Or maybe do this (faster than nanog archives) :)
bash-3.2# dig cia.gov ns ; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> cia.gov ns ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 33203 ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;cia.gov. IN NS ;; ANSWER SECTION: cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a22-66.akam.net. cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a16-67.akam.net. cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a1-22.akam.net. cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a12-65.akam.net. cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a3-64.akam.net. cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a13-65.akam.net. > On Apr 17, 2019, at 9:11 PM, Martin Hannigan <hanni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Check the nANOG archives for examples of whitehouse.gov > <http://whitehouse.gov/>, cia.gov <http://cia.gov/> etc. It certainly is. > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 23:34 <mike.l...@gmail.com > <mailto:mike.l...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Isn’t this why god invented CDNs? Though, i doubt the govment is Akamized... > > -Mike > > On Apr 17, 2019, at 20:26, Mark Seiden <m...@seiden.com > <mailto:m...@seiden.com>> wrote: > >> of course p2p is the way to distribute this but i doubt the justice >> department can admit there is any positive legitimate use for p2p. >> >> (i’ve been surprised that it hasn’t made it to wikileaks or bittorrent yet. >> “russiar, are you listening?”) >> >> (i sure hope there’s a signed version or at least a hash.) >> >> i predict there will be versions with fake content, missing content, and >> malware inserted that are distributed as well. >> >> >> >> >> and i’ll bet there will be some infected pdf version as well distributed >> that way. >> On Apr 17, 2019, 7:57 PM -0700, fwessling--- via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org >> <mailto:nanog@nanog.org>>, wrote: >>> And we may still see the web stack being the ultimate cause of the delay. >>> >>> >>> Parkinson's law always comes to the rescue:-) >>> More faster and efficient processing architecture, Hyper transport buses, >>> amd-64 Branch prediction. >>> Massively faster storage subsystems and disk arrays, SSD slab caching for >>> hypervisors >>> >>> And some dude with a AJAX framework to serve a PDF bringging the whole >>> thing to a a screeching halt >>> >>> On April 17, 2019 10:35:29 PM EDT, Sean Donelan <s...@donelan.com >>> <mailto:s...@donelan.com>> wrote: >>>> On Wed, 17 Apr 2019, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: >>>>> Things will probably be easier this time. The Internet has evolved >>>> ways >>>>> of dealing with exactly this problem. (Avi used to call it “slash-dot >>>> >>>>> insurance”, but the idea is the same.) Specifically: >>>> >>>> Yep, it will be interesting to see where the chokepoints are tommorrow. >>>> >>>> In 1998, the bandwidth pipes never filled up. The chokepoint was in the >>>> >>>> TCP and Web stacks. Eventually the Associated Press got a copy of the >>>> Starr Report on a CD from a congressional staffer. The press intern >>>> running down the street holding a CD was faster than 1998 internet :-) >>>> >>>> We were also lucky in 1998, no one had thought of DDOS yet. >>> >>> Frederick Wessling (CIO) >>> Succinct Systems LLC >>> Cell: +1(561) 571-2799 >>> Office: +1(904) 758-9915 ext. 9925 >>> Fax: +1(904) 758-9987 >>> www.SuccinctSystems.com <http://www.succinctsystems.com/>
