Its the reason deduplication makes the storage savings it does :) -- Geraint Jones
On 6/12/13 2:52 pm, "Richard Porter" <rich...@pedantictheory.com> wrote: >*Sarcasm* but lawyers seem to think it is REALLY important to add that >load to email servers, backup servers and storage :). I wonder how much >extra storage those simple extra bits/bytes have taken over the years? > >~Richard > >On Dec 5, 2013, at 6:39 PM, Rogan Schlassa <roganschla...@gmail.com> >wrote: > >> Please dont reply back with such legal disclaimers. It is basically >>SPAM >> and of course nonsense. >> >> The thought that you can send a email and force your companies terms on >>us >> is rediculous. >> >> If CISCO forces that in your sig then for one tell them to fuck off and >>two >> use a different email. >> On Dec 5, 2013 3:56 PM, "John Stuppi (jstuppi)" <jstu...@cisco.com> >>wrote: >> >>> Thanks folks. Blogs.cisco.com should be back up now for both IPv4 and >>>v6. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> John >>> >>> "We can't help everyone, but everyone can help someone." >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> John Stuppi, CISSP >>> Technical Leader >>> Strategic Security Research >>> jstu...@cisco.com >>> Phone: +1 732 516 5994 >>> Mobile: 732 319 3886 >>> >>> CCIE, Security - 11154 >>> Cisco Systems >>> Mail Stop INJ01/2/ >>> 111 Wood Avenue South >>> Iselin, New Jersey 08830 >>> United States >>> Cisco.com >>> >>> >>> >>> Think before you print. >>> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the >>>sole >>> use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or >>>disclosure >>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended >>>recipient (or >>> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by >>> reply email and delete all copies of this message. >>> For corporate legal information go to: >>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net] >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 9:23 AM >>> To: Henri Wahl >>> Cc: NANOG list >>> Subject: Re: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6 >>> >>> I'm seeing it down via IPv6: >>> >>> * Trying 2600:1407:9:295::90... >>> * Connected to www.cisco.com (2600:1407:9:295::90) port 80 (#0) >>>> GET / HTTP/1.1 >>>> User-Agent: curl/7.30.0 >>>> Host: www.cisco.com >>>> Accept: */* >>>> >>> < HTTP/1.1 200 OK >>> * Server Apache is not blacklisted >>> >>> >>> * About to connect() to blogs.cisco.com port 80 (#0) >>> * Trying 2001:4800:13c1:10::178... >>> ^C >>> >>> - Jared >>> >>> On Dec 4, 2013, at 8:37 AM, Henri Wahl <h.w...@ifw-dresden.de> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> can anybody from Cisco confirm that blogs.cisco.com >>>> (2001:4800:13c1:10::178) is not available via IPv6? >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Henri Wahl >>>> >>>> IT Department >>>> Leibniz-Institut fuer Festkoerper- u. >>>> Werkstoffforschung Dresden >>>> >>>> tel: (03 51) 46 59 - 797 >>>> email: h.w...@ifw-dresden.de >>>> http://www.ifw-dresden.de >>>> >>>> Nagios status monitor Nagstamon: >>>> http://nagstamon.ifw-dresden.de >>>> >>>> DHCPv6 server dhcpy6d: >>>> http://dhcpy6d.ifw-dresden.de >>>> >>>> IFW Dresden e.V., Helmholtzstrasse 20, D-01069 Dresden VR Dresden Nr. >>>> 1369 >>>> Vorstand: Prof. Dr. Juergen Eckert, Dr. h.c. Dipl.-Finw. Rolf Pfrengle >>>> <0x1FBA0942.asc> >>> >>> >>> >>> >
