*Sarcasm* but lawyers seem to think it is REALLY important to add that load to email servers, backup servers and storage :). I wonder how much extra storage those simple extra bits/bytes have taken over the years?
~Richard On Dec 5, 2013, at 6:39 PM, Rogan Schlassa <roganschla...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please dont reply back with such legal disclaimers. It is basically SPAM > and of course nonsense. > > The thought that you can send a email and force your companies terms on us > is rediculous. > > If CISCO forces that in your sig then for one tell them to fuck off and two > use a different email. > On Dec 5, 2013 3:56 PM, "John Stuppi (jstuppi)" <jstu...@cisco.com> wrote: > >> Thanks folks. Blogs.cisco.com should be back up now for both IPv4 and v6. >> >> Thanks, >> John >> >> "We can't help everyone, but everyone can help someone." >> >> >> >> >> John Stuppi, CISSP >> Technical Leader >> Strategic Security Research >> jstu...@cisco.com >> Phone: +1 732 516 5994 >> Mobile: 732 319 3886 >> >> CCIE, Security - 11154 >> Cisco Systems >> Mail Stop INJ01/2/ >> 111 Wood Avenue South >> Iselin, New Jersey 08830 >> United States >> Cisco.com >> >> >> >> Think before you print. >> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole >> use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure >> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or >> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by >> reply email and delete all copies of this message. >> For corporate legal information go to: >> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net] >> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 9:23 AM >> To: Henri Wahl >> Cc: NANOG list >> Subject: Re: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6 >> >> I'm seeing it down via IPv6: >> >> * Trying 2600:1407:9:295::90... >> * Connected to www.cisco.com (2600:1407:9:295::90) port 80 (#0) >>> GET / HTTP/1.1 >>> User-Agent: curl/7.30.0 >>> Host: www.cisco.com >>> Accept: */* >>> >> < HTTP/1.1 200 OK >> * Server Apache is not blacklisted >> >> >> * About to connect() to blogs.cisco.com port 80 (#0) >> * Trying 2001:4800:13c1:10::178... >> ^C >> >> - Jared >> >> On Dec 4, 2013, at 8:37 AM, Henri Wahl <h.w...@ifw-dresden.de> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> can anybody from Cisco confirm that blogs.cisco.com >>> (2001:4800:13c1:10::178) is not available via IPv6? >>> Regards >>> >>> -- >>> Henri Wahl >>> >>> IT Department >>> Leibniz-Institut fuer Festkoerper- u. >>> Werkstoffforschung Dresden >>> >>> tel: (03 51) 46 59 - 797 >>> email: h.w...@ifw-dresden.de >>> http://www.ifw-dresden.de >>> >>> Nagios status monitor Nagstamon: >>> http://nagstamon.ifw-dresden.de >>> >>> DHCPv6 server dhcpy6d: >>> http://dhcpy6d.ifw-dresden.de >>> >>> IFW Dresden e.V., Helmholtzstrasse 20, D-01069 Dresden VR Dresden Nr. >>> 1369 >>> Vorstand: Prof. Dr. Juergen Eckert, Dr. h.c. Dipl.-Finw. Rolf Pfrengle >>> <0x1FBA0942.asc> >> >> >> >>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
