Since it’s come up on the list and we haven’t given a public update
recently, I thought I’d just write a quick note on the state of
INOC-DBA. For those who aren’t familiar with it, INOC-DBA is a
SIP-based hotline communications system between NOCs and CERTs:
https://www.pch.net/services
On 30/09/2015, at 6:19 AM, Matthew Walster wrote:
> "lolz" as the kids say.
Current stats indicate it's actually only the old-timers that say lolz now
days! ;)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/facebook-study-laughter_55c8b148e4b0f1cbf1e5857e
Pete
We have a big, red rotary phone that sits in our NOC that we have
attached to a VoIP box just to use for that. :)
On 9/29/2015 10:05 AM, Bob Evans wrote:
Nice of you to check Jim. This brings up the old idea - A long time ago I
had an INOC phone by PCH.NET - It never rang, as we filter our outb
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 1:29 PM, N M wrote:
> If this is anything like what I deal with the aging timer for the bgp
> session is set to 180s by default. After 2 years I've been unable to get
> the charter noc to enable bfd on my links to address this issue
because bfd brings it's own special sor
If this is anything like what I deal with the aging timer for the bgp
session is set to 180s by default. After 2 years I've been unable to get
the charter noc to enable bfd on my links to address this issue
On Sep 29, 2015 10:59 AM, "Seth Mattinen" wrote:
> On 9/29/15 8:18 AM, Rampley Jr, Jim F
On 29 September 2015 at 17:13, Bob Evans
wrote:
> Neils, do you actually work at in a NOC operation with BGP operations and
> policies you can change - a backbone with customers?
"lolz" as the kids say.
> SayAn email/ text might work well or even better than SIP - if we had
> an APP th
Neils, do you actually work at in a NOC operation with BGP operations and
policies you can change - a backbone with customers? If not - I would
understand why email is fast enough for you.
Maybe SIP iNOC phone isn't the right answer - but it seems to work fine
everywhere I go. There just has to be
Well, there *is* outa...@outages.org... :-)
- Original Message -
> From: "Royce Williams"
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 11:31:54 AM
> Subject: Re: PCH.net questions and thoughts - Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015
On 9/29/15 8:18 AM, Rampley Jr, Jim F wrote:
>
This issue was caused by a hung BGP process which was resolved last night.
Nothing nefarious. No static configuration nailed up, no BGP highjacking
purposely done. ;)
Is there a Cisco bug ID?
~Seth
* j...@baylink.com (Jay Ashworth) [Tue 29 Sep 2015, 17:31 CEST]:
The idea of a private tieline network that is connected, by SIP, to a line
appearance in the NOC of each AS, and no one else is on it, seems like a
fine idea to me.
Until you take into account that SIP doesn't work through many
fi
On Sep 28, 2015, at 11:59 PM, Bob Evans wrote:
>
> Would be nice if our membership organization ARIN ( that we all pay to
> keep us somewhat organized) had an ability to do something for you I
> never looked into it...i don't knowmaybe it does ?
>
No one else has said this, so…
RPKI.
On Tue 2015-Sep-29 11:19:57 -0400, Jay Ashworth wrote:
:
Show of hands: who has it set up, correctly, right now?
I had this in my to-do, and this thread poked me again to get on with it.
Sadly, https://inoc-dba-web.pch.net/inoc-dba/console.cgi?op=new_account
gives me:
Account sign u
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Job Snijders wrote:
>
> Hi Bob,
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 08:05:45AM -0700, Bob Evans wrote:
> > This seems like a very good proper civil approach - maybe this or
> > something like it ARIN might help promote and endorse as a benefit to
> > the community ? Be nic
rrectly, right now?
- Original Message -
> From: "Job Snijders"
> To: "Bob Evans"
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 11:12:43 AM
> Subject: Re: PCH.net questions and thoughts - Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115
> Hi Bob,
>
On 9/29/15, 9:49 AM, "Seth Mattinen" wrote:
>On 9/29/15 7:26 AM, Rampley Jr, Jim F wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/28/15, 10:24 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Seth Mattinen"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/28/15 20:19, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Is this related to 104.73.161.0/24? That's ours. :-)
We'll ta
I have actually found this NANOG email to be more effective than a chat or
mombook public service. We need something more private like that.
Thank You
Bob Evans
CTO
> A friend is not someone that allows their company to hijack your prefixes.
> A friend is one that can get it to stop. Dude - wa
A friend is not someone that allows their company to hijack your prefixes.
A friend is one that can get it to stop. Dude - wake up and drink some
coffee.
Thank You
Bob Evans
CTO
> Hi Bob,
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 08:05:45AM -0700, Bob Evans wrote:
>> This seems like a very good proper civil
Hi Bob,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 08:05:45AM -0700, Bob Evans wrote:
> This seems like a very good proper civil approach - maybe this or
> something like it ARIN might help promote and endorse as a benefit to
> the community ? Be nice if with the cash they did something simple
> like this and got al
Nice of you to check Jim. This brings up the old idea - A long time ago I
had an INOC phone by PCH.NET - It never rang, as we filter our outbound
with detail everywhere we announce. ISPs need to provide us their address
list.
And the few times I needed to use it , no one ever answered. ( It was a
On 9/29/15 7:26 AM, Rampley Jr, Jim F wrote:
On 9/28/15, 10:24 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Seth Mattinen"
wrote:
On 9/28/15 20:19, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Is this related to 104.73.161.0/24? That's ours. :-)
We'll take a look and get back to you. Thanks for caring!
Yep, that's one of the
On 29/Sep/15 16:26, Rampley Jr, Jim F wrote:
>
> Hi Seth, which market was this occurring? Was this already removed? I'm
> not seeing it this morning. I would like to figure out what went wrong
> here. We shouldn't be nailing up any static configuration to have caused
> a situation like this
On 9/28/15, 10:24 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Seth Mattinen"
wrote:
>On 9/28/15 20:19, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>>
>>Is this related to 104.73.161.0/24? That's ours. :-)
>>
>>We'll take a look and get back to you. Thanks for caring!
>>
>
>
>Yep, that's one of the affected prefixes.
>
>~Seth
Hi Seth,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Bob Evans wrote:
>
>
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Bob Evans
>> wrote:
>>> That's something I would do. Announce announce and keep adding ports
>>> until
>>> I hit a 10 Gig port worth of traffic or saw it fixed. Be sure to put in
>>> a
>>> blackhole route f
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Bob Evans
> wrote:
>> That's something I would do. Announce announce and keep adding ports
>> until
>> I hit a 10 Gig port worth of traffic or saw it fixed. Be sure to put in
>> a
>> blackhole route for the prefixes. Try to pick blocks that are as
>> geographi
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, Seth Mattinen wrote:
I'm at the tail end here almost 8 hours later since the hijacking started.
Their NOC is just blowing me off now and they're happy to continue the
hijacking until it's convenient for them to have a maintenance window. And
that's apparently the final deci
anog@nanog.org]
Subject: Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115
+1, this is the only sensible advice here.
NSPs actually do seem to care about not letting things like these happen.
On 2015/09/29 01:24 PM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> At 23:11 28/09/2015 -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
>> Start
+1, this is the only sensible advice here.
NSPs actually do seem to care about not letting things like these happen.
On 2015/09/29 01:24 PM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
At 23:11 28/09/2015 -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
Start announcing their prefixes?
Contact the upstreams of AS20115 - Cogent, Leve
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Bob Evans
wrote:
> That's something I would do. Announce announce and keep adding ports until
> I hit a 10 Gig port worth of traffic or saw it fixed. Be sure to put in a
> blackhole route for the prefixes. Try to pick blocks that are as
> geographically located t
At 23:11 28/09/2015 -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
Start announcing their prefixes?
Contact the upstreams of AS20115 - Cogent, Level3, HE and XO.
-Hank
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sep 28, 2015 11:09 PM, "Seth Mattinen" wrot
That's something I would do. Announce announce and keep adding ports until
I hit a 10 Gig port worth of traffic or saw it fixed. Be sure to put in a
blackhole route for the prefixes. Try to pick blocks that are as
geographically located to your peering routers as possible ...IE in Reno
pick the blo
On 9/28/15 20:19, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Is this related to 104.73.161.0/24? That's ours. :-)
We'll take a look and get back to you. Thanks for caring!
Yep, that's one of the affected prefixes.
~Seth
Is this related to 104.73.161.0/24? That's ours. :-)
We'll take a look and get back to you. Thanks for caring!
Best,
Marty
> On Sep 28, 2015, at 23:08, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>
>> On 9/28/15 18:30, William Herrin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>>> I've go
Start announcing their prefixes?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sep 28, 2015 11:09 PM, "Seth Mattinen" wrote:
> On 9/28/15 18:30, William Herrin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Seth Mattinen
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I've go
On 9/28/15 18:30, William Herrin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
I've got a problem where AS20115 continues to announce prefixes after BGP
neighbors were shutdown. They claim it's a wedged BGP process but aren't in
any hurry to fix it outside of a maintenance window
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> I've got a problem where AS20115 continues to announce prefixes after BGP
> neighbors were shutdown. They claim it's a wedged BGP process but aren't in
> any hurry to fix it outside of a maintenance window.
If they weren't lying to you, they
I've got a problem where AS20115 continues to announce prefixes after
BGP neighbors were shutdown. They claim it's a wedged BGP process but
aren't in any hurry to fix it outside of a maintenance window.
I'm at a loss of what else I can do. They admit the problem but won't
take action saying it
36 matches
Mail list logo
