> 2)Philosophically, IPv6 and IPv4 are kind of like two religions, each
> with its own believers. As long as the devotees of each focus on their
> respective passion, the world will be peaceful. As soon as one camp imposes
> its preference onto the other, friction starts. Unchecked, it can
ce is futile."
That is the last of my .02c for this thread.
Ryan
From: NANOG on behalf of Abraham Y.
Chen via NANOG
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2024 9:06:28 AM
To: Chris Adams
Cc: Chen, Abraham Y. ; NANOG
Subject: Re: Stealthy Overlay Network Re: 202401100
Hi, Chris:
0) Thanks for your observation.
1) Although I specifically requested Karim to go offline on our idea
to his inquiry, lots of comments appeared on NANOG publicly. To be
polite, I tried to respond by clarifying and describing each.
Unfortunately, many comments are actually pers
On Jan 20, 2024, at 11:56 AM, Abraham Y. Chen wrote:
>
> Hi, Christopher:
>
> 1) "... It would simply increase the workload of their support and
> provisioning teams. Right now, in cases where ISPs use DHCP, they can simply
> ship a router to an end-user, the user plugs it in, turns it
>
> Because people keep responding.
>
Doesn't really make any difference. Mr. Chen filed his first draft in Dec
2016. He finds a reason to talk about it on every mailing list and forum
he can find, but doesn't spend any time engaging in the standards
processes, other than renewing his draft every
Once upon a time, sro...@ronan-online.com said:
> I am curious if anyone has ever given you positive feedback on this idea? So
> far
> all I’ve seen is the entire community thinking it’s a bad idea. Why do you
> insist this is a good solution?
Because people keep responding.
--
Chris Adams
I am curious if anyone has ever given you positive feedback on this idea? So far all I’ve seen is the entire community thinking it’s a bad idea. Why do you insist this is a good solution?ShaneOn Jan 20, 2024, at 11:56 AM, Abraham Y. Chen wrote:
Hi, Christopher:
1) "
Hi, Christopher:
1) " ... It would simply increase the workload of their support
and provisioning teams. Right now, in cases where ISPs use DHCP, they
can simply ship a router to an end-user, the user plugs it in, turns it
on, and away they go. ":
I do understand the current pract
: Abraham Y. Chen , nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Stealthy Overlay Network Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address
block
Why is this conversation even still going on?
It's been established ~100 messages ago that the plan here is nonsense.
it's been established ~80 messages ago that the &
Why is this conversation even still going on?
It's been established ~100 messages ago that the plan here is nonsense.
it's been established ~80 messages ago that the 'lemme swap subjects to
confuse the issue' is nonsense.
stop feeding the troll.
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:20 PM Christopher Hawker
According to the diagram on page 8 of the presentation on your website at
https://www.avinta.com/phoenix-1/home/EzIPenhancedInternet.pdf, it simply
identifies 240/4 as CGNAT space. Routing between regional access networks
typically doesn't take place when using such space on an ISP network, and
mos
Hi, Christopher:
1) " If "EzIP" is about using 240/4 as CGNAT space, ... ":
This correlation is just the starting point for EzIP deployment, so
that it would not be regarded as a base-less crazy dream. Once a 240/4
enabled RAN is established as a new network overlaying on the CG-NAT
inf
>
> If "EzIP" is about using 240/4 as CGNAT space, let's call it what it is,
> not rename something that already exists and attempt to claim it as a new
> idea.
>
Yes he is essentially re-creating NAT/CGNAT, but in a worse way.
If you ignore all the multitude of technical issues, if you grabbed a
If "EzIP" is about using 240/4 as CGNAT space, let's call it what it is,
not rename something that already exists and attempt to claim it as a new
idea.
It is completely unnecessary to use 240/4 as CGNAT space. Here are a few
reasons why:
1. There are 4,194,304 IPv4 addresses in a /10 prefix.
Hi, Christopher:
1) " Hang on... So EzIP is now about using 240/4 as CGNAT space?
Wait, I'm lost... ":
Correct. This is one way to visualize the EzIP deployment. This
configuration is so far the most concise manner to describe the the EzIP
building block, RAN (Regional Area Network)
ternet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------
> *From: *"Tom Beec
--
*From: *"Tom Beecher"
*To: *"Mike Hammett"
*Cc: *"Ryan Hamel" , "Abraham Y. Chen"
, nanog@nanog.org
*Sent: *Friday, January 12, 2024 2:06:32 PM
*Subject: *Re: Stealthy Overlay Network Re: 20240110064
uot; To: "Abraham Y. Chen" , "Vasilenko Eduard" Cc: "Abraham Y. Chen" , nanog@nanog.orgSent: Thursday, January 11, 2024 11:04:31 PMSubject: Re: Stealthy Overlay Network Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block
Abraham,
You may not need permission from the IETF, b
amel" To: "Abraham Y. Chen" , "Vasilenko Eduard" Cc: "Abraham Y. Chen" , nanog@nanog.orgSent: Thursday, January 11, 2024 11:04:31 PMSubject: Re: Stealthy Overlay Network Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block
Abraham,
You may not need permissio
rswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Tom Beecher"
> *To: *"Mike Hammett"
> *Cc: *"Ryan Hamel" , "Abraham Y. Chen" <
> ayc...@alum.mit.edu>, nanog@nan
quot;Abraham Y. Chen" ,
nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2024 2:06:32 PM
Subject: Re: Stealthy Overlay Network Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address
block
You don't need everything in the world to support it, just the things "you"
use.
You run an ISP, le
ww.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------
> *From: *"Tom Beecher"
> *To: *"Mike Hammett"
> *Cc: *"Ryan Hamel" , "Ab
lutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
From: "Ryan Hamel" < r...@rkhtech.org >
To: "Abraham Y. Chen" < ayc...@avinta.com >, "Vasilenko Eduard" <
vasilenko.edu...@huawei.com >
Cc: "Abraham Y. Chen" < ayc...@alum.m
-
> *From: *"Ryan Hamel"
> *To: *"Abraham Y. Chen" , "Vasilenko Eduard" <
> vasilenko.edu...@huawei.com>
> *Cc: *"Abraham Y. Chen" , nanog@nanog.org
> *Sent: *Thursday, January 11, 2024 11:04:31 PM
> *Subject: *Re: Ste
ternet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan Hamel"
To: "Abraham Y. Chen" , "Vasilenko Eduard"
Cc: "Abraham Y. Chen" , nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2024 11:04:31 PM
Subject: Re: Stealthy Overlay Network
.
Subject: Stealthy Overlay Network Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block
Importance: High
Hi, Vasilenko:
1)... These “multi-national conglo” has enough influence on the IETF to not
permit it.":
As classified by Vint Cerf, 240/4 enabled EzIP is an overlay network that
may be dep
Chen
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2024 6:38:52 PM
To: Vasilenko Eduard
Cc: Chen, Abraham Y. ; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Stealthy Overlay Network Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block
Caution: This is an external email and may be malicious. Please take care when
clicking links or op
Hi, Vasilenko:
1) ... These “multi-national conglo” has enough influence on the IETF
to not permit it.":
As classified by Vint Cerf, 240/4 enabled EzIP is an overlay
network that may be deployed stealthily (just like the events reported
by the RIPE-LAB). So, EzIP deployment does not n
28 matches
Mail list logo
