On 9/29/15 8:18 AM, Rampley Jr, Jim F wrote: >
This issue was caused by a hung BGP process which was resolved last night. Nothing nefarious. No static configuration nailed up, no BGP highjacking purposely done. ;)
Is there a Cisco bug ID? ~Seth
On 9/29/15 8:18 AM, Rampley Jr, Jim F wrote: >
This issue was caused by a hung BGP process which was resolved last night. Nothing nefarious. No static configuration nailed up, no BGP highjacking purposely done. ;)
Is there a Cisco bug ID? ~Seth