On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:37 PM, wrote:
> You apparently fail to understand that making other people's research well
> known in the community is an important role. Would we be more secure, or
> less secure, if somebody did the research, but then nobody told the owners
> of all that Cisco gear ab
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:04:22 PST, "andrew.wallace" said:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:
> > "That peer-review is the basic purpose of my Blackhat talk and the
> > associated paper. I plan to review Ciscoâs architecture for lawful
> > intercept
> Gadi Evron has absolutely n
ound for a gd while ...
--- On Sat, 2/6/10, Mark Smith
wrote:
> From: Mark Smith
> Subject: Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and
> recommendations
> To: "Jorge Amodio"
> Cc: "NANOG"
> Date: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 6:45 AM
&g
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:47:47 -0600
Jorge Amodio wrote:
> I'm totally ignorant (most of the time), is anybody actually using SNMPv3 ?
>
I worked with an IPsec VPN product around 10 years ago that used SNMPv3
for automated provisioning of the tunnels.
> Regards
>
- Original Message
From: Brian Keefer
To: NANOG list
Cc: a.harrow...@gmail.com; andrew.wallace
Sent: Fri, 5 February, 2010 1:55:58
Subject: Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>> Security consul
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:42:24PM -0500, Steven Bellovin wrote:
>I can make a very good case that CALEA was not just originally intended
> for voice, but was sold to Congress as something that didn't apply to data
> networks. The EFF has said it better than I could, though, so look at
> ht
On Feb 4, 2010, at 9:26 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 4, 2010, at 5:42 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Crist Clark
>>> wrote:
>>>
> this seems like much more work that matt blaze's
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
>
> On Feb 4, 2010, at 5:42 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Crist Clark
>> wrote:
>>
this seems like much more work that matt blaze's work that said:
>>> "Just
send more than 10mbps toward what yo
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
> I'm totally ignorant (most of the time), is anybody actually using SNMPv3 ?
sadly, if you are present in the US and you do ip services (public
ones) and you deployed a cisco device + calea capabilites, yes you do!
:(
-chris
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>> Security consultant
>>
>> CITATION NEEDED
>>
>
>
> You can goto Full-disclosure mailing list
> http://www.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure/ ...
> Andrew
>
> Security consultant
For "clarity and transparency" you were banned from that list for trolling
under the persona "n3td
On 04/02/10 15:58 -0800, andrew.wallace wrote:
CITATION NEEDED
You can goto Full-disclosure mailing list
http://www.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure/ and ask about "Gadi Evron".
There will be plenty folks there who will tell you he is involved in
plagiarism.
Andrew
Security consultant
That'
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:25 PM, wrote:
> -original message-
> Subject: Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and
> recommendations
> From: "andrew.wallace"
> Date: 04/02/2010 11:09 pm
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:
>> &
-original message-
Subject: Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations
From: "andrew.wallace"
Date: 04/02/2010 11:09 pm
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:
> "That peer-review is the basic purpose of my Blackhat talk and the
> ass
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:
> "That peer-review is the basic purpose of my Blackhat talk and the
> associated paper. I plan to review Cisco’s architecture for lawful intercept
> and explain the approach a bad guy would take to getting access without
> authorization. I’ll iden
On Feb 4, 2010, at 5:42 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Crist Clark
> wrote:
>
>>> this seems like much more work that matt blaze's work that said:
>> "Just
>>> send more than 10mbps toward what you want to sneak around... the
>>> LEA's pipe is saturated so noth
I'm totally ignorant (most of the time), is anybody actually using SNMPv3 ?
Regards
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Crist Clark wrote:
>> this seems like much more work that matt blaze's work that said:
> "Just
>> send more than 10mbps toward what you want to sneak around... the
>> LEA's pipe is saturated so nothing of use gets to them"
>
> The Cross/XForce/IBM talk appears more
>>> On 2/4/2010 at 12:27 PM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:
>>
>> "That peer-review is the basic purpose of my Blackhat talk and the
associated
> paper. I plan to review Cisco’s architecture for lawful intercept
and explain
> the approach a bad guy
Would you mind passing along a source/link on the 15kpps? I haven't seen
that number yet.
tv
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Morrow"
To: "Gadi Evron"
Cc: "NANOG"
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: lawful intercep
(of course for any LEA that really cares they'll just order a phyiscal
tap, and provision things properly)
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:
>
> "That peer-review is the basic purpose of my Blackhat talk and the associated
> paper. I plan to review Cisco’s architecture for lawful intercept and explain
> the approach a bad guy would take to getting access without authorization.
> I’ll
"That peer-review is the basic purpose of my Blackhat talk and the
associated paper. I plan to review Cisco’s architecture for lawful
intercept and explain the approach a bad guy would take to getting
access without authorization. I’ll identify several aspects of the
design and implementation o
22 matches
Mail list logo
