On Jun 20, 2011 9:47 AM, "Christopher Pilkington" wrote:
>
> On Jun 20, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Jon Lewis wrote:
>
> > internet connectivity, and that much $ is at stake, you're stupid if you
don't have some redundancy. Nothing works all the time forever.
>
> I can't consider Cogent even a redundant
>
>> internet connectivity, and that much $ is at stake, you're stupid if you
>> don't have some redundancy. Nothing works all the time forever.
>
> I can't consider Cogent even a redundant link, since I need two other
> upstreams to reach the Internet redundantly.
>
> -cjp
>
Well, they aren't s
On Jun 20, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Jon Lewis wrote:
> internet connectivity, and that much $ is at stake, you're stupid if you
> don't have some redundancy. Nothing works all the time forever.
I can't consider Cogent even a redundant link, since I need two other
upstreams to reach the Internet redu
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011, George B. wrote:
I suppose the moral of the story is: "never single-home to Cogent"
The moral is multihome. It gets real old hearing people whine that
they're losing $XXX,XXX.XX per hour, minute, whatever, when their internet
access fails...but they spend some tiny fra
> From geor...@gmail.com Sun Jun 19 17:48:31 2011
> Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:48:32 -0700
> Subject: Re: Cogent depeers ESnet
> From: "George B."
> To: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
> Cc: Robert Bonomi , nanog@nanog.org
>
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:47 PM, wrote:
&g
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:47 PM, wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 03:15:09 CDT, Robert Bonomi said:
>
>> Anybody got draft language for a SLA clause that requires routing 'at least
>> one hop _past_ the provider's network edge' for every AS visible at major
>> public peering points and/or LookingGlas
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 03:15:09 CDT, Robert Bonomi said:
> Anybody got draft language for a SLA clause that requires routing 'at least
> one hop _past_ the provider's network edge' for every AS visible at major
> public peering points and/or LookingGlass sites?
*every* ASN? Oh my. ;)
pgpZ65dL0bm
On Jun 19, 2011, at 4:16 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
>>
> Anybody got draft language for a SLA clause that requires routing 'at least
> one hop _past_ the provider's network edge' for every AS visible at major
> public peering points and/or LookingGlass sites?
This is relevant to my interests. I'd
> From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Sun Jun 19 01:46:06
> 2011
> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 23:44:28 -0700
> Subject: Re: Cogent depeers ESnet
> From: "George B."
> To: Nick Hilliard
> Cc: "nanog@nanog.org"
>
> On Sat
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Slightly old news, but it looks like Cogent depeered ESnet last week:
>
>>
>> http://www.es.net/news-and-publications/esnet-news/2011/important-status-announcement-regarding-cogent-connectivity/
>
> Current traceroutes indicate that ESnet is
Slightly old news, but it looks like Cogent depeered ESnet last week:
http://www.es.net/news-and-publications/esnet-news/2011/important-status-announcement-regarding-cogent-connectivity/
Current traceroutes indicate that ESnet is reaching Cogent via 6939_1299.
In other news, automatically dro
11 matches
Mail list logo
