Colin Alston wrote:
On 2008/11/04 10:32 PM Charles Wyble wrote:
Obviously as they are consumer connections, I wouldn't get a BGP feed
so would need to download a copy, which has the risk of stale data.
Perhaps some sort of multihop BGP setup?
I have done some research and found a l
devang patel wrote:
Hi,
Does any vendor support the MPLS for native IPv6 network?
I think the bigger question is what vendors support native IPv6 networks
and at what stage
of maturity. :)
I was working on one testing scenario where I have Cisco 7200 routers and
whole network is running
devang patel wrote:
Hi,
Does any vendor support the MPLS for native IPv6 network?
I was working on one testing scenario where I have Cisco 7200 routers and
whole network is running only IPv6 and I wanted to run MPLS on the top of
that but I found MPLS is not supported on IPv6 networks? is that t
Charles Wyble wrote:
Colin Alston wrote:
On 2008/11/04 10:32 PM Charles Wyble wrote:
Obviously as they are consumer connections, I wouldn't get a BGP
feed so would need to download a copy, which has the risk of stale
data. Perhaps some sort of multihop BGP setup?
I have done some res
Lamar Owen wrote:
Charles Wyble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We know they can partition at any time.
We know that certain players have a history of causing this to happen
more then others.
What I haven't seen discussed in any great detail, is how to limit those
events.
ssue
you are facing is specific with every network you are announcing or
just one or two networks. As for who would assist, this request is
suppose to go through:
AT&T MIS Maintenance
888-613-6330 Prompt-3, 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
charles
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts
> what you're calling a political failure could be what others
> call a rate war.
I didn't really
On to the question about how network operators can help LE: *Collect the data that proves a company such as Intercage/McColo is harboring cybercriminals* and get with your local FBI/Secret Service field office (or your state's Attorney General's office) (or both) and submit a complaint at IC3's w
Anyone seeing or have an insight as to what is going on with Sprint?
Connectivity very sporadic. Very high latency.
Found some corroborating evidence here:
http://www.internetpulse.net/
Chuck
This e-mail message and any files transmitted with it contain confidential
informati
Well...our connectivity problems out of Pittsburgh have went from
sporadic, skipped bad and worse and are at critical.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Werber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 4:47 PM
To: Justin M. Streiner; Mills, Charles
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED
lears up but
reachability to any site that is on their network or uses them for
transit is iffy at best.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Werber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 4:47 PM
To: Justin M. Streiner; Mills, Charles
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: S
George William Herbert wrote:
Johnny writes:
This discussion about plants, waterfalls and humidity is getting more
and more off-tropic...
Humidity is not off topic for a general or specific datacenter
conversation - it's a fairly routine issue in facilities.
*woosh*
tropic... not
Deepak Jain wrote:
I bet the military or emergency services can establish a 10km fiber
stretch in a few hours. Replacing some telecom hw and set it up from
scratch would probably take weeks (I'm not talking about a single
router
here).
But we aren't talking about the military here, are we?
Their other pages (finance.yahoo.com) and such seem to resolve ok.
Wondering if it isn't part of a bigger problem because I got a complaint
that many sites
Were unreachable for a bit.
Chuck
Charles L. Mills
Senior Network Engineer
Access Data Corporation / Pittsburgh, PA 15238
(412) 968
In the past, an inactive cell phone could still dial 911. I'm not sure
if that's still the case, but it used to be, at least with some
carriers.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Russell J. Lahti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 7:47 AM
To: 'Mike Lyon'; 'Alex R
Jeff Shultz wrote
I've been getting an fair number of e-mails (up from zero) from
customers asking about spam they are getting with their e-mail address
being in the From: address. I know that this has always been
happening, I'm just wondering if it's been buried under the McColo
stuff so th
Is that an off the shelf tool or custom built?
I help a buddy who works for a small ISP. I believe they're ignoring or
null routing large chunks of APNIC. Their customers are aware of the
policy, and cool with it. Port scanning and other malicious stuff
dropped 50% afterwards.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Skywing [mailto:skyw..
-Original Message-
From: wingying [mailto:wingy...@umich.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 1:54 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Cc: Xu (Simon) Chen
Subject: out-of-band access bandwidth
>Hi all,
>A quick question, what is the common bandwidth for out-of-band access?
>Thanks.
Probably depend
You all may wish to check your logs for 202.108.12.112, it could be a
new target; although I only saw two requests from it.
--
Charles Morris
cmor...@cs.odu.edu,
cmor...@occs.odu.edu
Network Security Administrator,
Software Developer
Office of Computing and Communications
I want to advertise my /22 to two different ISP on different POP.
I can't use BGP as ISP1 doesn't support it.
Any suggestions ?
Thanks,
Charles
Quick questions.
If both ISP publish my /22, what will happen if ISP1 goes down ?
Half the internet won't be able to reach me ? I'll have to call them
to remove the route manually ?
Charles.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Charles Regan wrote:
> Hmmm, McNamara descendent ?
>
rote:
> im curiouse. you probably had a reason for wanting to do that. So cant you
> find another ISP that will do what you want?
>
> Cheers
> Marla
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Regan [mailto:charles.re...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 0
he capability to advertise the OP's
>> route in the first place.
>>
>> What if ISP1 is simply a customer of another ISP, using PA space, and
>> just reselling connectivity?
>>
>> Charles, you really need to find out what others have asked... can the
&
What if both annonce my /22 unweighted ?
I know I will loose failover in this scenario.
I am trying to figure out what will happen, traffic will flow inbound
from both in a round-robin like method ?
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Charles Regan wrote:
> The can't do BGP.
> They
Make sure MRTG is using SNMPv2 when it does its data gathering otherwise
you'll suffer from counter rollover.
-Original Message-
From: Deric Kwok [mailto:deric.kwok2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 1:44 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Networking performance
Hi
I would li
hat they can
do. There's a chance...
I will also have to scale up. I don't think my Soekris with OpenBSD
can handle two full route of the Internet.
Any suggestions ?
Charles
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
> Re Charles,
>
> this is all about control, so y
we do now ? Any suggestions ?
Charles
The problem we have now is that we got our /22 from arin to do multihoming.
If we dump tlb, no more multihoming? No /22. Is that correct?
We also have a contract with tlb.
$$$ 1.5yrs left...
2009/2/13, Seth Mattinen :
> Charles Regan wrote:
>> Isp2 is vtl not bell
>>
>
All,
Looking for a recommendation on DSLAMs to replace our unsupported
Cisco 6015s. Requirements are:
G.SHDSL 2 and 4 wire mode (CPEs are strictly Cisco 828, 878, and small
cisco routers using WIC-1SHDSL and the V2/V3 of them)
QOS would be nice, not a necessity
SNMPv3 and SSHv2 support
IPv
free to look at our online collection of BGP Community guides.
Some are more extensive than others and some intentionally leave off
internal identifers.
http://www.onesc.net/communities
As a yearly request, if anybody knows of guides out there that we do
not have listed, please let me know.
thanks,
charles
I ran into exactly the same thing during a code upgrade a few weeks ago.
I wrote it off as a bug in BGP and backed off the code until a new release was
out. I was also running 12.4(22)T
On an NPE-G2.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Renaud RAKOTOMALALA [mailto:ren...@rakotomalala.com]
S
s did not
capture a random distribution of network events, as the probes are
triggered every N minutes. BRIX randomizes the probes within a
configurable window, so that, over time, all time intervals are covered
by the accumulated probes.
--
Charles N Wyble char...@thewybles.com
(818)280-7059
This seems similiar to Cisco performance routing.
See
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps8787/products_ios_protocol_option_home.html
for more.
Tim Utschig wrote:
Talari
Networks
--
Charles N Wyble char...@thewybles.com
(818)280-7059 http://charlesnw.blogspot.com
CTO SocalWiFI.net
lla
t...@bluegrass.net
BluegrassNet
Voice (502) 589.INET [4638]
Fax 502-315-0581
321 East Breckinridge St
Louisville KY 40203
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.5/1979 - Release Date: 03/11/09
20:42:00
--
Charles N Wyble
Yes I agree. I forgot to do the *raises an incredulous eyebrow* bit. :)
By the way try calling that number and reaching an operator then
asking for the NOC.
chris.ra...@nokia.com wrote:
More likely spoofed sources.
Good luck.
oming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.5/1979 - Release Date: 03/11/09
20:42:00
--
Charles N Wyble char...@thewybles.com
(818)280-7059 http://charlesnw.blogspot.com
CTO SocalWiFI.net
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:56:26 PDT, Mike Lyon said:
Howdy,
I am wondering what folks are recommending/using these days for Linux SSL
proxies? I need to build a linux box that basically acts as an SSL offloader
would (like a BigIP / Cisco ACE / Netscaler would do).
Can we please get this thread closed or something?
Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 23:17, Joe Greco wrote:
"Looking around" Rockefeller Center generally isn't a crime.
"Looking around" where you're in my back yard and peeking in the windows
is, at a minimum, trespass, and if our
I usually just call their toll free support number when their are
occasional issues. This is from a content provider perspective (using
Akamai as a CDN for the sites I support). Never had an issue getting a
hold of anyone and getting the issue resolved (two times I have called
them, it was iss
While researching at&t and ipv6 I came across
http://www.feise.com/~jfeise/blogs/index.php?blog=8 and also
http://www.corp.att.com/gov/solution/network_services/data_nw/ipv6/
Looks like they have established a tunnel in the United States perhaps?
I realize that getting native v6 support to DSL
Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Charles Wyble wrote:
While researching at&t and ipv6 I came across
http://www.feise.com/~jfeise/blogs/index.php?blog=8 and also
doesn't that blog basically say: "it's broke Jim..." and that 7018
(really 7132
yea... maybe they do, I don't see that from my view of 7018's routing
data (limited as it may be)
Interesting.
http://www.corp.att.com/gov/solution/network_services/data_nw/ipv6/
Looks like they have established a tunnel in the United States perhaps?
how did you gather that? Maybe Tom
Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:46:50 +0100
Daniel Verlouw wrote:
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 09:34 -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
It's working for me, too, though I noticed that tcptraceroute (at
least the version I have) doesn't do well with ipv6.google.com.
seems to work fi
have to pass a default route, either via iBGP or via your IGP (as
the one exception).Also, since you are doing this via BGP
Communities when additional routes are learned from your external
peers, those routes would not be passed onto your aggregation routers.
charles
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Jeffrey Negro wrote:
No ETA given to me, just the stock line of "We apologize.. blah blah...
as soon as possible.. blah blah."
This is probably a good time to remind the uninitiated to have some
secondary DNS with a totally separate company if your DNS is that
important
Joe Abley wrote:
Hi all,
Anybody here have experience shipping pre-built cabinets, with ~20U of
routers and servers installed, connected and tested, to remote sites for
deployment?
Not pre built cabinets, but I have shipped/received over $1,000,000.00
worth of gear (routers/switches/desk
Sending that one full rack has proven successful for us, but that
was specialists with some experience, and it was road only. Every
time I see suitcases being thrown around in airports...well...
Baggage handlers have nothing on FedEX folks. They literally hurl
packages into the truck like b
Been troubleshooting a very strange problem for a couple of weeks now.
I have a few hundred systems deployed throughout the United States
utilizing EVDO connectivity with Verizon as a carrier. They are stationary.
Over the past few weeks clusters of them in SF and Lewisville TX and a
few othe
Do they maintain a continuous data link in normal operation (like, say,
connectivity for a LAN, or backhaul for a camera or some such), or do they
request the data link when they need to send [whatever] (like a discrete SCADA
system)? My (user only) experience is that cellular data service
USB dongle (model 720) from the system and
place it in his laptop. Came up and worked fine once vzaccess twiddled
whatever bits it needed to.
Charles Wyble wrote:
Been troubleshooting a very strange problem for a couple of weeks now.
I have a few hundred systems deployed throughout the Uni
Well if we pull apart the article a bit
Quote 1)
Network infrastructure security has been in the limelight lately, with
researchers uncovering big vulnerabilities in the Domain Name System
(DNS), the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), TCP, and in Cisco routers.
Wasn't aware of any big vuln
Wayne E. Bouchard wrote:
Meh...
Sure, it rehashes what we pretty well already know, "If a bad guy can
get access to your network or your management tools, you're boned."
Naturally. If one gets to the control plane of your routers and/or
management network you have big problems. :)
However
Ravi Pina wrote:
News coverage:
http://cow.org/r/?5459
http://cow.org/r/?545a
And not that I expect any useful updates:
http://twitter.com/attnews
Lots of folks covering the same thing...
http://search.twitter.com/search?q=fiber+cut
http://search.twitter.com/search?q=outage
Also report
Yeah. It's on outages. Not much useful there.
Christopher Morrow wrote:
isn't there a mailing list for this sort of thing? outages@ I think it is?
(not that I mind, just a little advert for the appropriate forum, and
a place that MAY have some useful info on this topic)
-chris
On Thu, Apr 9, 2
Yep it leads to:
Activity Type Code Desc: PROGRESS COMMENTS
Activity Type Code: PROG
OTDR readings were taken by AT&T West and a cut was located 1600 ft from
the San Jose, CA central office. AT&T West technicians are onsite
working to isolate the exact location of the cut. There are 4 ca
Seriously though I want to start some discussion around outside plant
protection. This isn't the middle of the ocean or desert after all.
There were multiple fiber cuts in a major metropolitan area, resulting
in the loss of critical infrastructure necessary to many peoples daily
lives (though
Yep verizon does indeed filter all unsolicated inbound traffic to the
EVDO network. It can be a blessing or a curse. :)
Skywing wrote:
Verizon filters unsolicited inbound traffic for their EVDO customers in my
experience.
- S
-Original Message-
From: Roland Dobbins
Sent: Thursday, A
Jared Mauch wrote:
On Apr 9, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Robert M. Enger wrote:
That AT&T has stopped provisioning protection fiber for automatic
restoral is mind boggling.
That our crack (or on crack) govt contracting/emergency-preparedness
staff didn't demand protected facilities for 911 is ano
multiple operators and seriously
disrupted in a given locality.
The only difference here is that in the Heart of Geek Territory. Hence
the Natives are restless ...
Roderick S. Beck
Director of European Sales
Hibernia Atlantic
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wyble [mailto:char...@thewyb
Fouant, Stefan wrote:
Hi folks,
I am trying to compile data on which providers are currently supporting
BGP Flowspec at their edge, if there are any at all. The few providers
I've reached out to have indicated they do not support this and have no
intention of supporting this any time in the n
Wouldn't some authentication system be more useful than trying to lock
all the manholes? Picture a system maybe using RFID or some other radio
system where you walk up to manhole, wave your 'wand' (like a Mobil
Speedpass), you hear a couple beeps, and you're cleared to open the
manhole. Without a
I sense a thread moderation occurring here shortly.
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:39:23 EDT, Izaac said:
Do you realize that you're putting trust in the sane action of parties
who conclude their reasoning process with destruction and murder?
And how is that different
Crooks, Sam wrote:
I'm considering use of AT&T / Verizon / Sprint WWAN services and the
Cisco 3G router interface cards/integrated module in C880 routers for
primary or backup WAN network connectivity for routers.
I haven't used the integrated cards with cisco gear. However I do have
300+ c
Can't get to level3.net 63.211.236.36 or www.level3.net 4.68.95.28 from
Pittsburgh either and I peer directly with level3 with a full BGP feed.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 3:35 PM, J. Oquendo wrote:
>
> Anyone else experience sporadic funkiness via
> Level3? I can't even reach the main website fro
What is it about the bloody telcos. You want to spend money, but yet you
can't reach the right people to get your questions answered or schedule
the service.
Gah.
I experienced this recently, trying to have some inside wiring work done
at my house. They rolled a tech, but then he claimed he "
Quite a bit of overhead. Good article here:
http://blog.ioshints.info/2009/03/adsl-overhead.html
Curtis Maurand wrote:
I don't understand why DSL providers don't just administratively down
the port the customer is hooked to rather than using PPPoE which costs
bandwidth and has huge manageme
don't expect that service to be comparable in price to the residential
users.
charles
data center. Rather than
>> ask for another assignment, I would like to advertise one /22 from one
>> location and the other /22 from the second location both with the same
>> asn. My apps will work that way, so I don't have an issue internally,
>> but I'm looking
Sorry, typo'd the /21. He wants to carve into /22.
On 5/22/08 11:45 AM, "Joe Maimon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Yamasaki, Charles wrote:
>>> Make sure that your two location is inter-connected directly,
>>
>> Why is this required?
backplane bandwidth.
This might be of interest:
http://nrg.cs.ucl.ac.uk/mjh/tmp/vrouter-perf.pdf
--
Charles Wyble (818) 280 - 7059
http://charlesnw.blogspot.com
CTO Known Element Enterprises / SoCal WiFI project
rom Xorp to Quagga, and a supposition that should
improve it.
--
Charles Wyble (818) 280 - 7059
http://charlesnw.blogspot.com
CTO Known Element Enterprises / SoCal WiFI project
that performs. I'm guessing it would be quite nice.
--
Charles Wyble (818) 280 - 7059
http://charlesnw.blogspot.com
CTO Known Element Enterprises / SoCal WiFI project
that?
I mean unless of course your a US telco. :)
--
Charles Wyble (818) 280 - 7059
http://charlesnw.blogspot.com
CTO Known Element Enterprises / SoCal WiFI project
called the
customer service group who were kind, but clueless about the question,
forget the answer.
If anybody from Sprint is reading this and can aid in getting
'show ip bgp X.X.X.X' re-enabled on the Looking Glass, I would be most
grateful.
charles
TCP would work, but it makes it more difficult to do Anycast, which
works well with UDP and DNS.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Chris Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 5:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: maybe a dumb idea on how to fix the dns problems i
fully done. Oh the Web Application Firewall stuff was good too.
--
Charles Wyble (818) 280 - 7059
http://charlesnw.blogspot.com
CTO Known Element Enterprises / SoCal WiFI project
ve ya an earful :)
--
Charles Wyble (818) 280 - 7059
http://charlesnw.blogspot.com
CTO Known Element Enterprises / SoCal WiFI project
l2ping works on bluetooth devices on Linux. Might work for other stuff
as well. Not sure what Cisco offers in this regard.
--
Charles Wyble (818) 280 - 7059
http://charlesnw.blogspot.com
CTO Known Element Enterprises / SoCal WiFI project
ave yet to play with the Mac Ipv6 support (typing this on a
Mac now I should try in my lab later). What auto configuration
mechanisms are you referring to? Bonjour? Isn't there an RFC or two for
Zeroconf?
--
Charles Wyble (818) 280 - 7059
http://charlesnw.blogspot.com
CTO Known Element
Sean Siler wrote:
Nope. XP does not support DHCPv6 - only Vista/Windows Server 2008 (and later)
can do that.
Sean
http://internecine.eu/systems/windows_xp-ipv6.html and
http://internecine.eu/software/dibbler_dhcpv6.html discuss how to deploy
dhcpv6 on xp. It's 3rd party but doable.
I'd like to talk to someone about a problem with some prefixes no longer
working through your network. Please contact off list (email best)
ThanksChuck
Charles L. Mills
Senior Network Engineer
Access Data Corporation / Pittsburgh, PA 15238
Cmills at accessdc dot com
This e
lly
routable addresses (for a VoIP/IPTV roll out later) So I'm not exactly a
traditional ISP or colocation customer, but share characteristics with
them. Does this matter? Should I just submit my request and see what
happens?
--
Charles Wyble (818) 280 - 7059
http://charlesnw.blogspot.com
s a policy of
deny SMTP relaying by default,
provide clear instructions to allow outbound relay via approved server
farm
if you don't want to be blocked request unblocking via a self service
web form.
Seems perfectly acceptable to me.
Thoughts?
--
Charles Wyble (818) 280 - 7059
http://cha
Michael Thomas wrote:
Charles Wyble wrote:
I have SBC / AT&T / Yahoo DSL in Southern California and they block
outbound 25 to anything but Yahoo SMTP server farm, and they only
allow SSL
connectivity at that. I'm all for that personally.
That seems to be the convention wisdom
Agree on #2 as well. You can bet they're also reading Nanog right now
to see who and how it was detected. Oh, well, on with the fight.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Christian Koch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 12:58 AM
To: Justin Shore; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Los
Angeles, CA area? Looking for a rack and some rackmount power strips if
possible.
Contact me off list.
Thanks Much,
Israel
--
Charles Wyble (818) 280 - 7059
http://charlesnw.blogspot.com
CTO Known Element Enterprises / SoCal WiFI project
View -> Organize by thread.
Then just hit the little circle, which selects all messages. Then
delete.
On Nov 18, 2009, at 11:13 AM, Matthew Dodd wrote:
I think he meant being able to easily delete an entire thread of
emails, like you might be able to if you were using Gmail. Sadly I
don
H..
This is most interesting. Have you spoken with Adobe about the issue? I don't
have an immediate handle on how they have reacted to security issues in the
past.
Sane defaults would be nice. :(
You might want to ping Akami as they have substantial operational experience
with flash medi
On Dec 3, 2009, at 9:53 AM, Matthew Huff wrote:
> The source address appears to be fixed as well as the source port (),
> scanning different destinations and ports.
>
>
Some script kiddies found nmap and decided to target you for some reason. It
happens. It's annoying.
8.8.8.8 6.6.6.6 would have been really really funny. :)
On Dec 3, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>> now Google DNS, anything more?
>
> GoogleNation.
>
> Cheers
> Jorge
>
LOL.
One place I worked at hosted a bunch of websites and called them by business
unit. so xxx_nnn
One business unit was particularly problematic and frequently returned 500
errors. The version in production was xxx_4xx when the next major rev came
out we skipped 5xx and went to 6xx. :)
That is an Akami error.
On Dec 3, 2009, at 6:57 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
> talking about evil http://www.bing.com/ :
>
>> Oops
>> This isn't the page you wanted!
>>
>> Try this
>> Refresh the page. If you get this message again, please check back later.
>>
>> Ref A: 7d09ba2186d4448a8dd2b99ad2
Does anyone have a list of carriers who are IPv6 capable today?
I would assume this would be rolled out in larger cities first but
anything outside of "testbed environments" and "trials" as in
Comcast's recent announcement seems to be all that is available.
I'm being tasked with coming up with an
That could be a lot of things. Without a network drawing and access
to the devices to dig further it is difficult to say.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Dennis Dayman
wrote:
> have a friend who has 21 floors of a building in DFW, multiple switches, etc
> and they started to have latency is
; the Internets.
>>
>> I declined.
>> --
>> Democracy: Three wolves and a sheep voting on the dinner menu.
>> (A republic, using parliamentary law, protects the minority.)
>>
>> Requiescas in pace o email
>> Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
>> Eppure si rinfresca
>>
>> ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
>> http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
--
=
Charles L. Mills
Westmoreland Co. ARES EC
Amateur Radio Callsign W3YNI
Email: w3y...@gmail.com
team is questioning whether that means it really
is non-negotiable. They're not exactly fans of it as it is written.
(I probably can't share what my legal counsel is saying to me about the
agreement, but it's probably not relevant to the question anyway...)
===
Jeremy Charles
Thanks to those who replied to offer experience and input on working with ARIN.
You've given me some helpful information to pass along to our legal team when
considering the RSA.
Cheers!
-JC
We are not allowed to post from work email accounts to lists such as
these as well.
The CISO's reasoning (and he may have a point...) is that we might ask
the list "Hey...I can't figure out why my Cisco $MODEL router is doing
"this" when I upgrade to $VERSION of IOS."
Then someone trolling to hac
-1
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Richard Barnes
wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:00 AM, jim deleskie wrote:
>> I'm betting more then a few of use free mail accts to keep this
>> separate from our work mail. If your really having that much issue,
>> config your mail server to
201 - 300 of 454 matches
Mail list logo
