(A little late but) it's reachable for me -- Funny tho that something at cisco is IPv6 via a v4<->v6 (2001::) :-)
jamie On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Geraint Jones <gera...@koding.com> wrote: > Its the reason deduplication makes the storage savings it does :) > -- > Geraint Jones > > > > > On 6/12/13 2:52 pm, "Richard Porter" <rich...@pedantictheory.com> wrote: > > >*Sarcasm* but lawyers seem to think it is REALLY important to add that > >load to email servers, backup servers and storage :). I wonder how much > >extra storage those simple extra bits/bytes have taken over the years? > > > >~Richard > > > >On Dec 5, 2013, at 6:39 PM, Rogan Schlassa <roganschla...@gmail.com> > >wrote: > > > >> Please dont reply back with such legal disclaimers. It is basically > >>SPAM > >> and of course nonsense. > >> > >> The thought that you can send a email and force your companies terms on > >>us > >> is rediculous. > >> > >> If CISCO forces that in your sig then for one tell them to fuck off and > >>two > >> use a different email. > >> On Dec 5, 2013 3:56 PM, "John Stuppi (jstuppi)" <jstu...@cisco.com> > >>wrote: > >> > >>> Thanks folks. Blogs.cisco.com should be back up now for both IPv4 and > >>>v6. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> John > >>> > >>> "We can't help everyone, but everyone can help someone." > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> John Stuppi, CISSP > >>> Technical Leader > >>> Strategic Security Research > >>> jstu...@cisco.com > >>> Phone: +1 732 516 5994 > >>> Mobile: 732 319 3886 > >>> > >>> CCIE, Security - 11154 > >>> Cisco Systems > >>> Mail Stop INJ01/2/ > >>> 111 Wood Avenue South > >>> Iselin, New Jersey 08830 > >>> United States > >>> Cisco.com > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Think before you print. > >>> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the > >>>sole > >>> use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or > >>>disclosure > >>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > >>>recipient (or > >>> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by > >>> reply email and delete all copies of this message. > >>> For corporate legal information go to: > >>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net] > >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 9:23 AM > >>> To: Henri Wahl > >>> Cc: NANOG list > >>> Subject: Re: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6 > >>> > >>> I'm seeing it down via IPv6: > >>> > >>> * Trying 2600:1407:9:295::90... > >>> * Connected to www.cisco.com (2600:1407:9:295::90) port 80 (#0) > >>>> GET / HTTP/1.1 > >>>> User-Agent: curl/7.30.0 > >>>> Host: www.cisco.com > >>>> Accept: */* > >>>> > >>> < HTTP/1.1 200 OK > >>> * Server Apache is not blacklisted > >>> > >>> > >>> * About to connect() to blogs.cisco.com port 80 (#0) > >>> * Trying 2001:4800:13c1:10::178... > >>> ^C > >>> > >>> - Jared > >>> > >>> On Dec 4, 2013, at 8:37 AM, Henri Wahl <h.w...@ifw-dresden.de> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> can anybody from Cisco confirm that blogs.cisco.com > >>>> (2001:4800:13c1:10::178) is not available via IPv6? > >>>> Regards > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Henri Wahl > >>>> > >>>> IT Department > >>>> Leibniz-Institut fuer Festkoerper- u. > >>>> Werkstoffforschung Dresden > >>>> > >>>> tel: (03 51) 46 59 - 797 > >>>> email: h.w...@ifw-dresden.de > >>>> http://www.ifw-dresden.de > >>>> > >>>> Nagios status monitor Nagstamon: > >>>> http://nagstamon.ifw-dresden.de > >>>> > >>>> DHCPv6 server dhcpy6d: > >>>> http://dhcpy6d.ifw-dresden.de > >>>> > >>>> IFW Dresden e.V., Helmholtzstrasse 20, D-01069 Dresden VR Dresden Nr. > >>>> 1369 > >>>> Vorstand: Prof. Dr. Juergen Eckert, Dr. h.c. Dipl.-Finw. Rolf Pfrengle > >>>> <0x1FBA0942.asc> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > > -- "sharp, dry wit and brash in his dealings with contestants." - Forbes If voting didn't matter, the GOP wouldn't make it more difficult than buying a gun. /* - teh jamie. ; uri -> http://about.me/jgr */
