On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > I echo the 'good luck' and ditto on the experience. > > There's a lot of people anxious to get IPv6 on FIOS, but there seems to > be precious little movement over there. >
it really is just an embarrassment :( perhaps shame will work to motivate them instead? > * David Hubbard (dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com) wrote: >> Good luck. We've been bitching at our sales rep for years, as we've added >> circuits, and haven't gotten even empty promises; just the same endless >> Verizon BS about "it's being tested in select markets" although no one has >> ever been able to prove that to be the case. You definitely get static IP's >> on business connections; that's just a matter of how much you pay and how >> many you need. >> >> David >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Tristan Lear [mailto:trissypi...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 1:45 AM >> To: nanog@nanog.org >> Subject: Verizon FIOS IPv6? >> >> My strategy, should I remember it tomorrow: >> >> We have a business-class FIOS connection where I work and a static IP as >> well. At least three people who work here have FIOS at home. I've read >> rumors about business class customers who really work their phone sex >> getting native ipv6, and I also heard somethin about static ip's. So I'll >> try that, and also mention that "we're transitioning our employees who >> remote in from home to FIOS but we'd like ipv6 for ... VPN purposes, NAT >> traversal, etc ..." I mean, that should get them a little wet right? >> >> I have a bit of a hairbrained theory that the reason ISP's have stagnated on >> ipv6 has to do with relationship between capitalism and scarcity. Having a >> limited quantity of anything makes it more valuable. Why wouldn't that apply >> to IP's? >> >>
