> From geor...@gmail.com Sun Jun 19 17:48:31 2011 > Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:48:32 -0700 > Subject: Re: Cogent depeers ESnet > From: "George B." <geor...@gmail.com> > To: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu > Cc: Robert Bonomi <bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com>, nanog@nanog.org > > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:47 PM, <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu> wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 03:15:09 CDT, Robert Bonomi said: > > > >> Anybody got draft language for a SLA clause that requires routing 'at > >> least one hop _past_ the provider's network edge' for every AS visible > >> at major public peering points and/or LookingGlass sites? > > > > *every* ASN? Oh my. ;)
No, not an *unqualified* "every ASN". Merely every one that is 'publicly visible' at any 'signficiant' point on the network. <*GRIN*> > > I would qualify that a bit to say "every ASN available at every peering > point at which the provider appears". I wrote it the way I did, because I expressly did not want that loophole. If a provider claims they provide 'complete' Internet acess, the idea is to require _complete_ access.
