Along those same lines, we've been using alias exec for the same thing for a while:
Alias exec NTP 6500_NTP_V1.0.1 Alias exec bgp 6500_peer_V2.0.0 Thanks, Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Tim Durack [mailto:tdur...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 11:50 AM To: Ryan Shea Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Managing IOS Configuration Snippets On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Ryan Shea <ryans...@google.com> wrote: > A couple more thoughts, regarding > > Network => DB > > I completely agree that trying to use the network config itself as the > authority for what we intend to be on a device is not the right > long-term approach. There is still a problem with Network => DB that I > see. Assuming you have *many* devices, that may or may not be up at a > given time, or may be in various stages of turn-up / burn-in / decom > it is expected that a config change will not successfully make it to > all devices. There are other timing issues, like a config built for a > device being turned up, followed by a push of an update to all devices > that "succeeds", followed by the final turn-up of this device. Even if > you have a fancy config pushing engine, let's just take as a given > that you'll need to scrub through your rancid-git backups to determine what needs to be updated. > > Regarding the MD5 approach, let's also think that configlets could > have "no" commands in them. In the NTP example I had before, if we > wanted to remove an NTP server the configlet would need the "no" > version, but the rancid backup obviously would not have this. I'm not > trying to work a unit test assertion framework here either. Some > vendors have more robust commenting, and this can be quite convenient > for explicitly stating what was pushed to the device. What are you > using in your network... banner, snmp-location, hope, prayer? > We don't do this, but the only flexible commenting in IOS style configs is ACLs. You could have an ACL that contains remarks only, and include version information: ip access-list CFG-VER remark CFG-VER-NTP 1.0.3 remark CFG-VER-VTY 4.3.2 end You could break this into individual ACLs if you prefer: ip access-list CFG-VER-NTP remark CFG-VER-NTP 1.0.3 end ip access-list CFG-VER-VTY remark CFG-VER-VTY 4.3.2 end Seems ridiculous, but that is the sorry state of the network OS. -- Tim:>