On 9/29/15 7:26 AM, Rampley Jr, Jim F wrote:
On 9/28/15, 10:24 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Seth Mattinen"
<nanog-boun...@nanog.org on behalf of se...@rollernet.us> wrote:
On 9/28/15 20:19, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Is this related to 104.73.161.0/24? That's ours. :-)
We'll take a look and get back to you. Thanks for caring!
Yep, that's one of the affected prefixes.
~Seth
Hi Seth, which market was this occurring? Was this already removed? I'm
not seeing it this morning. I would like to figure out what went wrong
here. We shouldn't be nailing up any static configuration to have caused
a situation like this.
Reno, NV. I do believe they've finally withdrawn this morning (I just
woke up, it was a long night).
~Seth
