I echo the 'good luck' and ditto on the experience. There's a lot of people anxious to get IPv6 on FIOS, but there seems to be precious little movement over there.
* David Hubbard (dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com) wrote: > Good luck. We've been bitching at our sales rep for years, as we've added > circuits, and haven't gotten even empty promises; just the same endless > Verizon BS about "it's being tested in select markets" although no one has > ever been able to prove that to be the case. You definitely get static IP's > on business connections; that's just a matter of how much you pay and how > many you need. > > David > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tristan Lear [mailto:trissypi...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 1:45 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Verizon FIOS IPv6? > > My strategy, should I remember it tomorrow: > > We have a business-class FIOS connection where I work and a static IP as > well. At least three people who work here have FIOS at home. I've read rumors > about business class customers who really work their phone sex getting native > ipv6, and I also heard somethin about static ip's. So I'll try that, and also > mention that "we're transitioning our employees who remote in from home to > FIOS but we'd like ipv6 for ... VPN purposes, NAT traversal, etc ..." I mean, > that should get them a little wet right? > > I have a bit of a hairbrained theory that the reason ISP's have stagnated on > ipv6 has to do with relationship between capitalism and scarcity. Having a > limited quantity of anything makes it more valuable. Why wouldn't that apply > to IP's? > >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
