the spectrum should interrogate the
parameters associated with deals that seem (perhaps superficially) too good
to be true.
steve ulrich (sulr...@botwerks.org)
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 20:51 Lu Heng wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Throughout the 20th century, humanity has consistently demonstr
ort ANY prefix to your
address space. If there’s a supernet that covers the smaller NO_EXPORT prefix,
that handles the routing issue.
-Steve
can provide the routing you want.
-Steve
> On Jan 22, 2024, at 4:49 AM, William Herrin wrote:
>
> Howdy,
>
> Does anyone have suggestions for dealing with networks who ignore my
> BGP route prepends?
>
> I have a primary ingress with no prepends and then several distant
If your issue is with your account on the NANOG website (as opposed to the
mailing list), you can also request help from the admins by filling out the
form at https://www.nanog.org/contact/.
Steve
> On Jan 2, 2024, at 11:47 AM, Luiz Rosas wrote:
>
> Thanks, I'll check it
$dayjob has transit from 1299 in Miami. We’ve been seeing packet loss nearby
in their network since around 06:00 UTC, still ongoing.
Steve
> On Oct 24, 2023, at 8:20 AM, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
>
> We also observed this today, UTC morning, esp. across the pond, and our
> alter
XX was running for a Board Seat at APNIC and may have been in
attendance in the recent APNIC conference.
Very controversial stuff there, with lessons to be learned and
remembered and situations to be avoided at all costs.
Corruption and $$$.
On 9/15/2023 3:05 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
A mu
erience ive had with hat is spectrum in my area and charter
> communications. Would that be what you are after ?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 11, 2023, at 08:54, Steve Saner via NANOG wrote:
>
> We are a combination fiber and fixed wireless ISP with around 20k
> subscribers.
>
>
.
--
*Steve Saner* | Senior Network Engineer
ideatek INTERNET FREEDOM™ FOR ALL
316-640-8715 ext. 4005 | 111 Old Mill St., Buhler KS,67522 |
<http://ideatek.com/>ideatek.com
This email transmission and any documents, files or previous email messages
attached to it may contain confidential informati
G are solid partners, and colocate events OFTEN, so its a great
place for DNS @ NANOG if you will.
I have facilitated more than a few connections to the DNS world there.
Thanks,
Steve Sullivan
Membership Coordinator
OARC Mattermost Chat: @stevos
On 8/31/2023 10:10 AM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
On Thu, A
Tom Beecher wrote on 8/30/23 8:22 AM:
vendors should adopt RFC7606
Yes
and not be absolutely awful at responding to vulnerability
reporting.
1. This isn't exactly new. It's been possible to do this since the
original days of BGP.
Literally the first thing that came into my m
Have you considered hosting a Ripe Anchor?
https://atlas.ripe.net/anchors/about/
Minimal cost, good of the Internet project, good insights, answers the use case
you describe.
Steve P
I always looked at Comcast's caps as pre-emptive fodder for future FCC
bargaining. The next time they want to do something with the FCC's approval
and the commission wanted a concession, they would offer it up for the
block.
-Steve
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 1:41 AM Crist Clark wrote:
It was brought to my attn in a PM that the DNS Affinity group may not be
that easy to find.
Try this link: <https://community.nanog.org/t/dns-affinity-group/>.
Steve
On 5/30/2023 11:53 AM, Steve Sullivan wrote:
Hi Earl,
Have you tried posting this on the DNS Affinity group in the
they all hanging out?
Steve
On 5/30/2023 9:56 AM, Eric Sieg wrote:
Earl,
Reach out to hel...@verizon.com. That'll open a ticket that you can
track. I can't promise how quick it'll be, but you should get someone
that can help.
On 5/30/2023 9:14 AM, Ruberts, Earl via NANO
recently,
I’m on 13.4 now.
I only fire up outlook to adjust filters on e-mail.
Steve
> On 23 May 2023, at 12:42, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> It may just be me, or it may not, but figured I'd ask... it seems like
> Microsoft's 365 cloud service does not
on our self-hosted
Mattermost server. Our chat server is where OARC meets the wider DNS
Community.
Also, I will be at NANOG 88 in Seattle in June if anyone would like to
meet up.
Regards,
Steve Sullivan
Membership Coordinator
OARC Mattermost Chat: @stevos
On 5/16/2023 8:52 AM, Steve Sulliva
Hi Willy,
I will ping the OARC team on your email. Something might be up with the
list.
Steve
On 5/15/2023 8:38 PM, Willy Manga wrote:
Hi,
DNS speaking, I can query G root servers; at least, that's the most
important.
However, from several sites, either on IPv4 or IPv6, I cannot p
William Herrin wrote on 9/16/22 9:28 AM:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 9:09 AM Steve Noble wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022, 8:55 AM John Curran wrote:
It’s an artifact of our formation that we are presently providing services to
any customers absent any agreement
and while ARIN continues to do so
John Curran wrote on 9/16/22 9:30 AM:
On 16 Sep 2022, at 12:26 PM, Steve Noble <mailto:sno...@sonn.com>> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022, 9:23 AM John Curran <mailto:jcur...@arin.net>> wrote:
Steve -
If you have IPv4 or IPv6 resources under an RSA/LRSA, then y
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022, 9:23 AM John Curran wrote:
>
> On 16 Sep 2022, at 12:09 PM, Steve Noble wrote:
>
> (This is the direction that the ARIN Board of Trustees has set based on
>> community input; I will note that
>> the ARIN Board is itself elected by the commun
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022, 8:55 AM John Curran wrote:
> Tom -
>
> It’s an artifact of our formation that we are presently providing services
> to any customers absent any agreement
> and while ARIN continues to do so (by providing basic services to legacy
> customers), the long-term direction is
> to
sersurvey
We'd really appreciate more input from the community on what we're doing well,
could be doing better, etc. Thanks!
-Steve
> On Aug 12, 2021, at 3:27 PM, Steve McManus wrote:
>
> PeeringDB is looking at participating at an upcoming NANOG Hackathon. One of
> th
umentation.
Please take the survey here: https://surveyhero.com/c/peeringdb2021usersurvey
You have about a month to fill it in - it will be open until 23:59 on October
8th.
You can read more about the survey here:
https://docs.peeringdb.com/blog/peeringdb_2021_user_survey/
Thanks!
-Steve
date.
Our transits we use data from the weekly routing table reports and allow some
expansion room.
So far this works for us
Regards
Steve
in
email, even if they're not strictly Hackathon ideas. They are always
appreciated!
Thanks!
-Steve
PeeringDB Product Committee chair
Unless, of course, your BGP policy was written long before that RFC was
established and you didn't think it was worth the config upgrade to support
something that had been in use since around 1998 or so :)
-Steve
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 10:27 AM Daniel Suchy via NANOG
wrote:
&g
Hi,
Contact the SBL team via the Lookup form at https://check.spamhaus.org/
The form says 'IP or Domain' but it will also look up ASNs so just put your ASN
in. That will allow you to create a ticket with the right team and the issue
should then get dealt with fairly quickly.
Regards
This is good to know. I have also considered it for a number of things.
Glad to know that it works.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 10:30 AM John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Steve Saner said:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >The issue is not an understanding of how to run the system. Th
3:26 PM, Steve Saner wrote:
> > The current platform is a custom collection of open source software,
> smtp,
> > imap, pop, webmail. Web hosting is a basic LAMP stack all php 5.2 or
> > greater. There is no interest in growing these services.
>
> Ok, so this really doesn
The current platform is a custom collection of open source software, smtp,
imap, pop, webmail. Web hosting is a basic LAMP stack all php 5.2 or
greater. There is no interest in growing these services.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 11:02 AM Bryan Fields wrote:
> On 7/6/21 10:41 AM, Steve Saner wr
revenue coming from these services, but cost of maintenance is
becoming a challenge. We are looking at migrating to another platform or
completely discontinuing those services.
I'm wondering if others here have gone through that process and have any
advice as to how to go about it.
--
oking at a solution
to support 5k to 15k customers and bandwidth up to around 30-40 gig as a
starting point. A solution that is as transparent to user experience as
possible is a priority.
Thanks
--
Steve Saner
ideatek HUMAN AT OUR VERY FIBER
This email transmission, and any documents, files o
our virtual platform!
Sincerely,
Steve Feldman
On behalf of the NANOG PC
We're still looking for more responses to the PeeringDB survey. Most people
took about 2-3 minutes to fill it in, so it's pretty short. Please give us your
feedback if you have a moment:
https://surveyhero.com/c/f7be5236
-Steve
> On Nov 2, 2020, at 3:43 PM, Steve M
early in 2021.
Steve McManus on behalf of PeeringDB Product Committee
My viewing of their website only lists i...@ocix.net (which I’ll
include here in plain because it’s in plain on their website).
A few OCIX members are listed on their members page (web.archive.org
version here:
http://web.archive.org/web/20191202000450/http://www.ocix.net/ocix/index.php?option
g any further into an IOS XE
> platform could be dicey at best, egg-face at worst.
>
> I could be wrong...
never underestimate the desire of product managers and engineering teams to
have their own petri dishes to swim around in.
--
steve ulrich (sulrich@botwerks.*)
e, let me know
your support ticket information and I'll attempt to escalate it.
Steve
> On May 18, 2020, at 9:21 AM, Jesse DuPont
> wrote:
>
> Good morning. Does anyone have an email contact for CBS All Access streaming
> NOC? We're struggling with what appear to
What that large flow in a single LSP? Is this something that FAT lsp would
fix?
-Steve
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 5:33 PM Nimrod Levy wrote:
> I just ran into an issue that I thought was worth sharing with the NANOG
> community. With recently increased visibility on keeping the In
In Canada the CRTC really needs to get on Canadian ISPs about peering very
liberally at IXs in each province. I know of one major institution right now
that would have a major work from home issue resolved if one big ISP would peer
with one big tier 1 in the IX they are both located at in the sa
Noticing a few major ISPs not peering with other major networks at their local
IXs, instead taking cross country trips. I am sure this isn't helping
congestion right now and I have heard from some people it is really affecting
their remote users. People in the same city with 80ms-100ms latencies
On 3/17/20 8:25 PM, Craig wrote:
Then comes the task of getting the legacy wiki pages off the Mac wiki
server over to the new wiki
Oh, man. If you figure that one out, let me know. I'm in the same boat
there.
r than the peak dropping at all, the peak will stretch over
a longer time period.
-Steve
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 6:50 PM Tom Paseka via NANOG
wrote:
> I am not worried. Residential ISPs are usually at peak in the late
> evening. They have loads of capacity during the day.
>
> On Thu
The *.he.net cert expired today so the looking glass is inaccessible from
chrome if anyone here has a contact to rectify
ntil next week.
Steve
Has anyone here worked with DiviNetworks (https://divinetworks.com/) to
"sell" their unused bandwidth?
I'd be curious to hear any thoughts or experiences.
Steve
--
--
Steven Saner
You should be able to do that with Sflow, which they all/most support.
Also, this seems like standard Ifmib stuff, any snmp poller should be able
to handle that, from a metrics perspective .
-Steve
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 4:31 PM Mike Hammett wrote:
> I asked over at https://puck.nether.
In my local municipality (as part of a contract renegotiation) we swapped
support of the coaxial iNet in favor of dark fiber between specific
buildings, that we would be in charge of lighting ourselves.
-Steve
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:15 AM Brandon Price
wrote:
> Are you sure it’s e
Contact the licensing authority for your municipality. There is typically a
government liaison position that *might* be able to help. If it's fiber,
you have a slightly better chance of it actually being documented, but only
slightly :)
-Steve
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 2:29 PM Stephen M
>Another misconception. Humans (by and large) count in decimal, base 10.
>IPv4 is not that. It only LOOKS like that. In fact, the similarity to familiar
>decimal numbers is one of the reasons that people who are new to networking
>stumble early on, find CIDR challenging, etc.
Go ahead and read
t I really feel like ipv6 could have
> been made more human friendly and ipv4 interoperable.
>
>> On Oct 2, 2019, at 8:49 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/2/19 3:03 PM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
>>> The next largest hurdle is trying to explain to your server
In my experience, the biggest hurdle to installing a pure IPv6 has nothing to
do with network gear or network engineers. That stuff I expect to support v6.
This biggest hurdle is the dumb stuff like machinery interfaces, surveillance
devices, the must have IP interface on such and such of an o
> And for bonus points, consider the following: what if all certification
> bodies of equipment, for certifications like FCC’s or CE in Europe, for
> applications after Jan 1st 2023 would include a “MUST NOT support IPv4”..
I think a good start would be: "MUST support IPv6"!
It's certainly financial but it's not just companies being cheap. For example
for smaller companies with a limited staff and small margins. They may want to
have v6 everywhere but lack the resources to do it. It would for certain speed
up the process but there would be collateral damage in the p
A few thoughts:
1. What global organization has the ability to impose a tax on any
nation’s citizens?
2. Do you not see an issue with making everyone worldwide get rid of every
device that supports v4? Kind of a burden for a developing country, no? Also,
a bit of an e-waste proble
Just a tip, but you cannot really determine packet loss on an MPLS network with
a traceroute. The nodes between the provider edge routers may not even
represent your real path. Also, provider routers within their network will be
handling pings much differently than they handle your actual traf
Very interesting story great work Ronald
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Ronald F. Guilmette
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 2:27 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: The Curious Case of 143.95.0.0/16
Fair Warning: Those of you not enamored of my long-winded exposés of var
> OK, I'll bite. What reasons are they giving for their resistance? (And
> if known,
> what are the *real* reasons if different?)
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/2018-October/thread.html
--
Steve P
So, if ARIN allocates a v6 assignment to ARDC how do you plan to use it without
a router or BGP. Whether it's v4 or v6 you need to route it somewhere. If you
have a PC, you can have a router and if you don't have a PC you probably don't
need to worry about any of this. If your club can't aff
Why bother purchasing space? CGNAT or v6 would both be better ways to go and
future proof. The v4 space you purchase today will be essentially worthless.
Steven Naslund
Chicago IL
>I really just want to know how I can purchase some more of that 44.
>space :)
How about this? If you guys think your organization (club, group of friends,
neighborhood association, whatever...) got screwed over by the ARDC, then why
not apply for your own v6 allocation. You would then have complete control
over its handling and never have to worry about it again. If yo
>I can guarantee you that Akamai is very much run by beancounters in addition
>to engineers. I have first hand experience with that.
>
>I can also assure you that it’s quite unlikely that any of Comcast, Netflix,
>Facebook, Google, AT&T, T-Mobile, or Verizon just to name a few of the biggest
>ar
In defense of John and ARIN, if you did not recognize that ARDC represented an
authority for this resource, who would be? The complaints would have been even
more shrill if ARIN took it upon themselves to “represent” the amateur radio
community and had denied the request or re-allocated the ass
I think the Class E block has been covered before. There were two reasons to
not re-allocate it.
1. A lot of existing code base does not know how to handle those addresses
and may refuse to route them or will otherwise mishandle them.
2. It was decided that squeezing every bit of sp
Even if QoS on the Internet was possible it would be destroyed by everyone
marking all their traffic with the highest priority to get the best
performance. Tragedy of the commons.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 10:40 AM
To: nanog@nan
esponse back after that was that it isn't in the IRR. I wrote back
showing that it in fact was in the IRR.
After a couple days of no response I commented the ticket again asking
for the issue to be escalated. Finally got a response back that it had
entication
of some sort adopted by their customers. But a lot of them didn't do
that (partly, I suspect, because the ESP account was accessed by
multiple employees) and even if they did that didn't stop the lists
that had already been downloaded.
Actual compromises of the ESP, or bad behaviour of it's employees,
seem to be rather rare but customer account compromise is
everywhere.
Cheers,
Steve
You might want to check with a company called Transtelco. They are an
alternate fiber provider (outside of Telmex).
Steven Naslund
Chicago IL
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Mehmet Akcin
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 9:20 AM
To: nanog
Subject: Mexico
Hi there
I am looking for dark fibre in several
Agreed, I remember the biggest problem when the Starr Report was released was
that our dial-up PoPs had all lines busy. It was a different Internet then.
Steven Naslund
Chicago IL
> Hey Mike.
>
> Agreed. But the scale of a 400 page document with global interest?
> Should be highly cached with
over the same cabling where they
were provided about 60+ standard def channels.
Any guidance appreciated.
Best;
Steve
ering route, is that route valid, and if not,
will we recurse and look for another covering route that is valid?
Either way, we'll be updating our software with that functionality shortly.
-Steve
e right
max-length but the ASN associated w/ it is 0 (explicit invalid)
If anyone would like more information please hit me up offline.
-Steve
Brandon Martin wrote on 3/9/19 12:18 PM:
On 3/9/19 11:36 AM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
I could be making this up, but my understanding is that the Broadcom
SDK is not free, and without the SDK, hardware interaction is limited.
It likely is not.
What would be interesting to know, however, is if
I can say that missing samples weren’t back filled when we billed. Never
had any complaints.
-Steve
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:31 PM Daniel Rohan wrote:
> Can anyone shed light on how ISPs handle missing samples when calculating
> p95s for monthly billing cycles? Do they fill null sample
a
host of other Internet pioneers, were there.
Steve
Yes thank you Saku! We’ve accounted for the fiber distance. We just want to
be able to quote the hardware latency. Thanks for verifying that Juniper; just
need the Tellabs... thank you:)
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 13, 2019, at 12:53 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> Hey Steve,
>
hardware latency, we don’t have a great means to test them
Thanks all!
Steve
AKA Too Big To Care. Happens a lot.
Steven Naslund
Chicago IL
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 11:36 AM Mike Hammett
mailto:na...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
Oh, you ordered cross connects for a PNI and they stopped responding
mid-project? Isn't that nice!
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
h
>And apparently fire. I wasn’t going to chime in but one of my >providers
>*just* alerted us to an electrical fire in a Minneapolis pop >causing loads to
>failover to ups. Unknown whether weather >conditions contributed to the
>incident.
Yes, in Chicago we will see an increase in home fires bec
Ironically you don’t really save a lot of energy when it’s this cold because
the loops are running at high speed and the humidification coils are working
overtime to keep the RH up in the room.
People think we can bring in all the outside cold we want but the issue then is
humidity stability.
>Exactly what he said. We actually run cooling and supplemental heating >in
>extreme cold. We need to keep the chiller pulling heat into itself and >pumps
>moving on high to keep the outdoor components from freezing >up. During the
>summer you might run close to or slightly below freezing >on
>To the 'infrastructure' question, I think the biggest concerns would >be power
>related. Although we have a DC in Buffalo that is cooled >on ambient outside
>air that has the opposite problem ; it's TOO cold >at the moment, so we are
>cycling most of the hot server exhaust >back into the comput
The main issue is infrastructure like power, cable damage, and heating/cooling
systems.
Power lines tend to go down because anything weak becomes brittle and any
accident involving a pole tends to cause them to break rather than absorb
impact. Also, conduits and manholes that normally might be
Sorry. Correction.
If it IS RFC compliant they should accept the attribute. If it is NOT, they
should drop (and maybe log it).
Steve
>Contact your hardware vendor. That is not acceptable behavior. If it is not
>RFC compliant they need to accept the attribute, if it's not RF
Agreed, do you think you will not see that attribute again now that the public
knows that you are vulnerable to this DoS method. Expect to see an attack
based on this method shortly. They just did you a favor by exposing your
vulnerability, you should take it as such. I would be putting in em
Contact your hardware vendor. That is not acceptable behavior. If it is not
RFC compliant they need to accept the attribute, if it's not RFC compliant they
should gracefully ignore it. Now we all know that anyone using that gear is
vulnerable to a DoS attack. Won't be long until anyone else
I hope you are as critical of your hardware vendor that cannot accept BGP4
compliant attributes or have you just not updated your code? You can black
hole anything you want but as long as the “Internet” is sending you an RFC
compliant BGP you better be able to handle it.
Steven Naslund
Chicago
ged
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
ietf-smtp lives at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp
Cheers,
Steve
There is no such thing as a fully RFC compliant BGP :
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/reference/standards/bgp.html
does not list 7606
Cisco Bug: CSCvf06327 - Error Handling for RFC 7606 not implemented for NXOS
This is as of today and a 2 second google search.. anyone
That's right. Check out www.west.com
So, your town will hire someone to put the systems in the 911 center and that
might be a company like West or say you are a local network provider doing VOIP
you could hire west to put in a gateway for you. State and local governments
can hire them to main
There are multiple ways this outage can impact CL 911 service not just related
to IP. Here are a few of them:
1. You have a POTS line and you dial 911 which gets to your central
office but the CO switch had no trunks out, either because they were TDM but
riding one of the optical carrie
So, to explain the whole system…..
1. From your location to the your serving CO would be IP, POTS, Cellular
however your normal phone call route.
2. From your CO to the CO(s) serving your 911 center. Might be a
dedicated trunk or may have high priority to seize channels within the n
This was a product available from the earliest Bell System days. You could
specify a couple of options. One is local path redundancy or diversity -
intended to get you to another central office and not use the same cable as
another specified circuit. A second option is called avoidance where
All true but it is becoming increasingly difficult to determine if a provider
is using another providers infrastructure (all are at some level). For
example, in the SIP world there are several national level carriers that are
using Level 3s core SIP network and if you were not aware of that you
A note for the guys hanging on to those POTS lines…It won’t really help. One
of our sites in Dubuque Iowa had ten CenturyLink PRIs (they are the LEC there)
homed off of a 5ESS switch. These all were unable to process calls during the
CenturyLink problem. The ISDN messaging returned indicated
They shouldn’t need OOB to operate existing lambdas just to configure new ones.
One possibility is that the management interface also handles master timing
which would be a really bad idea but possible (should be redundant and it
should be able to free run for a reasonable amount of time). The
I agree 100%. Now they need to figure out why bricking the management network
stopped forwarding on the optical side. > (Forgive my top posting, not on my
desktop as I’m out of town)
Steven Naslund
Chicago IL
>
>Wild guess, based on my own experience as a NOC admin/head of operations at a
>la
See my comments in line.
Steve
>Hey Steve,
>I will continue to speculate, as that's all we have.
> 1. Are you telling me that several line cards failed in multiple cities in
> the same way at the same time? Don't think so unless the same software fault
> was propa
Not buying this explanation for a number of reasons :
1. Are you telling me that several line cards failed in multiple cities in the
same way at the same time? Don't think so unless the same software fault was
propagated to all of them. If the problem was that they needed to be reset,
couldn
We see slow recovery. Dallas data service came back up, Dubuque voice service
still down.
Steven Naslund
Chicago IL
>
>Seems like things have stabilized as of about an hour ago for us.
>
1 - 100 of 943 matches
Mail list logo
