Hey Mike. Agreed. But the scale of a 400 page document with global interest? Should be highly cached with a good ratio of served to pull bits. I'm willing to bet you a beer its just another day on the Internet. However, I could be wrong. Hope to see you in DC to collect! I already know Brett is in. :)
Best, -M< On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:21 AM <mike.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh spiffy! > > Will be interesting to see if there are any problems then. > > -Mike > > On Apr 17, 2019, at 21:14, Brett Watson <br...@the-watsons.org> wrote: > > Or maybe do this (faster than nanog archives) :) > > > bash-3.2# dig cia.gov ns > > ; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> cia.gov ns > ;; global options: +cmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 33203 > ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 > > ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: > ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;cia.gov. IN NS > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a22-66.akam.net. > cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a16-67.akam.net. > cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a1-22.akam.net. > cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a12-65.akam.net. > cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a3-64.akam.net. > cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a13-65.akam.net. > > > > On Apr 17, 2019, at 9:11 PM, Martin Hannigan <hanni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Check the nANOG archives for examples of whitehouse.gov, cia.gov etc. It > certainly is. > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 23:34 <mike.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Isn’t this why god invented CDNs? Though, i doubt the govment is >> Akamized... >> >> -Mike >> >> On Apr 17, 2019, at 20:26, Mark Seiden <m...@seiden.com> wrote: >> >> of course p2p is the way to distribute this but i doubt the justice >> department can admit there is any positive legitimate use for p2p. >> >> (i’ve been surprised that it hasn’t made it to wikileaks or bittorrent >> yet. “russiar, are you listening?”) >> >> (i sure hope there’s a signed version or at least a hash.) >> >> i predict there will be versions with fake content, missing content, and >> malware inserted that are distributed as well. >> >> >> >> >> and i’ll bet there will be some infected pdf version as well distributed >> that way. >> On Apr 17, 2019, 7:57 PM -0700, fwessling--- via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>, >> wrote: >> >> And we may still see the web stack being the ultimate cause of the delay. >> >> >> Parkinson's law always comes to the rescue:-) >> More faster and efficient processing architecture, Hyper transport buses, >> amd-64 Branch prediction. >> Massively faster storage subsystems and disk arrays, SSD slab caching for >> hypervisors >> >> And some dude with a AJAX framework to serve a PDF bringging the whole >> thing to a a screeching halt >> >> On April 17, 2019 10:35:29 PM EDT, Sean Donelan <s...@donelan.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 17 Apr 2019, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: >> >> Things will probably be easier this time. The Internet has evolved >> >> ways >> >> of dealing with exactly this problem. (Avi used to call it “slash-dot >> >> >> insurance”, but the idea is the same.) Specifically: >> >> >> Yep, it will be interesting to see where the chokepoints are tommorrow. >> >> In 1998, the bandwidth pipes never filled up. The chokepoint was in the >> >> TCP and Web stacks. Eventually the Associated Press got a copy of the >> Starr Report on a CD from a congressional staffer. The press intern >> running down the street holding a CD was faster than 1998 internet :-) >> >> We were also lucky in 1998, no one had thought of DDOS yet. >> >> >> Frederick Wessling (CIO) >> Succinct Systems LLC >> Cell: +1(561) 571-2799 >> Office: +1(904) 758-9915 ext. 9925 >> Fax: +1(904) 758-9987 >> www.SuccinctSystems.com <http://www.succinctsystems.com/> >> >> >
