:30 PM Owen DeLong via NANOG
wrote:
> Oh, I’m not ignoring it, I’m just rather underwhelmed by it and given how
> long it took SIDRWG to
Have you tried NOC not sure who from their actively monitors the list
anymore? Forwarding to a former colleague.
-jim
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 2:49 PM Norman Jester wrote:
> Contact me off list... seeing major loss at 64.86.252.65 in your path.
>
> Norman Jester
> 619-319-7055
>
year break. They’ve fed it up
> to their tech people towards the ISD. Details available off-list.
>
> Any insights are welcome, and as I said, I’d like to understand where the
> source list is as it starts out working then gradually breaks, so someone
> is publishing things and they are going out further.
>
> - Jared
--
Jim Troutman,
jamesltrout...@gmail.com
Pronouns: he/him/his
207-514-5676 (cell)
For me, that's easiest to do with Linux or MacOS (terminal). But sure,
if "open on a Linux machine" still means "point and click", then you're
absolutely correct.
Jim Shankland
her up the incline, the
question is will it continue another 10+ years, where the growth rate is
nearing straight up :)
-jim
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:26 PM Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2019, Tom Ammon wrote:
>
> > Netflow for historical data is great, but I guess what I
Louie,
Its almost like us old guys knew something, and did know everything back
then, the more things have changed the more that they have stayed the same
:)
-jim
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:52 PM Louie Lee wrote:
> +1 Also on this.
>
> From my viewpoint, the game is roughly the sam
triggered :)
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 11:31 AM Bryan Holloway wrote:
>
> On 6/4/19 9:20 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 3/Jun/19 15:41, Fletcher Kittredge wrote:
> >>
> >> Here is your checklist in descending order of importance:
> >>
> >> 1. market opportunity
> >> 2. finding the right pa
eeing the same thing? Any thoughts on what's going on?
Or should I just be ignoring this and getting on with the weekend?
Jim
argeting a broad set of
destinations in parallel; if source addresses are forged, they are from
a fairly narrow set of source IPs.
The atypical pattern seems noteworthy in itself. Not a crisis, but not
quite routine, either.
Jim
On 8/17/19 3:16 PM, Damian Menscher wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 3:05 PM Jim Shankland <mailto:na...@shankland.org>> wrote:
I'm seeing slow-motion (a few per second, per IP/port pair) syn flood
attacks ostensibly originating from 3 NL-based IP blocks:
88.20
aches you.
(Sorry, it's Friday afternoon. I'll show myself out.)
Jim
**
It doesn't seem to be simply a matter of backlogged messages finally going
out. My friend replied to the mystery messages received from me and I
thought she was accidentally responding on the wrong thread. Her texts
seemed spontaneous and disjointed which is why I assumed she was on the
wrong threa
Using a TPIA provider here at home in Nova Scotia same issue.
-jim
On Tue., Nov. 12, 2019, 6:29 p.m. Michael Crapse,
wrote:
> Myself and a few other ISPs are having our eyeballs complain about
> disney+ saying that they're on a VPN. Does anyone have any idea, or who to
> contact
fyi,
some discussion and below link from the bind mailing list on this
https://atlas.ripe.net/dnsmon/group/g-root
On 4/14/2016 7:36 AM, Nicholas Suan wrote:
I'm see the same thing from multiple networks.
$ dig NS . @g.root-servers.net
; <<>> DiG 9.9.5 <<>> NS . @g.root-servers.net
;; glob
quot;normally" flows
across it.
On top of that any given DDoS attack seldom last long enough to materially
impact 95%ile billing, so carriers don't make anything from it, but have to
do all the work of moving it around.
-jim
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Roland Dobbins wrote:
> O
ator with sfp+ ports.
> I am interested in any input as to brands to look at, build one myself etc.
> Thanks,Mitchell
--
Jim Greene
Lockheed Martin
AFRL/RCM
2435 Fifth St
WPAFB, OH. 45433
937-656-5692
greenejk@afrl.hpc.mil
I don't suspect many folks that are outside of this list would likely have
any idea how to set up a v6 tunnel. Those of us on the list, likely have a
much greater ability to influence v6 adoption or not via day job
deployments then Netflix supporting v6 tunnels or not.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:49
Damian, I HIGHLY doubt regular folks are running into issues with this, I
suspect its not even geeks in general having issues, I suspect 80% plus of
those having issues spend most of their time complaining about something
related to v6 and the rest of the geeks not loving them/it enough.
-jim
On
mail, they were very quick to respond. And within 24 hors they were
able to write a fix for my specific issue and build a new release for me to
download and test.
I think that says something for their support team.
Even if my office doesn't adopt RainLoop, I will continue using it on my
pe
I don't buy this. They sold you one cable before, they sell you cable now.
Little difference then we moved customers from a T1 to T3 back in the
90's. If Colo's can't understand more then 20+ yrs of evolution its hardly
right to blame it on the market.
I don't read this list continually, but do archive it; your note was
flagged for me to comment on.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Eric Tykwinski
wrote:
> This is probably for Jim Gettys directly, but I’m sure most others have
> input. I could of sworn that that there was some t
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Baldur Norddahl
wrote:
> Den 22. jul. 2016 21.34 skrev "Jim Gettys" :
> >
> >
> > So it is entirely appropriate in my view to give even "high speed"
> > connections low grades; it's telling you that they suck u
x27;s going to take years for the WiFi fixes to percolate through the
ecosystem, which is very dysfunctional (it's taken about 4 years to see
Docsis 3.1 modems, which are only now appearing).
- Jim
If you would like to see a plot of all th
sigh...
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore
wrote:
> CloudFlare will claim they are not hosting the problem. They are just
> hosting the web page that lets you pay for or points at or otherwise
> directs you to the problem.
>
> The actual source of packets is some other IP addre
Back in the day didn't we refer to such hosting as bulletproof hosting?
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Phil Rosenthal wrote:
> Plus, it’s good for business!
>
> -Phil
>
> > On Jul 26, 2016, at 10:14 PM, jim deleskie wrote:
> >
> > sigh...
> >
> &
ill see some
vendors evolve, new vendors of their brand of foo appear and some vendors
die, but end of day, its no different then most of were doing back in the
"good ol days"
-jim
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Ca By
Redirecting someone's traffic, with out there permission or a court order,
by a court in your jurisdiction, not a lot different then the "bad guys"
themselves.
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
> Hopefully this is operational enough, though obviously leaning more
> towards
cheap, secure, reliable
pick two.
--jim
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Jeff Jones wrote:
> Sorry if this is low level. But are people sick of registrars jacking up
> prices? Who is the cheapest and most reliable? I have been using whois.com,
> networksolutions.com and am looking
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:43:50AM -0700, james machado wrote:
> so who would you quantify as secure and reliable? who does not require
> additional "services" besides registration or spend all their time trying
> to upsell you?
i'm good with easydns.com
--jim
>
They were hosting him for free, and like insurance, I can assure you if you
are consistently using a service, and not covering the costs of that
service you won't be a client for long. This is the basis for AUP/client
contracts and have been going back to the days when we all offered only
dialup i
Not at all. I refered to AUP's as a way people remove you from a service
when you use more of it then you are paying for.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, jim deleskie wrote:
>
> > They were hosting him for free, and like insurance,
Sorry but you are mistaken. I've worked at Sr. levels for several LARGE and
medium sized networks. What does it cost and what do we make doing it,
over rules what is "good for the internet" every time it came up.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Ca By wrote:
> On Sunday, September 25, 2016, Joh
were made with out all aspects being
taken into play
-jim
Original Message
From:bran...@rd.bbc.co.uk
Sent:September 25, 2016 3:16 PM
To:cb.li...@gmail.com; deles...@gmail.com
Cc:nanog@nanog.org; j...@aharp.iorc.depaul.edu
Subject:Re: Krebs on Security booted off Akamai network after DDoS atta
s to buy from anyone on the list.
works well, and less dodgy-ness, since everyone on the list has been
vetted (to some degree) by ARIN.
--jim
--
Jim Mercer Reptilian Research j...@reptiles.org+1 416 410-5633
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of
arriving
e of a pile of transfers from /24's to a /16,
both inside ARIN, as well as a couple out of ARIN into RIPE.
also did some with brokers (iptrading.com), as well as direct deals.
as long as all the documentation is straight, the process seems to move along
cleanly.
--jim
--
Jim Mercer
Can we please not get the government ( who's gov ) involved. I fully agree
that it will not only not help, but will make some things worse. This is
why we can't have nice things.
On Tuesday, October 4, 2016, Anne Mitchell wrote:
> (Interesting and inarguably well-intentioned, and possibly even
ugh goodness knows they should, and maybe eventually they will. In
the meantime, we have what Zeynep Tufekci has called the "Internet of
Hacked Things" (anybody want to help get the acronym IoHT into general
currency?).
Jim
It is also likely the desired use case. In my office I like to be able to
login when needed when on the road, when the alarm company calls me at 2am
for a false alarm so I don't have to get someone else out of bed to have
them dispatched to check on the site.
-jim
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at
Sure, but now we put it outside the skill level of 99.99% of the people
that don't read and understand this list.
-jim
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Luke Guillory
wrote:
> VPNs can accomplish this without opening ports directly to devices.
>
> Luke
>
>
> *Sent from m
Sure lets sue people because they put too many/bad packets/packets I don't
like on the internet. Do you think this will really solve the porblem? Do
you think we'll not just all end up with internet prices like US medical
care prices?
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 4:41 PM, wrote:
>
> >So once identi
I've heard this crap for 20+ years now. "attack traffic" is unplanned
traffic. Build networks to support "random" bursts of garbage is much more
expensive then you will ever get to bill for. You clearly have no
understanding of the economics of networks.
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Keith
So device is certified, bug is found 2 years later. How does this help.
The info to date is last week's issue was patched by the vendor in Sept
2015, I believe is what I read. We know bugs will creep in, (source anyone
that has worked with code forever) Also certification assuming it would
work,
On 10/27/16 22:59, b...@theworld.com wrote:
What would the manufacturers' response be if this virus had instead
just shut down, possibly in some cases physically damaged the devices
or otherwise caused them to cease functioning ever again (wiped all
their software or broke their bootability), rat
On 10/30/16 06:35, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:07:17AM -0500, Jim Hickstein wrote:
A virus that kills its host (too much of the time) is not successful.
True. On the other hand:
"Some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money.
The
Hugo,
I've used this configuration in a past line when I may of had multiple L2
steps between L3 devices. The only concern we had was around load BFD put
on _some_ endpoint routers, if was handles on the RouteProcessor vs on line
cards.
-jim
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Hugo Sla
1 - 100 of 625 matches
Mail list logo
