Oh spiffy! Will be interesting to see if there are any problems then.
-Mike > On Apr 17, 2019, at 21:14, Brett Watson <br...@the-watsons.org> wrote: > > Or maybe do this (faster than nanog archives) :) > > > bash-3.2# dig cia.gov ns > > ; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> cia.gov ns > ;; global options: +cmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 33203 > ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 > > ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: > ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;cia.gov. IN NS > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a22-66.akam.net. > cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a16-67.akam.net. > cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a1-22.akam.net. > cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a12-65.akam.net. > cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a3-64.akam.net. > cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a13-65.akam.net. > > > >> On Apr 17, 2019, at 9:11 PM, Martin Hannigan <hanni...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> Check the nANOG archives for examples of whitehouse.gov, cia.gov etc. It >> certainly is. >> >> >> >>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 23:34 <mike.l...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Isn’t this why god invented CDNs? Though, i doubt the govment is Akamized... >>> >>> -Mike >>> >>>> On Apr 17, 2019, at 20:26, Mark Seiden <m...@seiden.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> of course p2p is the way to distribute this but i doubt the justice >>>> department can admit there is any positive legitimate use for p2p. >>>> >>>> (i’ve been surprised that it hasn’t made it to wikileaks or bittorrent >>>> yet. “russiar, are you listening?”) >>>> >>>> (i sure hope there’s a signed version or at least a hash.) >>>> >>>> i predict there will be versions with fake content, missing content, and >>>> malware inserted that are distributed as well. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> and i’ll bet there will be some infected pdf version as well distributed >>>> that way. >>>>> On Apr 17, 2019, 7:57 PM -0700, fwessling--- via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>, >>>>> wrote: >>>>> And we may still see the web stack being the ultimate cause of the delay. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Parkinson's law always comes to the rescue:-) >>>>> More faster and efficient processing architecture, Hyper transport buses, >>>>> amd-64 Branch prediction. >>>>> Massively faster storage subsystems and disk arrays, SSD slab caching for >>>>> hypervisors >>>>> >>>>> And some dude with a AJAX framework to serve a PDF bringging the whole >>>>> thing to a a screeching halt >>>>> >>>>>> On April 17, 2019 10:35:29 PM EDT, Sean Donelan <s...@donelan.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, 17 Apr 2019, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: >>>>>>> Things will probably be easier this time. The Internet has evolved >>>>>> ways >>>>>>> of dealing with exactly this problem. (Avi used to call it “slash-dot >>>>>> >>>>>>> insurance”, but the idea is the same.) Specifically: >>>>>> >>>>>> Yep, it will be interesting to see where the chokepoints are tommorrow. >>>>>> >>>>>> In 1998, the bandwidth pipes never filled up. The chokepoint was in the >>>>>> >>>>>> TCP and Web stacks. Eventually the Associated Press got a copy of the >>>>>> Starr Report on a CD from a congressional staffer. The press intern >>>>>> running down the street holding a CD was faster than 1998 internet :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> We were also lucky in 1998, no one had thought of DDOS yet. >>>>> >>>>> Frederick Wessling (CIO) >>>>> Succinct Systems LLC >>>>> Cell: +1(561) 571-2799 >>>>> Office: +1(904) 758-9915 ext. 9925 >>>>> Fax: +1(904) 758-9987 >>>>> www.SuccinctSystems.com >
