On 07/28/2015 08:06 PM, Bryan Tong wrote:
Hello All,
SpamHaus has done us the favor of blacklisting all of our prefixes due to
the issues with handful of IPs from customers we have removed from our
network.
They are now being unresponsive on helping us get these listings removed
and we have a l
On Jul 28, 2015, at 8:54 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>
> Is anyone seeing packet loss or routing issues on the Level3 network on the
> east coast right now?
>
>
We’ve seen a slew of problems going west out of Level3 in NYC the last couple
of nights. Last night was particularly bad to the point w
I see that everyone can download Windows 10 this morning!
There goes my bandwidth.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/software-download/windows10
Curtis
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Justin Mckillican
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 3:49 PM
To: n.
It's downloading for me right now, though I did reserve my slot.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Justin Mckillican wrote:
> For upgra
On 7/29/2015 06:58, STARNES, CURTIS wrote:
I see that everyone can download Windows 10 this morning!
There goes my bandwidth.
One of us does not understand how "they" said it was going to be done.
--
sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)
4.0gb in 10mins using home fttc is not bad :)
Colin
> On 29 Jul 2015, at 13:20, Scott Helms wrote:
>
> It's downloading for me right now, though I did reserve my slot.
>
>
> Scott Helms
> Vice President of Technology
> ZCorum
> (678) 507-5000
>
> http://twitte
On 7/29/2015 06:58, STARNES, CURTIS wrote:
I see that everyone can download Windows 10 this morning!
There goes my bandwidth.
Just checked this PC--apparently I already have it and am "good to go".
I was expecting an email or something.
--
sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)
On 7/29/2015 07:20, Scott Helms wrote:
It's downloading for me right now, though I did reserve my slot.
When I checked a few minutes ago it said my PC had passed the tests--now
it says it is downloading.
Speed and responsiveness "feels" normal.
--
sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juven
On 7/29/2015 07:32, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 7/29/2015 07:20, Scott Helms wrote:
It's downloading for me right now, though I did reserve my slot.
When I checked a few minutes ago it said my PC had passed the tests--now
it says it is downloading.
Speed and responsiveness "feels" normal.
Scre
We are servicing more MDU customers that have older buildings. There is no
CAT5E installed, so extremely old phone cable or coaxial TV cable seems to
be our only inside wire options. There is no easy and inexpensive way to
run new cable, so we must deal with what is available.
We are very familiar
Colton,
Pico is a decent solution, Harmonic has one too (
http://www.harmonicinc.com/product/cable-edge/nsg-exo). As for cable
specific lists, about the closest I know about is the SCTE mailing list.
http://www.scte.org/SCTE/Resources/SCTE_Lists.aspx
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZC
El 7/28/2015 a las 4:15 PM, Nick Olsen escribió:
> Anyone anxious to see what kind of traffic comes from Windows 10 releasing
> tomorrow?
>
> Being a 3-4GB download. Each device is moving more data than any Apple
> update ever did.
Wow, to download 3-4 GB in a developing country (like mine -
Colton,
While we have never tried it ourselves, an option we've looked at in similar
situations are these:
http://www.ready-links.com/ipc1840c.html
http://www.bectechnologies.net/main/EoCoax2310.shtml (up to 31 endpoints)
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.
Seriously nice solutions...both of them.
--Curtis
On 7/29/2015 10:49 AM, frnk...@iname.com wrote:
Colton,
While we have never tried it ourselves, an option we've looked at in similar
situations are these:
http://www.ready-links.com/ipc1840c.html
http://www.bectechnologies.net/main/EoCoax2310.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Bryan Tong wrote:
> I wouldnt have such a disheartened attitude if they would have been
> specific or given time to comply.
>
> eSited LLC
> (701) 390-9638
Hi Brian,
eSited has 37 unresolved spam listings with Spamhaus, all documented
and some going as far back
hi
On 07/29/15 at 10:59am, Curtis Maurand wrote:
> Seriously nice solutions...both of them.
..
> >-Original Message-
> >From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Colton Conor
> >Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 8:27 AM
> >To: NANOG ; Scott Helms
> >Subject: DOCSIS CMTS Sy
If the customer has headroom on a 10G link, what's the harm with running a 1G
volumetric DDoS across the Internet? Or if it's application layer, anytime
against prescribed lab devices?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Brett Watson
Sent:
Some concern expressed here:
http://blog.streamingmedia.com/2015/07/windows-10-launch-huge-traffic.html
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Nick Olsen
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 3:45 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Windows 10 Release
Anyon
So the BEC solution I would assume is just standard MOCA or HPNA based as
it is max 200Mbps, but the Ready-Links solution claims 1Gbps. Has anyone
used the Ready-Links solution? Seem to good to be true.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Curtis Maurand wrote:
> Seriously nice solutions...both of t
'QoS problems are to be expected' . Uh?
Don't you put QoS into place just to ensure that the minimum bandwidth you need
to ensure critical services (such that your voice traffic is not impeded for
example) are NOT affected across your WAN links when there are big globs of
data banging around?
S
Would be nice to have an RBL service that attended NANOG meetings.
Would make for a more trusted RBL we can tell customers to make use.
Spamhaus ever attend a NANOG meetings ?
Thank You
Bob Evans
CTO
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:41:08PM -0600, Bryan Tong wrote:
>> Yes that is part of it.
>>
>>
They come to M3AAWG on a regular basis and there’s the M3AAWG hosting SIG that
you might want to participate in.
NANOG doesn’t always have a mail abuse (and not very many network abuse)
session on the agenda, plus just how many people doing routing or DNS seem to
even care what their colleagu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I agree with Suresh here -- NANOG used to almost be somewhat hostile
to anyone who started discussions regarding anti-abuse and/or security
issues which didn't involve routing backbone engineers.
A lot of us old-timers took the hint and basically
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I agree with Suresh here -- NANOG used to almost be somewhat hostile
to anyone who started discussions regarding anti-abuse and/or security
issues which didn't involve routing backbone engineers.
A lot of us old-timers took the hint and basically
I see that point - however, spamhaus has become a haus-hold word these
days and everyone runs into these issuesits not malware or bots we
block from a network level blackhole. Yet it is basic network operations
these days to have to deal with someone complaining about their hacked
mail server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
You can download an ISO and burn it to install... Guessing if your
upgrading multiple machines, that would be the way to go...
- --Tiernan
On 29/07/2015 15:13, Alejandro Acosta wrote:
> El 7/28/2015 a las 4:15 PM, Nick Olsen escribió:
>> Anyone anx
Since 7:30AM CDT Friday morning, we've seen strange problems across L3
where around 1-2% of traffic flows are dying. It is interesting behavior in
that new flows from the same source to the same destination work, however,
in the cases where the traffic is stopped we never receive the SYN-ACK nor
an
Edit: It is interesting behavior in that new flows from the same source to
the same destination work are successful...
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:27 PM, James Baldwin
wrote:
> Since 7:30AM CDT Friday morning, we've seen strange problems across L3
> where around 1-2% of traffic flows are dying. It
We're actually seeing some problems coming from the Boston area, going
to Cisco WebEx. We keep ending up going to Level 3 NY and dying,
intermittently. Unfortunately, both of our peers, Level3 and XO, end up
going to the same place from Boston. If I go to WebEx from a device in
Florida, we end u
Er - a couple of ways
1. If you run a farm of mail servers, something like splunk for your logs is
kind of necessary. How difficult is it going to be to trigger a splunk alert
on whatever looks like an administrative block? Either by a large provider, or
by a DNS block list.
2. You can rsync
hi roland
On 07/29/15 at 05:47am, Roland Dobbins wrote:
>
> On 29 Jul 2015, at 5:19, alvin nanog wrote:
>
> >as previously noted by others, legit corp will ask you for lots of
> >legal paperwork for their "get out of jail card" for DDoS'ing your
> >servers
> >and all the other ISP's routers al
On 30 Jul 2015, at 2:38, alvin nanog wrote:
there is no need to pay people to attack your servers ...
Unless you don't have the expertise to do it yourself. Again, I
advocate an organic defense capability and an organic testing
capability, but there are many organizations which unfortunatel
NANOGers -
To the extent that you are interested in ARIN's Registration Services
Agreement, we have
just initiated a consultation on a proposed new version of the RSA (and
LRSA) as noted in
the attached announcement. If you wish to provide any feedback, please
do so on the
On 7/29/2015 10:30, frnk...@iname.com wrote:
Some concern expressed here:
http://blog.streamingmedia.com/2015/07/windows-10-launch-huge-traffic.html
I have no status above "out-of-work old fart", and it has been a while
since I was engaged in anything bigger than my four-PC, three-wiffy, one
http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2015-July/026136.html
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015, Bob Evans wrote:
Would be nice to have an RBL service that attended NANOG meetings.
Would make for a more trusted RBL we can tell customers to make use.
How do you know they don't? Most of them keep a low profile due to things
like
http://www.bizjournals.com/southflori
> http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2015-July/026136.html
Which appears to be about 25% crap, 30% FUD, and the remainder consists
of concerns of varying levels of validity.
For privacy-minded individuals who are not interested in sharing lots
of stuff with Microsoft, there are instal
>> http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2015-July/026136.html
>
> Which appears to be about 25% crap, 30% FUD, and the remainder consists
> of concerns of varying levels of validity.
really? read the legal fine print
https://edri.org/microsofts-new-small-print-how-your-personal-data-a
Hoping to speak with CableOne (AS11492) regarding routing towards Gaikai
(AS33353) in the Mississippi region. Please contact me offline.
Thanks,
Chris Costa
Gaikai
cco...@gaikai.com
> You can download an ISO and burn it to install... Guessing if your
> upgrading multiple machines, that would be the way to go...
You don't even need to burn it to install. Just mount the ISO and
run setup.exe
... JG
--
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015, Bob Evans wrote:
I see that point - however, spamhaus has become a haus-hold word these
days and everyone runs into these issuesits not malware or bots we
block from a network level blackhole. Yet it is basic network operations
these days to have to deal with someone com
> >> http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2015-July/026136.html
> >
> > Which appears to be about 25% crap, 30% FUD, and the remainder consists
> > of concerns of varying levels of validity.
>
> really? read the legal fine print
>
> https://edri.org/microsofts-new-small-print-how-your
42 matches
Mail list logo
