On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:17 PM, John Levine wrote:
>>Almost everyone are basically just selling an "activation" with one of the
>>SSL certificate authorities.
>>
>>I usually buy a "RapidSSL" (Verisign) certificate from
>>https://www.sslmatrix.com/ -- they seem to have some of the best
>>prices
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:49 PM, George Herbert
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:17 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> The problem with anything related to Verisign at the moment is that
>
>> The possibility of their r
Brothers' are fine; buy the tapes that have the split-down-the-middle
backing on them.
It reduces the unpeeling problem from
more-time-than-the-label-took-to-type-in to about 2 seconds. You just
grab the edges at an end and bend it, so the backing bulges outwards,
and off it starts to come.
-ge
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 16/02/2012 21:14, George Herbert wrote:
>> Brothers' are fine; buy the tapes that have the split-down-the-middle
>> backing on them.
>>
>> It reduces the unpeeling problem from
>> more-time-tha
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Jason Chambers wrote:
> On 2/16/12 5:03 AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>> Nanosecond Trading Could Make Markets Go Haywire
>> http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/02/high-speed-trading/
>>
>> "Below the 950-millisecond level, where computerized trading occurs so
>>
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Aled Morris"
>
>> On 17 February 2012 18:43, Eric Tykwinski
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for GBICs, SFPs
>
>> You'll need to be carrying a lot of loose change then :-)
>
> In fact, vending machines with builtin
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:44 PM, George Carey wrote:
>
>>
>> The vending machine should use a card like an ATM/gift card, not accept
>> cash. You should be able to "charge" the card with some cash via a web
>> portal and keep the card in the facility in your space. If something is
>> needed,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:00 PM, George Herbert
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:44 PM, George Carey wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The vending machine should use a card like an ATM/gift card, not accept
>>> cash. You should be able to "charge" the card wit
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:28 AM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
>>> On Feb 26, 2012, at 4:56 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
>>> > 1. Full redundancy with instant failover to other hypervisor hosts
>>> > upon hardware failure (I thought this was a given
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:45 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:19 PM, George Herbert
> wrote:
>> Failing to have central shared storage (iSCSI, NAS, SAN, whatever you
>> prefer) fails the smell test on a local enterprise-grade
>> virtualization clu
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:59 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>
> Yes, well, that's why we're still using a layer 4 protocol (TCP) that
> can't dynamically rebind to the protocol level below (IP).
This is somewhat irritating, but on the scale of 0 (all is well) to 10
(you want me to do WHAT with DH
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> On 2/27/2012 7:53 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>>>
>>> I think you're more likely to find a network engineer with (possibly
>>> limited)
>>> > programming skills.
>>
>> I wish. For the past three months I've been trying to find a network
>> eng
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Monday, February 27, 2012 07:53:07 PM William Herrin wrote:
>> .../SCI clearance.
>>
>> The clearance is killing me. The two generalists didn't have a
>> clearance and the cleared applicants are programmers or admins but
>> never both.
>
> I
Out of curiosity -
Is it possible it's a command and control network, rather than
directly an attack?
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Chris Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Matthew Huff wrote:
>> Anyone else see a massive increase of scanning/dos with TCP source and/or
>> dst por
Isabel -
It does not take a PhD in computer science to understand networks or
network protocol design. It does not take a PhD to understand that
the troll's particular proposal was not a competent well-founded
contribution.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:25 AM, isabel dias wrote:
> are you a PhD? ot
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> I have a couple of wiring projects coming up on salt water-going vessels and
> I'm curious as to people's experiences with different types of cable marking
> products in a high-humidity / salt air / bilge environment
>
> None of the marke
Under the circumstances...
I would tend to do a two-phase solution.
1. At both ends, above the bilge area, put the most durable printed
labels you can find.
2. Both at the ends, and intermittently under the deck, use a coded
ID number for each cable using those slip-on crimp-on types (the
cabl
This tactic is extremely well known by spammers. Either sending from the blocks
or hosting questionable client web (usually spammed URLs).
There really isn't much else people try with this stuff.
Yes, the space quickly goes on *BLs. They don't care; they get more and leave
you holding the poop.
If the LIRs cannot get separate allocations from the RIR (and separate
ASNs) for this usage, something is wrong.
We want to make things as simple and efficient as possible, but no
simpler or more efficient, because the curves go back up again at that
point, and we all suffer.
-george
On Fri, Ma
What, senior network people testing out new test/transitional space at
home before they test it at work is bad?
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Jérôme Nicolle wrote:
> Le 15/03/12 07:59, Randy Bush a écrit :
>> and i have configured two home LANs to use it
>
> So wrong...
>
> --
> Jérôme Nic
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
>
> More like "wasting no time in fulfilling the prophesy that people will
> treat it like just another rfc1918 space and deploy it wherever they want".
>
> not that randy is likely to get bitten because he's not behind a cgn
> nor is he p
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:21 AM, wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:56:46 -, Brandon Butterworth said:
>> > I'd be quite interested in seeing the MTTR for a sub-ice cable break which
>> > happened in late october.
>>
>> More fun too when we get global warming under control and there's no
>> lon
The physics is not conducive to improving the situation a lot.
There's probably $1.5 billion in the ground already in neutrino
detectors; the total combined detector bit rate is pretty poor. One
experiment looking at neutrinos coming off the Fermilab accelerator
had 473 million accelerator pulses
>From the abstract: "The link achieved a decoded data rate of 0.1
bits/sec with a bit error rate of 1% over a distance of 1.035 km,
including 240 m of earth."
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.2847v1.pdf
For practical communications, at longer distances, you probably lose
beam intensity as a 1/R^2 funct
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Marshall Eubanks
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:14 PM, wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:16:59 -0700, George Herbert said:
>>> The physics is not conducive to improving the situation a lot.
>>>
>>> There's proba
This seems like a very 1999 anti-spam attitude.
I have been doing anti-spam a long long time - literally since before Canter
and Siegel (who I had as customers...) and before j...@cup.portal.com.
It's not 1999 anymore. Patrick is not the enemy. Your attitude is worrying. The
"I am not respons
With RAID 4, the parity disk IOPS on write will rate-limit the whole LUN...
No big deal on a 4-drive LUN; terror on a 15-drive LUN...
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 14, 2012, at 8:04, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Jeroen van Aart said:
>> There may be a performan
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> You can also look at a machine like this:
>
> http://www.supermicro.com/products/chassis/4U/417/SC417E16-R1400U.cfm
>
> Jared Mauch
>
> On Apr 12, 2012, at 5:47 PM, Matthew Luckie wrote:
>
>>> 1) My goal is to store the traffic may be fore eve
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:42 PM, wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 13:09:09 -0700, Leo Bicknell said:
>
>> "In 1988, while employed by DEC, he started working on the popular
>> internet domain name server BIND, of which he was the primary author and
>> architect, until release 8."
>>
>> ISC ha
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Brett Watson wrote:
> On May 23, 2012, at 18:27, George Herbert wrote:
>> Please don't make me remember hosts.txt before I've had a chance to
>> wrap up work, go home, and get some Scotch in...
>>
>
> Come on George, ho
It's past given that large entities that can forge the use of BIND; at that
point, engineering aside, Paul's point that the market and code have spoken is
hard to deny.
Sucks when it works against us...
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
On May 28, 2012, at 12:52, Jay Ashworth wrote
On May 28, 2012, at 22:59, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:38:23PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>
>> Putting it another way, the ISP doesn't want to be fooled even if
>> it is fooling its customers.
>
>don't lie to us, but we lie to our customers.
>
>
I am as amused by antispam efforts as anyone, but can we stay on list topic?
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 13, 2012, at 19:39, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jun 13, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Joe Greco wrote:
>
>>> A trick to do on mail (USPS) spammers is ta
Late reply, but:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Lynda wrote:
>...
> Second, and more important. I *was* a "computer science guy" in a past life,
> and this is nonsense. You can have astonishingly large software projects
> that just continue to run smoothly, day in, day out, and they don't hit
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Greg D. Moore wrote:
> At 03:08 PM 7/2/2012, George Herbert wrote:
>
> If folks have not read it, I would suggest reading Normal Accidents by
> Charles Perrow.
>
> The "it can't happen" is almost guaranteed to happen. ;-) And whe
On Jul 2, 2012, at 7:19 PM, Rodrick Brown wrote:
> People are acting as if Netflix is part of some critical service they stream
> movies for Christ sake. Some acceptable level of loss is fine for 99.99% of
> Netflix's user base just like cable, electricity and running water I suffer a
> f
On Jul 3, 2012, at 10:38 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Steven Bellovin"
>
>> Subject: Re: FYI Netflix is down
>> On Jul 2, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Greg D. Moore wrote:
>>
>>> At 03:08 PM 7/2/2012, George Herbert w
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> Most people operate on the assumption that there are 86400*365.25 seconds per
> year overall and that every day is 86,400 seconds. UTC matches that common
> conception of time. UT1 does not because UT1 monotonically increments one
> sec
On Jul 4, 2012, at 3:29 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> Yeah but what you don't understand is that manual navigation after a
> certain point of difference becomes inaccurate to a degree that is
> unacceptable by most military standards.
Manual navigation (sextant, etc) is dead. It's not taugh
On Jul 5, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Darius Jahandarie wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Oliver Garraux wrote:
>> Seems fairly straightforward to me. It'll break path MTU discovery.
>
> Since Bill said "(not IP in general, TCP specifically)", I don't think
> PMTUD breaking is what he's look
On Jul 5, 2012, at 8:14 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> And, by the way, the deformations and exchanges of angular momentum
> that drive Earth rotation variations are probably the best understood
> global geophysical processes there are. Absolutely no magic is
> required.
Not the tectonic o
On Jul 5, 2012, at 5:32 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>
>> 5. What is the reason for the 100m distance limit within an ethernet
>> collision domain?
>
> What's an ethernet collision domain? Seriously, when was the last time
> you dealt with a half duplex ethernet?
>
Last time I built a clu
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 23:25, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>> The Friday afternoon cynic in me says it's because it's a move with positive
>> paybacks. There's 3 basic possibilities:
>>
>> 1) You send the puffed resume to a company with clue, it get
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Steven Noble wrote:
> On Jul 6, 2012, at 4:16 PM, George Herbert wrote:
>
>> 6) Puffed it up a little (worked with Cisco routers, but in the 7200
>> era, and hasn't categorized skills as recent / older), but hasn't
>> outright lie
On Jul 7, 2012, at 11:13 AM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 11:01:29AM -0700, JC Dill wrote:
>> On 06/07/12 9:06 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
Maybe it's more significant to ask what the difference between TCP and UDP
is.
>>> Yes, the difference between TCP and UDP is a
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Matt Griswold wrote:
> * Jon Lewis [120710 12:37 -0400]:
>> Yahoo? Don't hold your breath. The person appears to have been
>> using the same yahoo account for all the nig nog messages. Why
>> whoever has admin rights to the mailing list hasn't
>> removed/banned
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Diogo Montagner
wrote:
> Hi Darius,
>
> You are right. The lost of a customer due to those things. However, I
> would classify this as an unknown situation (in terms of risk
> analisys) because the others I mentioned are possible to calculate and
> estimate (they ar
Friends don't let friends binary shift.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Jamie Bowden wrote:
> What's an order of magnitude between friends?
>
> Very occasionally yours,
>
> --
> Jamie Bowden(ja...@photon.com)
> Sr. Sys. Admin. (703) 243-6613 x3848
> Photon Research Associates,
If anyone's ISPs are overcharging them, I will be able to provide
service for no more than 1 cent per available routable IPv6 address in
any netblock from /64 on up. We have a reasonable startup rate of a
/56 for the price of a /64 for the remainder of 2012, even!
-george
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:11:49 -0500, Grant Ridder said:
>> I love spam from Honduras. I am hoping that someone is going to kick this
>> email from the members list.
>
> I'm hoping for something a tad more drastic. The bozo has an upstream, and
> this
> i
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:06 PM, wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, George Herbert wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:11:49 -0500, Grant Ridder said:
>>>>
>>>> I love spam from Honduras. I am
On Aug 22, 2012, at 10:36 PM, Dan White wrote:
> I also noticed a couple of subnets in that range showing up in the weekly
> Cidr reports, beginning in July.
Tests to see how bad /8 filters were before allocating the /12?
Just curious...
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
For anyone not already familiar, go sign up at:
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Blake Dunlap wrote:
> I suggest subscribing to outages. They are chatting about such a fiber cut,
> and are generally the place to look for major outage level event
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 8:41 AM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
>> Is using /24 a must to protect (a bit) against route hijacking?
>
> Hi Anurag,
>
> Not only is it _not_ a must, it doesn't work and it impairs your
> ability to detect the fault.
>
>
On Sep 4, 2012, at 12:07 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> You are. You should be doing SMTP Auth to *your* email server on which
> you have an authorized account and then letting it relay your messages
> to the world.
This is not the thread for this conversation per se. The practicality of
gene
On Sep 13, 2012, at 7:37 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On 2012-09-13 16:29 , Jay Ashworth wrote:
> [..]
>> If not, do any of the people who've already done have 5 minutes to chime in
>> on what they did and what they learned?
>
> You might want to go through the network presentations given for
I'm having problems finding any announcements for this net 10/8, too. Can
someone talk to these "IANA" folks about reclaiming it, too? They have a bunch
of other space in 172.x they should be able to use...
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 18, 2012, at 8:36 AM, "John Levine
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:29 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, james jones wrote:
>
>> Are we still talking about this? I setup a lan at home once at that used
>> 6/8 :)
>
>
> They have nuclear weapons, too. Just saying.
Which, the Army? I don't believe that's true anymore. I th
Ok, as exciting as this all has been, it's grossly off topic now.
Please retire the conversation to direct emails if you all want to
keep arguing over it, m'kay?
Thanks...
-george
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
>
>> From: William Herrin
>> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:04
As the subsequent discussion here shows, "unused" is a press inaccuracy.
The nets are in active use; much of that use is not publicly advertised, but
it's still in use.
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 19, 2012, at 1:35 PM, "Robert Guerra" wrote:
> Am I correct in assuming th
On Sep 19, 2012, at 9:58 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> There is still no technical reason that 240/4 cannot be
> rehabilitated, other than continued immaterial objections to doing
> anything at all with 240/4, and given the rate of IPv6 adoption thus
> far, if not for those, it could possibly be r
On Sep 20, 2012, at 12:21 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 9/20/12 12:09 AM, George Herbert wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 19, 2012, at 9:58 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
>>
>>> There is still no technical reason that 240/4 cannot be
>>> rehabilitated, other than c
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
>
>
> George Herbert wrote:
>
>> We could have started it at a more opportune time in the past. We could
>> also have done other things like a straight IPv4-48 or IPv4-64, without the
>> other protocol suite f
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> On 19-Sep-12 03:46, Alex Harrowell wrote:
>> On the other hand, the scarcity is of *globally unique routable*
>> addresses. You can make a case that private use of (non-RFC1918) IPv4
>> resources is wasteful in itself at the moment. To be pr
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:58:09AM -0400, Darius
> Jahandarie wrote:
>> I recall 40Gbit/s Ethernet being promoted heavily for similar reasons
>> as the ones in this article, but then 100Gbit/s being the technology
>> that
My customer the Dark Matter local galaxy group beg to disagree; just because
you cannot see them does not mean that you cannot feel them gravitationally.
Or route to them.
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 28, 2012, at 10:31 PM, "John R. Levine" wrote:
>> You won't have enoug
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Tony Hain wrote:
>> Sadiq Saif [mailto:sa...@asininetech.com] wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Chris Campbell
>> wrote:
>> > Is anyone aware of any historical documentation relating to the choice of
>> > 32
>> bits for an IPv4 address?
>> >
>> > Chee
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Izaac wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:52:57PM +0200, Seth Mos wrote:
>> "Pick a number between this and that." It's the 80's and you can
>> still count the computers in the world. :)
>
> And yet, almost concurrently, IEEE 802 went with forty-eight bits. Go
> f
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
>
> --- j...@baylink.com wrote:
> From: Jay Ashworth
>
> So the address space for IPv8 will be...
>
> -
>
>
> Jim says:
>
> "IPv8 - 43 bits (3+8+32)
>
> There is a natural routing hierarchy with
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Oct 3, 2012, at 3:49 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
>
>> On 10/3/12, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>>> So the address space for IPv8 will be...
>>>
>>
>> In 100 years, when we start to run out of IPv6 addresses, possibly we
>> will have learned our lesson
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Barry Shein wrote:
>
> In Singapore in June 2011 I gave a talk at HackerSpaceSG about just
> doing away with IP addresses entirely, and DNS.
>
> Why not just use host names directly as addresses? Bits is bits, FQDNs
> are integers because, um, bits is bits. They're
As I said earlier, names' structure does not map to network or physical
location structure.
DNS is who; IP is where. Both are reasonably efficient now as separate
entities. Combining them will wreck one. You're choosing to wreck routing
(where), which to backbone people sounds frankly stark
On Oct 6, 2012, at 11:35 AM, Barry Shein wrote:
>
> We can map from host names to ip addresses to routing actions, right?
>
> So clearly they're not unrelated or independent variables. There's a
> smooth function from hostname->ipaddr->routing.
No.
Not just no, but hell no at the asserted c
Ancedotally, for users of an e-gadget company's website, cellphone
company's outbound web proxies, internet games company, and
image-intensive home furnishings website, the CGNs delivered content
faster than the main website could, regardless of increasing its
bandwidth. Latency problems with the
Sorry, at a conference and not paying enough attention to email. My bad.
-george
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Cutler James R
wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2012, at 4:56 PM, George Herbert wrote:
>> Ancedotally, for users of an e-gadget company's website, cellphone
>> company&#x
Yes, multiple reports on the outages list, which you should also join.
Short summary: WI and Washington state separate fiber cuts.
-george
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Eric Rosenberry
wrote:
> Looks like Sprint is having a very bad day today in the NW?
>
> Anybody able to elaborate on exac
management
is at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch) but managed by Vivendra Rode.
-george william herbert
george.herb...@gmail.com
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:19 PM, George Herbert
wrote:
> Yes, multiple reports on the outages list, which you should also join.
>
> Short summary: WI and Washing
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Sean Harlow wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote:
>
>>
>> Maybe because he has 130 sites and 130 truck rolls is not cheap. Also
>> company policy says no.
>>
>>
> You are correct that deploying to a number of sites isn't cheap, but the
> a
Modeled with just simple FTP sessions?
Ugh: they admitted to having MIT backbone packet traces to analyze, and then
used that simple of a simulator...
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 23, 2012, at 8:29 PM, Rodrick Brown wrote:
> "With coded TCP, blocks of packets are clumped
iPhone
On Oct 23, 2012, at 8:57 PM, "Michael Painter" wrote:
> George Herbert wrote:
>> Modeled with just simple FTP sessions?
>>
>> Ugh: they admitted to having MIT backbone packet traces to analyze, and then
>> used that simple of a simulator...
>
>
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:07 AM, wrote:
>
> corruption!
>
>
> http://mina.naguib.ca/blog/2012/10/22/the-little-ssh-that-sometimes-couldnt.html
>
>
> /bill
This is an excellent full-stack debugging war story.
Thanks for posting it, Bill.
--
-george william herbert
george.herb...@gmail.com
Oh, horrors, part of my infrastructure needs raw socket data?
We should ban that, for security. Who needs those pesky switches anyways?
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 6, 2012, at 5:49 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 05:38:32AM -0800,
> Owen DeLong
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
>> From: Blake Dunlap
>> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:20:35 -0600
>>_
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Mike A wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:59:18AM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>> > > Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for any
crossreplying to outages list.
Is anyone ELSE seeing GPS issues? This could well have been an
unrelated issue on that particular PBX.
If this was real, then the mother of all infrastructure attacks might
be underway...
One glitch on tick and tock and one malfunctioning PBX is not
sufficient evi
On Nov 20, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
.
>
> I've also been looking at an item like this:
>
> http://www.netburnerstore.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=PK70EX-NTP
>
> which is about $300 + misc parts.
>
> Should be well worth it to avoid a 'major outage' that some folks had wi
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>
> For myself, I usually pick the first three in us.pool.ntp.org, tick and tock,
> time.nist.gov, and a couple of regionally appropriate large universities.
As this week indicated, perhaps tick and tock are not sufficiently far
apart to be
As a reminder - time infrastructure is not recommended for
virtualization. Make them physicals.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Blake Dunlap wrote:
> That's what happens when you just follow vendor recommendations blindly. If
> you do follow that on vm's (which can actually be a good practice)
You should restate the "predates"; I was on console on earthquake.berkeley.edu
at the time Loma Prieta let go, using among other things (then) Forumnet (now)
ICB in a chat, and one of the immediate damage indications was that everyone at
UC Santa Cruz dropped offline.
Topic important, though, I
On Oct 19, 2014, at 6:19, "Jay Ashworth" wrote:
>>
>> How widespread were the effects on backbone communication circuits from
>> those quakes?
>>
>>> On October 18, 2014 3:22:58 PM EDT, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>>>
>>>> O
> On Oct 21, 2014, at 6:03 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>
> GNOME is probably the linchpin.
>
> But it's not just RH. It's Debian, and by extension *buntu, and SuSE, and
> at least one other major independent parent distro that I can't think of
> just now...
>
> And as far as I know, it's done
> On Oct 22, 2014, at 9:30 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>
> The people that like systemd (like myself) have wisely learned that
> the people that hate systemd, hate it mostly because it's different
> from what came before and don't want to change. There's no way to
> argue rationally with that.
Ok. As a highly on- list-topic example of why distrust is called for...
Without referring to the systemd source code*, does anyone know what systemd
uses to select between networking subsystems (i.e. NetworkManager, the new
standard as of RHEL 7, vs /etc/ sysconfig/network-scripts/, etc.).
"Nobody will ever need more than 64K...M...G..."
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 10, 2014, at 4:24 PM, Izaac wrote:
>
>> On November 10, 2014 4:49:08 PM EST, lobna gouda
>> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Any recommendation, not looking for anything fantasy, my understanding
>> it sh
He didn't hack the registry, he hijacked its records. And this is far from the
first time a registry account was hacked. But, yeah, *still* not secure enough.
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 24, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Randy Epstein wrote:
>
>> On 11/24/14, 5:08 PM, "Michael
And that was July 1997 not 96, though that does nothing to make me feel younger
...
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 24, 2014, at 4:16 PM, George Herbert wrote:
>
>
> He didn't hack the registry, he hijacked its records. And this is far from
> the f
> On Nov 24, 2014, at 4:18 PM, Randy Epstein wrote:
>
> Actually, he didn’t hack its records either. He exploited a bug in BIND.
...returned a legit response plus a tacked-on glue record for www.internic.net
anytime you queried his nameserver, which he tricked people into doing with
mixt
Emulating game traffic... Good luck with that. You'll probably have to figure
it out and build your own models per service, though a lot is encapsulated in
https.
In terms of showing it to the public, look at Zabbix and Zenoss; both do
dashboards and managing multiple realtime monitoring / pe
Cruel, cruel man.
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 19, 2015, at 6:56 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
>
> SSL is no problem. We just had a whole thread about breaking it. :-)
>
>
>> On January 19, 2015 5:16:43 PM CST, George Herbert
>> wrote
I wasn't the implementing engineer but I've been at two places that did that, a
larger game company and a network gear manufacturer in their engineering
support computational hubs. I was there during planning and rollout at the
game company, very early in the Nexus lifespan.
Both sites brough
> Brandon Ewing wrote:
>
>> David Bass wrote:
>> The n2k ToR is not a great design for user or storage interfaces if most of
>> your traffic is east/west. It is great as a low cost ilo/drac/choose your
>> oob port, or if most of your traffic is north/south. Biggest thing to
>> remember i
101 - 200 of 262 matches
Mail list logo
