On Jun 20, 2011 9:47 AM, "Christopher Pilkington" <c...@0x1.net> wrote: > > On Jun 20, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Jon Lewis <jle...@lewis.org> wrote: > > > internet connectivity, and that much $ is at stake, you're stupid if you don't have some redundancy. Nothing works all the time forever. > > I can't consider Cogent even a redundant link, since I need two other > upstreams to reach the Internet redundantly. >
This is the same case I face with level3 today. I have about 5 upstream isp's and level3 is the only one that does not have a "full ipv6 table" and therefore sites where level3 is one of the 2 upstreams are not redundant. I have calls into my account team, the response they gave me was laughable. .... something about how only 0.3% of the internet uses ipv6. Escalating .... if you can, it might be an opportune time for other level3 customers consider an escalation. Their lack of a full table contributes to the aaaa breakage / risk. This is not acceptable. Buying from cogent is its own reward, level3 should not be a service risk in itself. Cb > -cjp >
