On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 8:35 PM Deepak Jain wrote:
> Now I know I'm pushing my luck... but do certain vendors more fully
> embrace sFlow than others? maybe one of the whitebox vendors if not one
> of the majors?
>
> Hacking support into something isn't the worse thing in the world, but
> if there
Need some help tracking down a device.
Thank you,
Joe
The Special Counsel's report is expected to be posted on its website
sometime between 11 a.m. and noon on Thursday, April 18, 2019.
https://www.justice.gov/sco
Since I helped with website for the Starr Report on September 11, 1998, I
wish all website admins and network admins well tommorrow mo
On Apr 17, 2019, at 9:02 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
>
> The Special Counsel's report is expected to be posted on its website sometime
> between 11 a.m. and noon on Thursday, April 18, 2019.
>
> https://www.justice.gov/sco
>
> Since I helped with website for the Starr Report on September 11, 1998,
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Things will probably be easier this time. The Internet has evolved ways
of dealing with exactly this problem. (Avi used to call it “slash-dot
insurance”, but the idea is the same.) Specifically:
Yep, it will be interesting to see where the chokepo
And we may still see the web stack being the ultimate cause of the delay.
Parkinson's law always comes to the rescue:-)
More faster and efficient processing architecture, Hyper transport buses,
amd-64 Branch prediction.
Massively faster storage subsystems and disk arrays, SSD slab caching for
h
of course p2p is the way to distribute this but i doubt the justice department
can admit there is any positive legitimate use for p2p.
(i’ve been surprised that it hasn’t made it to wikileaks or bittorrent yet.
“russiar, are you listening?”)
(i sure hope there’s a signed version or at least a
Isn’t this why god invented CDNs? Though, i doubt the govment is Akamized...
-Mike
> On Apr 17, 2019, at 20:26, Mark Seiden wrote:
>
> of course p2p is the way to distribute this but i doubt the justice
> department can admit there is any positive legitimate use for p2p.
>
> (i’ve been surpri
Check the nANOG archives for examples of whitehouse.gov, cia.gov etc. It
certainly is.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 23:34 wrote:
> Isn’t this why god invented CDNs? Though, i doubt the govment is
> Akamized...
>
> -Mike
>
> On Apr 17, 2019, at 20:26, Mark Seiden wrote:
>
> of course p2p is the way
Or maybe do this (faster than nanog archives) :)
bash-3.2# dig cia.gov ns
; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> cia.gov ns
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 33203
;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECT
Oh spiffy!
Will be interesting to see if there are any problems then.
-Mike
> On Apr 17, 2019, at 21:14, Brett Watson wrote:
>
> Or maybe do this (faster than nanog archives) :)
>
>
> bash-3.2# dig cia.gov ns
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> cia.gov ns
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; Got answer:
Hey Mike.
Agreed. But the scale of a 400 page document with global interest? Should
be highly cached with a good ratio of served to pull bits. I'm willing to
bet you a beer its just another day on the Internet. However, I could be
wrong. Hope to see you in DC to collect! I already know Brett is in
Deal.
Though, like you, i am assuming it’ll just be another day on the intarwebs as
well...
We shall see!
-Mike
> On Apr 17, 2019, at 21:25, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
> Hey Mike.
>
> Agreed. But the scale of a 400 page document with global interest? Should
> be highly cached with a good ra
13 matches
Mail list logo
