On Jul 30, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Fred Baker (fred) <f...@cisco.com> wrote:
> > On Jul 30, 2014, at 8:45 AM, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > >> I will say that if amazon would get off the dime and support IPv6, it would >> make a significant difference. > > Someone that works for Amazon once told me that they are primed for it now; > the question is whether their customers tick the box appropriately. > Owens-MacBook-Pro:toneAC owendelong$ host www.amazon.com www.amazon.com has address 72.21.215.232 Owens-MacBook-Pro:toneAC owendelong$ host www.google.com www.google.com has address 74.125.239.145 www.google.com has address 74.125.239.146 www.google.com has address 74.125.239.148 www.google.com has address 74.125.239.144 www.google.com has address 74.125.239.147 www.google.com has IPv6 address 2607:f8b0:4005:802::1010 It appears to me that they have failed to tick their own box correctly. I was talking about Amazon, not AWS. Yes, AWS would help too, but in terms of the Alexa list, Amazon would swing the percentage meaningfully. I don’t know to what extent AWS would swing the percentage. Owen
