But it seems, that NetFPGA has not enough memory to hold a full view
(current 340k routes).
It's just a development platform for prototyping designs, not
something you would use in production...
I want to use it to implement and test ideas that I have, and play
with some different forwarding arc
Randy Bush writes:
>> http://n1.netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu/summary/id=43ca253f-6714-b0f7e7b0-d08e-4729-b491#BufferResult
>
> wow! lime's buffering and 587 hacking make me like caribbean cable more
> and more.
hmm, 587 hacking, issue with configuration, or typo?
Direct TCP connections to re
On 10-09-27 7:20 AM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> "Cannot establish SSL with SMTP server 67.202.37.63:465" does not
> sound like a 587 problem to me.
>
> netalyzr folks? comment?
Cisco PIX?
On 10-09-27 7:20 AM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> "Cannot establish SSL with SMTP server 67.202.37.63:465" does not
> sound like a 587 problem to me.
>
> netalyzr folks? comment?
Sorry, I hit send too soon ...
I've heard from a couple of people that the PIX will remap 587 (and 25)
to oddball por
On 9/25/2010 6:47 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I don't recall any protocols being standard.
I don't either, though I recall bittorrent actually supporting it once
and pushing to have ISP support and stay away from encryption/ISP
circumvention. That was years ago. Haven't stayed current.
Plent
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:30:06 PDT, Lyndon Nerenberg said:
> I've heard from a couple of people that the PIX will remap 587 (and 25)
> to oddball ports if you fiddle the config just right. Given all the
> other bogosity that box does with SMTP I wonder if there's truth to the
> rumour. (I haven't f
-Original Message-
From: Jack Bates [mailto:jba...@brightok.net]
Sent: 27 September 2010 17:39
To: Adrian Chadd
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Online games stealing your bandwidth
On 9/25/2010 6:47 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>> I don't recall any protocols being standard.
>>
>I don't either, t
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:44:37 BST, Leigh Porter said:
> We had a great P2P cache from Cache Appliance. Did anybody else try
> them?
Can you say anything about what size cache it was, and what amount
of bandwidth savings it produced?
pgpHbKjlAd43Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
With the assumption that you will have a wired backhaul to your HQ over
which the retail access-layer devices connect to commerce servers, make
sure that the wireless carrier's gateways to their wired network (where
the wired backhaul is connected to) are geographically well-dispersed
such that wir
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 21:45 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Yeah, because IOS and JUNOS don't have idiosyncrasies. :-)
Not gonna argue with you on that one. However, the world has changed
since the days where the chances of clueful unix systems engineering
knowledge and clueful BGP routing knowledge
> -Original Message-
> From: Lyndon Nerenberg [mailto:lyn...@orthanc.ca]
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 9:30 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Randy in Nevis
>
> On 10-09-27 7:20 AM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> > "Cannot establish SSL with SMTP server 67.202.37.63:465" does not
>
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:27:28 BST, Brandon Butterworth said:
> I fail to see the point. If an ISP needs to add caches they may
> as well just add a simple, cheaper, standard, http cache.
It's a bang-per-buck issue, and depends highly on whether your
particular network sees more HTTP or P2P traffic
> > I fail to see the point. If an ISP needs to add caches they may
> > as well just add a simple, cheaper, standard, http cache.
>
> It's a bang-per-buck issue, and depends highly on whether your
> particular network sees more HTTP or P2P traffic.
Orly.
No, I mean if there have to be caches why
On 27 Sep 2010, at 20:54, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
>>> I fail to see the point. If an ISP needs to add caches they may
>>> as well just add a simple, cheaper, standard, http cache.
>>
>> It's a bang-per-buck issue, and depends highly on whether your
>> particular network sees more HTTP or P2P
On 9/25/2010 13:37, Leo Woltz wrote:
> I am looking for some guidance from the list. We will soon be deploying
> wireless payment devices (CDMA/GSM). We are looking at options on where to
> locate the servers that will run the backend payment gateways; we would like
> the least amount of latency
On 9/27/2010 2:54 PM, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
No, I mean if there have to be caches why use p2p in the first place,
once there's a network of caches p2p becomes a more complicated http
and that model has been well optimised by some.
It's a redundancy factor. By participating in a p2p networ
We have looked at using open source routers for our border, but in the end we
cannot make the numbers add up. Once Cisco released the x9xx ISR2 routers, the
x8xx have tanked in price on the used market. So, for about the same as a
vyatta router running on newer hardware that you can trust you ca
We use a mix of software and hardware based routers, have found little
difference between the two platforms in terms of performance and
stability. Our software base routers are serving a couple 100Mbps
upstream links running on some HP Proliants with dual PS and dual HD's
that we picked up on e
I haven't found that to be the case. The larger memory space available to
the kernel allows for larger BGP tables and filtering tables. I've seen
BSD based systems running thousands of concurrent tunnels and the
processors available in the linux/BSD space bury anything that the router
manufactur
Do jitter sensitive applications have problems at all running?
What would you say is the point at which people should be looking for
a hardware forwarding solution?
Differences:
- Hardware forwarding
- Interface options
- Port density
- Redundancy
- Power consumption
- Service Provider stuff - MPL
Oh, support contract!!?
> Differences:
> - Hardware forwarding
> - Interface options
> - Port density
> - Redundancy
> - Power consumption
> - Service Provider stuff - MPLS TE? VPLS? VRF??
>
> Any others?
>
Dear network operators,
I apologise for a posting that contains some politics; I hope you'll agree
that it also has fairly substantial short-to-medium term operational
implications.
As you may or may not have heard, there is a censor-DNS-to-enforce-copyright
bill that is going to be passed by the
Hi,
I am doing a survey and was interested in knowing if network operators
are using OSPFv3 with authentication [RFC 4552] turned on? I know that
most providers turn on authentication with OSPFv2, but given that
OSPFv3 needs IPsec integration and can thus get little cumbersome to
configure, wanted
There's some standardization work being done in the IETF ALTO working
group. They're looking at ways ISPs can inform P2P clints about which peers
are "better", I.e., topologically nearby.
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/alto/
I'm less familiar with DECADE, but I believe they're working on more
directly
Can someone name an ISP that encourages P2P traffic?? ;)
Sent from a mobile phone with a small keyboard, please excuse my mistakes.
On Sep 27, 2010, at 4:32 PM, "Richard Barnes" wrote:
> There's some standardization work being done in the IETF ALTO working
> group. They're looking at ways ISPs
I thought the issue was more about ISPs encouraging *responsible* P2P.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Warren Bailey wrote:
> Can someone name an ISP that encourages P2P traffic?? ;)
>
> Sent from a mobile phone with a small keyboard, please excuse my mistakes.
>
> On Sep 27, 2010, at 4:32 PM,
Some large telcos with wireless and wireline operations in the US
maintain 2 separate backbones: one that I call "wired", that corresponds
to traditional wired access where commerce servers are usually located;
and one that I call a "wireless" backbone, where GSM/CDMA wireless
devices are used to a
As you may or may not have heard, there is a censor-DNS-to-enforce-copyright
bill that is going to be passed by the Senate Judiciary Committee this
Wednesday (!!!). It will require service providers to censor the DNS entries of
blacklisted domains where piracy is deemed too "central" to the site's
I have seen software based routers (FreeBSD+Quagga) in production at pennies on
the dollar compared to Cisco for quite some years.
Up front, as other people have noted, you need to know what you are doing.
There is no 'crying for help 24x7'. By the same token, if you know what you
are doing t
On Sep 27, 2010, at 9:30 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> On 10-09-27 7:20 AM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
>> "Cannot establish SSL with SMTP server 67.202.37.63:465" does not
>> sound like a 587 problem to me.
>>
>> netalyzr folks? comment?
>
> Sorry, I hit send too soon ...
>
> I've heard from a
30 matches
Mail list logo
