On 12/5/13 5:39 PM, Rogan Schlassa wrote:
> Please dont reply back with such legal disclaimers. It is basically SPAM
> and of course nonsense.
>
> The thought that you can send a email and force your companies terms on us
> is ridiculous.
>
> If CISCO forces that in your sig then for one tell the
*Has a Rick Perry "Oops." moment*.
Thanks, Jared.
..Again. :)
-j
t;> 111 Wood Avenue South
>>>>> Iselin, New Jersey 08830
>>>>> United States
>>>>> Cisco.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Think before you print.
>>>>> This email may contain
On Dec 7, 2013, at 8:26 AM, jamie rishaw wrote:
> (A little late but) it's reachable for me -- Funny tho that something at
> cisco is IPv6 via a v4<->v6 (2001::) :-)
>
> jamie
Huh?
2001:4800::/29 is owned by Rackspace. It's native all the way from "here"
anyway.
Mike
. Any review, use, distribution or
> >>>disclosure
> >>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> >>>recipient (or
> >>> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by
> >>> reply email and delete al
fidential and privileged material for the
>>>sole
>>> use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or
>>>disclosure
>>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>>>recipient (or
>>> authorized to recei
ate legal information go to:
>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 9:23 AM
>
Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 9:23 AM
> To: Henri Wahl
> Cc: NANOG list
> Subject: Re: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6
>
> I'm seeing it down via IPv6:
>
> * Trying 2600:1407:9:295::90...
> * Connected to www.cisco.com
/cri/index.html
-Original Message-
From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 9:23 AM
To: Henri Wahl
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6
I'm seeing it down via IPv6:
* Trying 2600:1407:9:295::90...
* Connected to
cts confirmed that they were made aware of this 12 hours
> ago and it's being worked on.
>
> Frank
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 8:23 AM
> To: Henri Wahl
> Cc: NANOG list
> Sub
m not available via IPv6
I'm seeing it down via IPv6:
* Trying 2600:1407:9:295::90...
* Connected to www.cisco.com (2600:1407:9:295::90) port 80 (#0)
> GET / HTTP/1.1
> User-Agent: curl/7.30.0
> Host: www.cisco.com
> Accept: */*
>
< HTTP/1.1 200 OK
* Server Apache is
I'm seeing it down via IPv6:
* Trying 2600:1407:9:295::90...
* Connected to www.cisco.com (2600:1407:9:295::90) port 80 (#0)
> GET / HTTP/1.1
> User-Agent: curl/7.30.0
> Host: www.cisco.com
> Accept: */*
>
< HTTP/1.1 200 OK
* Server Apache is not blacklisted
* About to connect() to blogs.cisc
Hi,
can anybody from Cisco confirm that blogs.cisco.com
(2001:4800:13c1:10::178) is not available via IPv6?
Regards
--
Henri Wahl
IT Department
Leibniz-Institut fuer Festkoerper- u.
Werkstoffforschung Dresden
tel: (03 51) 46 59 - 797
email: h.w...@ifw-dresden.de
http://www.ifw-dresden.de
Nagio
13 matches
Mail list logo
