On Thursday, July 24, 2014 02:27:01 AM Jimmy Hess wrote:
> It would be interesting if Google, Wikimedia, CBS/ABC,
> CNN, Walmart, Espn, Salesforce, BoFa, Weather.com,
> Dropbox, Paypal, Netflix, Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter,
> Amazon, Yahoo, Ebay, Wordpress.com, Pinterest,
> Instagram, Tumblr, Red
On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 04:21:32 AM Corey Touchet wrote:
> Right now my thinking are MX480 or ASR9k platforms.
> Opinions on those are equally welcome as alternatives,
> but I’d love to hear from those with personal
> experiences today vs sales people trying to tell me it
> would route the worl
❦ 30 juillet 2014 09:53 +0200, Mark Tinka :
> IOS XR on the CRS and ASR9000 is based on QNX, which suffers
> from being only a 32-bit kernel. So even if the hardware
> will ship with >4GB of RAM, the OS will only see 4GB (I have
> 12GB in my CRS's and 8GB on my ASR9001's).
What's the point
On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 11:12:44 AM Vincent Bernat
wrote:
> What's the point of shipping more memory then? Maybe the
> OS can only address 4GB per process but is able to use
> up to 64GB in total (PAE)?
That was one argument from Cisco - that when the software
catches up, they might be able
> From: Mark Tinka
> Commercial trends have been moving farther and farther away
> from, "How much bandwidth do you want to buy?" to, "How many
> Tv channels, voice minutes and cloud recording can I get?",
> particularly in much more developed markets
Internet should be utility, many providing
Brandon Butterworth wrote:
Yes, I like to remind those engaging in peering wars and charging for
access users to be careful when creating reasons for others to become
their competition
As a broadcaster we send our content direct to users over the air,
there is opportunity in not making us do s
On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 12:50:17 PM Brandon Butterworth
wrote:
> Internet should be utility, many providing it don't wnat
> to be a utility and so try doing other services usually
> best left to specialists
When we did FTTH at $previous_employer, it really was the
first time an operator (al
Hello Nanog,
I'm fairly new to running my employers multihomed BGP network with our own
ASN.
Things have been relatively smooth and stable for the past few months.
We have 2 upstream ISP's giving us full routes.
We have a single link to each provider, but I run two BGP sessions over
that single l
We also have a Solid Optics CWDM meter and it does the job quite nicely. It
feels solid (haha...) and is relatively cheap.
--
Jeff Walter
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Neil Davidson wrote:
> We have the Solid Optics DWDM and CWDM power meters. Simple, inexpensive
> and works well ...
> http
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Simon Lockhart wrote:
> On Tue Jul 29, 2014 at 02:21:32AM +, Corey Touchet wrote:
>> Right now my thinking are MX480 or ASR9k platforms. Opinions on those are
> Or, protect your existing investment in 6500 and replace the SUP720 with the
> SUP2T. You can then
This sounds perfectly acceptable.
Your ISP-B should have a published list of communities that do
different things. You need to choose the specific community to get the
behaviour you are after. For example you can see a list of what Level3
accept from customers about half way down here:
http://ones
On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 03:06:55 PM Jimmy Hess wrote:
> I would generally suggest you look at it as a long term
> decision, at least before jumping to the next
> incremental (modest increase) on the upgrade treadmill.
> It depends on whether the 6500 is still a perfect match
> for your networ
On (2014-07-30 08:06 -0500), Jimmy Hess wrote:
> Keep in mind most of the MX series makes the 6500 look like a 5 port
> linksys home router, when it comes to carrying around and managing
> large BGP tables; both in terms of prefix capacity, speed, the
> policy/filtering/configuration managemen
On 27-07-14 16:15, Livingood, Jason wrote:
FYI. The U.S. Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau released a Public
Notice on Friday (copied below), seeking comment on the “implementation and
effectiveness of the CSRIC III recommendations”.
Comments are due by September 26. Some folks here
Should.
It is a few million$ in man hours thou.
( Not necessary spent, but budgeted )
And still no BCP38 recommendation.
I wonder:
1. If they taught of it;
2. What was their process to not include it;
Oh well.
-
Alain Hebert
NANOGers -
Anyone can become a member of the ARIN Board or ARIN AC - if you
are interested, please have an ARIN Member nominate you today for
the upcoming ARIN Elections.
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
Begin forwarded message:
From: ARIN mailto:i...@arin.net>>
The only actual residential data I can offer is my own. I am fully dual stack
and about 40% of my traffic is IPv6. I am a netflix subscriber, but also an
amazon prime member.
I will say that if amazon would get off the dime and support IPv6, it would
make a significant difference.
Other than
There¹s still a lot of websites that are not with the times.
No ipv6 on CNN, FOX, or NBC news websites.
Slashdot.org shame on you!
Comcast and AT&T work, but not Verizon. No surprise there. Power company
nope.
I think CGN is fine for 99% of customers out there. Until the iPhone came
out Ve
Once upon a time, Corey Touchet
said:
> Comcast is pushing over 1TBPS of IPv6 traffic, but I¹m sure that¹s mainly
> video from Youtube and Netflix.
One thing to remember about the video services that do support IPv6 is
that a lot of end users, even if they have IPv6 in the home, won't see
them o
> There really is very little reason why certain major content
> owners and providers who operate their own IP networks
> cannot turn around and become full-blown wholesale ISP's
> (and in some cases, consumer ISP's).
>
> As a transit provider industry, we need to get our act
> together and pl
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Amazon apparently recently hired Yurie Rich Spence> to work on their issues.
>
And Yurie recently posted an opening for an IPv6 Engineer at same ... for
any so inclined.
/TJ
On 07/30/2014 09:16 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Corey Touchet
said:
Comcast is pushing over 1TBPS of IPv6 traffic, but I¹m sure that¹s mainly
video from Youtube and Netflix.
One thing to remember about the video services that do support IPv6 is
that a lot of end users, even if t
On Jul 30, 2014, at 8:45 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I will say that if amazon would get off the dime and support IPv6, it would
> make a significant difference.
Per Microsoft public statements, they are now moving address space allocated
them in Brazil to the US to fill a major service shortfa
On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 06:21:46 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
> Yes and no…
>
> The barrier to Netflix becoming a consumer ISP is very
> high… Very very high. It costs a lot of money to deploy
> all that last mile infrastructure, assuming you can get
> permits, acquire rights-of-way, etc. to even do
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message
> , Gary
> Buhrmaster writes:
>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> >
>> > On Jul 29, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>> .
>> >> Add to that over half your traffic will switch to IPv6 as long as
On Jul 30, 2014, at 8:45 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I will say that if amazon would get off the dime and support IPv6, it would
> make a significant difference.
Someone that works for Amazon once told me that they are primed for it now; the
question is whether their customers tick the box appr
We peer with Netflix directly on an exchange, and transit Level3, Cogent,
HE & TW.
In me experience, when our direct peer is down for whatever reason, Netflix
prefers Hurricane Electric no matter what - if the route is there, it takes
it - then Cogent, then Level3, then TW.
I agree that the Netfl
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 13:04:31 -0600, randal k said:
> I agree that the Netflix team is responsive and easy to work with, and
> again in my experience, their network team is extremely interested in
> making things happen (despite what blogs & hearsay ...)
Well, it *is* in their best interests to ma
You can utilize an ASR 1006 / 1013 with an ESP card for CGN functionality.
Starting in 3.10 code you can utilize Bulk Port Allocation to carve out
small consecutive port bundles for end users as to not mess up SIP
functionsand High Speed Logging to log individual customers ports for law
enforcement
I hesitate to respond to Mr. Bennett. But since he has asserted my opinion
on this matter...
There is no reasonable reading of the early FCC Open Internet proposed
rulemaking that would lead to a ban on paid peering. It takes a number of
logical leaps and a great deal of inference to even get clos
On 07/30/2014 11:41 AM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
Someone that works for Amazon once told me that they are primed for it now
Pun intended? :)
In message <53d96dbd.3070...@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes:
> On 07/30/2014 11:41 AM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
> > Someone that works for Amazon once told me that they are primed for it now
>
> Pun intended? :)
The best thing Amazon could do would be to stop stocking IPv4 only
CPE devices.
An update, apparently writs of attachment were sent for not only .ir, but
also .sy and .kp ccTLDs as well, based on separate cases related to support
for terrorism. ICANN has filed a motion to quash the writs and taken the
position that the domains are not assets.
Press:
http://www.securityweek.co
On Jul 30, 2014, at 9:51 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 06:21:46 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>> Yes and no…
>>
>> The barrier to Netflix becoming a consumer ISP is very
>> high… Very very high. It costs a lot of money to deploy
>> all that last mile infrastructure, assuming yo
Seems germane to recent conversations ...
Netflix has signed a peering agreement with AT&T that will see the video
streaming service pay the ISP for direct connection to its network.
Previously, Netflix signed similar agreements with Comcast and Verizon.
http://techcrunch.com/2014/07/29/netfl
On Jul 30, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
>
> On Jul 30, 2014, at 8:45 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>> I will say that if amazon would get off the dime and support IPv6, it would
>> make a significant difference.
>
> Someone that works for Amazon once told me that they are primed
On Jul 30, 2014, at 1:47 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Symmetrical would be tough to do unless you're doing Active-
> E.
I'm an outlier in my thinking, but I believe the best world would be
where the muni offered L1 fiber, and leased access to it on a
non-discrimatory basis. That would necessitate
- Original Message -
> From: "Doug Barton"
> Seems germane to recent conversations ...
>
> Netflix has signed a peering agreement with AT&T that will see the video
> streaming service pay the ISP for direct connection to its network.
>
> Previously, Netflix signed similar agreements wit
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:39:14 -0700, Owen DeLong said:
> I was talking about Amazon, not AWS. Yes, AWS would help too, but in terms of
> the Alexa list, Amazon would swing the percentage meaningfully. I dont know
> to
> what extent AWS would swing the percentage.
There's probably not much stuff
On Jul 30, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <53d96dbd.3070...@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes:
>> On 07/30/2014 11:41 AM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
>>> Someone that works for Amazon once told me that they are primed for it now
>>
>> Pun intended? :)
>
> The best thing Am
On Jul 30, 2014, at 4:17 PM, Collin Anderson wrote:
> An update, apparently writs of attachment were sent for not only .ir, but
> also .sy and .kp ccTLDs as well, based on separate cases related to support
> for terrorism. ICANN has filed a motion to quash the writs and taken the
> position that
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Wonder how long it is before we recognize the need for an international
> technical court for such matters where the guy on the bench has to be not
> just a lawyer, but a nerd, too.
Can I nominate Judge William Alsup?
I keep thinking (in this "you can not own a name" thing) about the early
occupants of North America who to a man, I believe, argued that fences
were just wrong, because you can't own the land.
--
Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Doug Barton"
>
>> Seems germane to recent conversations ...
>>
>> Netflix has signed a peering agreement with AT&T that will see the video
>> streaming service pay the ISP for direct connection to its ne
On 07/30/2014 05:10 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jul 30, 2014, at 4:17 PM, Collin Anderson wrote:
An update, apparently writs of attachment were sent for not only .ir, but
also .sy and .kp ccTLDs as well, based on separate cases related to support
for terrorism. ICANN has filed a motion to quash
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:05:28PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:39:14 -0700, Owen DeLong said:
>
> > I was talking about Amazon, not AWS. Yes, AWS would help too, but in terms
> > of
> > the Alexa list, Amazon would swing the percentage meaningfully. I dont
> >
- Original Message -
> From: "Jay Ashworth"
> > Previously, Netflix signed similar agreements with Comcast and
> > Verizon.
> >
> > http://techcrunch.com/2014/07/29/netflix-and-att-sign-peering-agreement/
>
> Am I nuts in thinking that *someone* has mispelt "Netflix agrees to
> buy trans
On Thursday, July 31, 2014 01:56:40 AM Leo Bicknell wrote:
> I'm an outlier in my thinking, but I believe the best
> world would be where the muni offered L1 fiber, and
> leased access to it on a non-discrimatory basis. That
> would necessitate an Active-E solution since L1 would
> not have thing
On Thursday, July 31, 2014 01:35:32 AM Owen DeLong wrote:
> In that case, I would argue that the attempts to freeze
> Netflix out in a SlowLane extortion scheme are a move by
> the existing content/ISP conglomerates to do just
> exactly that, no?
For Netflix, I can't say for sure whether it is a
49 matches
Mail list logo
