On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: > > In message > <CAMfXtQwmpEqBk9CKRq2MpW15tRcuicZ_3DoJUsTBAM4=503...@mail.gmail.com>, Gary > Buhrmaster writes: >> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Jul 29, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: >> ..... >> >> Add to that over half your traffic will switch to IPv6 as long as >> >> the customer has a IPv6 capable CPE. That's a lot less logging you >> >> need to do from day 1. >> > >> > That would be nice, but I’m not 100% convinced that it is true. >> >> For the 99.99% of the users who believe that facebook and twitter >> *are* the internet, at least facebook is IPv6 enabled. 50.00%(*)! >> >> Yes, I think we can all stipulate that those participating >> on this list are different, and have different expectations, >> and different capabilities, than those other 99.99%. >> >> Gary >> >> (*) If we are going to make up statistics, four significant >> digits looks better than one. > > Enable IPv6 at home and measure the traffic. I did, which is why > I say > 50%. >
Orange Poland deployed 464XLAT on mobile and is seeing 62% native IPv6 and 38% NAT64 (slide 26) http://www.data.proidea.org.pl/plnog/12edycja/day2/track4/01_ipv6_implementation.pdf I don't have good measurements on this, but i assume the 11 million 464XLAT subscribers on T-Mobile US show a similar profile, possibly higher due to Netflix now supporting IPv6 on Android. CB > Mark > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
