> From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi....@nanog.org Sun Jun 19 01:46:06 > 2011 > Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 23:44:28 -0700 > Subject: Re: Cogent depeers ESnet > From: "George B." <geor...@gmail.com> > To: Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org> > Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org> > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > Slightly old news, but it looks like Cogent depeered ESnet last week: > > > >> > >> http://www.es.net/news-and-publications/esnet-news/2011/important-statu > >> s-announcement-regarding-cogent-connectivity/ > > > > Current traceroutes indicate that ESnet is reaching Cogent via > > 6939_1299. > > > > In other news, automatically dropping interconnects at around the time > > of your HQ's close of business while your peering co-ordinator is on > > vacation seems to be the new gold standard. > > > > Nick > > I suppose the moral of the story is: "never single-home to Cogent"
Anybody got draft language for a SLA clause that requires routing 'at least one hop _past_ the provider's network edge' for every AS visible at major public peering points and/or LookingGlass sites? <*EVIL* grin>
