For a large install I set up a solution that might help. I utilized a
Mediawiki install and its API to create, update and pull the
configuration on many IOS devices. A wiki page for the host name was
dynamically created and the configuration was placed there daily or
hourly. This allowed support to
Wow, this sounds fantastic! Have any code you can share?
Cheers,
Harry
On Feb 27, 2014 6:52 AM, Andrew Latham wrote:
>
> For a large install I set up a solution that might help. I utilized a
> Mediawiki install and its API to create, update and pull the
> configuration on many IOS devices. A w
Rancid with the git plugin can be used to attain pretty much the exact
same thing a lot more easily, if you're after an existing implementation
of it.
Cheers,
Paul
On 2/27/2014 午後 09:44, Harry Hoffman wrote:
Wow, this sounds fantastic! Have any code you can share?
Cheers,
Harry
On Feb 27,
On (2014-02-26 17:37 -0500), Robert Drake wrote:
> Consider looking at Tail-F's NCS, which according to marketing
> presentations appears to do everything I want right now. I'd like
> to believe them but I don't have any money so I can't test it out.
> :)
Tail-F is probably least bad option out
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2014-02-26 17:37 -0500), Robert Drake wrote:
>
> > Consider looking at Tail-F's NCS, which according to marketing
> > presentations appears to do everything I want right now. I'd like
> > to believe them but I don't have any money so I can'
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Ryan Shea wrote:
> A couple more thoughts, regarding
>
> Network => DB
>
> I completely agree that trying to use the network config itself as the
> authority for what we intend to be on a device is not the right long-term
> approach. There is still a problem with
On (2014-02-27 09:50 -0500), Ryan Shea wrote:
> Regarding the MD5 approach, let's also think that configlets could have
> "no" commands in them. In the NTP example I had before, if we wanted to
For DB => Template => Network it's to me very easy, but yes, each template you
make must have anti-temp
On 2/26/14, 16:22 , Ryan Shea wrote:
Howdy network operator cognoscenti,
I'd love to hear your creative and workable solutions for a way to track
in-line the configuration revisions you have on your cisco-like devices.
...
Assume that this version encoding perfectly captures what is on the ro
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Erik Muller wrote:
> At a previous job, our roll-your-own solution was a template based system(*)
> generating full configs; all the version history for template sections,
> per-router local tweaks, and generated results was kept in RCS, and the
> actual last-conf
Along those same lines, we've been using alias exec for the same thing for a
while:
Alias exec NTP 6500_NTP_V1.0.1
Alias exec bgp 6500_peer_V2.0.0
Thanks,
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Tim Durack [mailto:tdur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 11:50 AM
To: Ryan Shea
Cc
On 2/27/14, 12:21 , Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
This has been around for several years now -
http://sourceforge.net/projects/cisco-conf-rep/
But that's just archiving, like rancid, right? Still doesn't have any
correlation to the template-management side of things. While having the
backup
A lot of template management discussion focusses on using the network
configs as the canonical model of the network.
Storing the network model in the DB (whatever form that takes) is much
more sane.
There is the brownfields issue of populating that database and then
building device state from ther
On 27 February 2014 10:39, Ryan Shea wrote:
> Very cool, thanks Erik. I can think of many ways to encode version
> metadata. Probably best to be somewhere in between overly verbose (full
> version $Id / date / author for every config chunk) and being unreadable
> (base64 encoded gzip of unique con
On 27 Feb 2014, at 12:46, Erik Muller wrote:
> On 2/27/14, 12:21 , Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>> This has been around for several years now -
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/cisco-conf-rep/
>
> But that's just archiving, like rancid, right?
This is not any kind of sensible answer to the
On 2/27/14, 15:52 , Joe Abley wrote:
This is not any kind of sensible answer to the original question, but
the general approach “give ops people a shell on a box with a rancid
repository, encourage them to write scripts that do stuff” has the
potential to cause all kinds of good things to happen
Hat,
A reader suggested I reach out to you, he thought you might like a simple
graphic I put together on the Storm Center Diary post. Talked about BCP38 today.
Email me off list and I will send it.
~Richard
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Definitely. Depends what form the database takes - I don't think SQL
is the right answer here. Sticking with flat files and perl scripts as
much as possible is good guidance.
I'm biased, but I'd go with Python: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGK5jjyUBCQ
--Simon
On 27 February 2014 13:05, Erik Mu
Putting aside the fact that snippets aren’t a good way to conceptualize
deployed router code, my gut still tells me to question the question here. The
first is does this stuff change often enough to warrant a fancy versioning
solution? I have yet to see NTP deployed in a different way than whe
On Feb 26, 2014, at 12:44 PM, Brandon Galbraith
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Keegan Holley wrote:
> > More politely stated, it’s not the responsibility of the operator to decide
> > what belongs on the network and what doesn’t. Users can run any services
> > that’s not illegal
It depends on how many customers you have and what sort of contract you have
with them if any. A significant amount of attack traffic comes from
residential networks where a “one-size-fits-all” policy is definitely best.
On Feb 26, 2014, at 4:01 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Messag
My strategy, should I remember it tomorrow:
We have a business-class FIOS connection where I work and a static IP as well.
At least three people who work here have FIOS at home. I've read rumors about
business class customers who really work their phone sex getting native ipv6,
and I also heard
Hello,
We send periodic 10-15Mbps bursts of traffic to a business partner and it
appears to transition from Cogent to Century Link in Atlanta. During the
day performance is normal and latency appears acceptable on a trace route.
12 ms 13 ms 12 ms te0-6-1-7.rcr21.msp01.atlas.cogentco.com [38.8
Good luck. We've been bitching at our sales rep for years, as we've added
circuits, and haven't gotten even empty promises; just the same endless Verizon
BS about "it's being tested in select markets" although no one has ever been
able to prove that to be the case. You definitely get static IP
I echo the 'good luck' and ditto on the experience.
There's a lot of people anxious to get IPv6 on FIOS, but there seems to
be precious little movement over there.
* David Hubbard (dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com) wrote:
> Good luck. We've been bitching at our sales rep for years, as we've added
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 09:18:08PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> I echo the 'good luck' and ditto on the experience.
>
> There's a lot of people anxious to get IPv6 on FIOS, but there seems to
> be precious little movement over there.
>
> * David Hubbard (dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com) wrote:
> >
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> I echo the 'good luck' and ditto on the experience.
>
> There's a lot of people anxious to get IPv6 on FIOS, but there seems to
> be precious little movement over there.
>
it really is just an embarrassment :(
perhaps shame will work to moti
* Christopher Morrow (morrowc.li...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > There's a lot of people anxious to get IPv6 on FIOS, but there seems to
> > be precious little movement over there.
>
> it really is just an embarrassment :(
Oh, I agree, and the old
With cogent? Now you will be asking us if the Pope is really Catholic :)
On 28-Feb-2014 7:43 AM, "Aidan Scheller" wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> We send periodic 10-15Mbps bursts of traffic to a business partner and it
> appears to transition from Cogent to Century Link in Atlanta. During the
> day perf
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Christopher Morrow (morrowc.li...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> > There's a lot of people anxious to get IPv6 on FIOS, but there seems to
>> > be precious little movement over there.
>>
>> it
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Keegan Holley wrote:
> Putting aside the fact that snippets aren't a good way to conceptualize
> deployed router code, my gut still tells me to question the question here.
> The first is does this stuff change often enough to warrant a fancy
> versioning soluti
+1, which semi-large eyeball does Cogent NOT have capacity problems to?
On 2/28/2014 午前 11:55, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
With cogent? Now you will be asking us if the Pope is really Catholic :)
On 28-Feb-2014 7:43 AM, "Aidan Scheller" wrote:
Hello,
We send periodic 10-15Mbps bursts of
* Paul S. (cont...@winterei.se) wrote:
> +1, which semi-large eyeball does Cogent NOT have capacity problems to?
Soon, Comcast... Given what's going on w/ them and Netflix.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I'm already seeing a huge improvement to Comcast after Netflix moved a lot of
traffic off of the ports.
On Feb 27, 2014, at 22:21, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Paul S. (cont...@winterei.se) wrote:
>> +1, which semi-large eyeball does Cogent NOT have capacity problems to?
>
> Soon, Comcast... G
I saw the same effect after the Netflix peering started.
http://imgur.com/a/aVFAS
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Jason Canady wrote:
> I'm already seeing a huge improvement to Comcast after Netflix moved a lot
> of traffic off of the ports.
>
>
> On Feb 27, 2014, at 22:21, Stephen Frost wro
- Original Message -
> From: "Christopher Morrow"
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Stephen Frost
> wrote:
> > * Christopher Morrow (morrowc.li...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Stephen Frost
> >> wrote:
> >> > There's a lot of people anxious to get IPv6 on FIO
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Bryan Seitz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 09:18:08PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
I echo the 'good luck' and ditto on the experience.
There's a lot of people anxious to get IPv6 on FIOS, but there seems to
be precious little movement over there.
I've been fighting this b
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Tristan Lear wrote:
We have a business-class FIOS connection where I work and a static
IP as well. At least three people who work here have FIOS at home.
I've read rumors about business class customers who really work their
phone sex getting native ipv6, and I also heard s
37 matches
Mail list logo
