On 9/28/15, 10:24 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Seth Mattinen" <nanog-boun...@nanog.org on behalf of se...@rollernet.us> wrote:
>On 9/28/15 20:19, Martin Hannigan wrote: >> >>Is this related to 104.73.161.0/24? That's ours. :-) >> >>We'll take a look and get back to you. Thanks for caring! >> > > >Yep, that's one of the affected prefixes. > >~Seth Hi Seth, which market was this occurring? Was this already removed? I'm not seeing it this morning. I would like to figure out what went wrong here. We shouldn't be nailing up any static configuration to have caused a situation like this.
