Matt Corallo writes:
> I see where you're going - blockchains are an audit log (eg Certificate
> Transparency) and cryptocurrencies generally use something expensive to
> perform anti-sybil to gate appending to the audit log, but allowing the
> largest ISPs to randomly assign or re-assign resource
ched
; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Debian <<>> MX dm.duke.edu @2620:0:691:dc57::12
;; global options: +cmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
~Seth
ng will no longer use IRR and only
accepts new paper LOAs. In the year 2024. I don't understand how anyone
can go backwards like that.
~Seth
scott via NANOG writes:
> What if someone originates a /15? That's one of the prefix sizes we
> originate. They need a 'less than or equal to' thingie in there.
I've asked the maintainer of this service (whom I recently met and who
might not be on NANOG) to clarify this.
Michael Thomas writes:
> I wonder if the right thing to do is to create a standards track RFC that
> makes the experimental space officially an add on to rfc 1918. If it works
> for you, great, if not your problem. It would at least stop all of these
> recurring arguments that we could salvage it
On 11/2/23 1:30 PM, goemon--- via NANOG wrote:
Are there any legitimate services running solely on .us domain names?
Yes.
Matthew Petach writes:
> I would go a step further; for any system of compression hoping to gain a
> net positive space savings,
> Godel's incompleteness theorem guarantees that there is at least one input
> to the system that will result in no space savings whatsoever.
This is rather the Pigeonh
On 9/29/23 10:24, VOLKAN SALİH wrote:
you guys become rich this way.. by playing penny pincher.
I asked global firms like Huawei, not some local company called ADAMS!
You joined the wrong mailing list then. This is NANOG, which has
companies of all sizes and private individuals operating n
without GPS or NTP being involved.
I used to jump through all the hoops for that but honestly I like the
appliances better (they are also PTP grandmaster clocks). I can always
disable the GPS inputs if any of the doom and gloom actually comes to pass.
~Seth
just under $10k.
Personally I'm just not that comfortable using random unknown platform
and unknown installation conditions time server pools over the big-I
internet. I would possibly consider NTP servers operated by entities I
have peering with.
~Seth
I also need someone at GGC to contact me ASAP; a tech showed up on site
to replace hardware in a node and I've come to find out my portal access
is no longer available and I can't place it into maintenance mode.
~Seth
Jan Schaumann via NANOG writes:
> Mark Stevens wrote:
> > Is anyone else getting the following error when trying to access any of
> > google's services?
> > SSL_ERROR_RX_RECORD_TOO_LONG
>
> Isn't this usually a sign of a protocol mismatch?
> I.e., TLS 1.3 vs TLS 1.2.
The most common protocol mi
On 6/1/22 8:12 PM, Mitchell Tanenbaum via NANOG wrote:
Believe it or not, there is cable within 500 yards, but they won’t
extend it. (:
50 feet across the street from me on the east side of the road is AT&T
FTTH territory. My side of the street is not. F the west side apparently.
On 5/23/22 12:00 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 5/23/22 11:49 AM, Aaron Wendel wrote:
The Fiber Broadband Association estimates that the average US
household will need more than a gig within 5 years. Why not just jump
it to a gig or more?
Really? What is the average household doing to use up
Disney+ started error 73'ing me and my customers again. Same as back in
November 2020. Hooray for breaking things that used to work.
I tried the chat method again, but unlike last time where they asked me
for IP ranges in chat, now I've been given a case number and someone is
supposed to email
Owen DeLong via NANOG writes:
> Just because there is a small code snippet you found that prevents casting
> 240/4 as unicast on an interface doesn’t mean that removing that code will
> magically make 240/4 usable in the entire stack.
>
> [...]
>
> The code you found may just be a safety valve
On 3/9/22 12:01 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
It's not just equipment vendors, it's ISPs. Here in Oregon, Frontier was
recently acquired by Ziply. They're doing massive infrastructure work
and recently started offering symmetrical gigabit FTTH. This is a brand
new greenfield PON deployment. No IPv6.
On 3/7/22 2:14 PM, Abraham Y. Chen wrote:
The cost of this software engineering should be minimal.
So basically no solution is offered to what is the showstopper for this
proposal, only a hand wave that it "should be" easy to fix (but that's
everyone else's problem). I mean, I believe this ha
John R. Levine writes:
> This still doesn't mean that screwing around with 240/4 or, an even worse
> 127/8 minus 127/24, is a good idea.
I hope you'll be slightly mollified to learn that it's actually 127/8
minus 127/16.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-127/
That's
John Levine writes:
> FWIW, I also don't think that repurposing 240/4 is a good idea.
As people will be aware, we have a different draft on this issue, so
I'm also going to pipe up here.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-240/
(Our draft offers no specific plan for ex
I also imagine (without data) that most DoS attacks continue to be
performed by botnets, using other people's connections, rather than
directly by their ultimate perpetrators. So, the most effective and
meaningful mitigation would be trying to clean up bots, and prevent
ongoing bot infections, rat
On 12/7/21 8:48 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
I can't imagine, as a percentage, a significant amount of voting ARIN
members give a crap about what happens with legacy resources.
If I had legacy resources I might, but I don't so it's an issue that I
bounce between fully ignore or don't see why I s
On 9/22/21 6:12 PM, Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE wrote:
If someone were to make us remove a redundant DWDM node, we’d charge them list
price to ever consider putting it back*, plus a deposit, plus our costs for the
removal in the first place. Bad move. Enjoy the $8million, it could c
On 8/19/21 11:19 AM, Ross Tajvar wrote:
I, and many others that I know, have successfully listed our networks in
PeeringDB while having no peering. You may just need to try again.
All of the argument is based around an email dated in *2015*. So yeah,
try again.
On 6/11/21 11:18 AM, Bryan Holloway wrote:
This is what I got from those guys ...
--
CoreSite Incident Notification
Description: During a planned maintenance event to integrate new
hardware into our MPLS core an extreme dip in Any2 traffic was observed.
After about 4 hours running in a deg
On 6/11/21 10:16 AM, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jun 2021, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Did Any2 LAX barf last night between about 1am and 8am Pacific time?
More like 00:00-7:45 (Pacific time).
Anyone know what broke, and why the IX was dead for nearly 8 hours?
This is our second recent issue with
Did Any2 LAX barf last night between about 1am and 8am Pacific time?
On 6/2/21 2:00 PM, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
The kind of WISP we have around here is one or more AP on a tower or
corn silo and that one tower will cover a huge area by line of sight.
There will be nothing like you describe as each AP has separate
frequency and therefore no conflict. The gear is m
What kind of local problem or network problems could cause a servfail
response from the authoritative ns?
I'm beginning to think this is a DNSSEC related problem, I'll ask on the
pdns-users list. I see it's asking for a DS record on
login.authorize.net.cdn.cloudflare.net when the neares
On 4/6/21 11:35 AM, Arne Jensen wrote:
login.authorize.net. is a CNAME, but does not have any A records itself.
This one returns A records:
; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Debian <<>> A login.authorize.net
@ns0210.secondary.cloudflare.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode
On 4/6/21 11:35 AM, Arne Jensen wrote:
Den 06-04-2021 kl. 19:50 skrev Seth Mattinen:
On 4/6/21 9:33 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Is anyone from authorize.net on here? You are publishing both an A
and CNAME record for login.authorize.net, and the CNAME points to
On 4/6/21 9:33 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Is anyone from authorize.net on here? You are publishing both an A and
CNAME record for login.authorize.net, and the CNAME points to
login.authorize.net.cdn.cloudflare.net which doesn't resolve.
Looks like this may be a cloudflare related issue
Is anyone from authorize.net on here? You are publishing both an A and
CNAME record for login.authorize.net, and the CNAME points to
login.authorize.net.cdn.cloudflare.net which doesn't resolve.
On 3/24/21 8:08 AM, Phineas wrote:
Chiming in as a somewhat-younger network engineer here (19) - I think
that Discord should be more widely considered and approved as an option
across the board here. I’m active on mailing lists, and while they work,
at the end of the day I’d much rather be usin
On 3/23/21 8:26 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 3/23/21 17:11, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Okay great for those apps, but if nobody tells me where the new action
is... how does that help me? With the list here at least it's on
NANOG's website and they tell you how to join in.
This feels l
On 3/23/21 7:40 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 3/23/21 16:34, Seth Mattinen wrote:
The problem with other "social" formats I've found is that they're
often an exclusive club you have to know about through connections or
be invited to. You can also be excluded on a whim.
Wha
On 3/22/21 11:22 PM, Cynthia Revström via NANOG wrote:
I haven't ever used facebook beyond receiving some invitation for an
event, and I feel like that's the most common case for people around my
age group. (not using Facebook that is)
Facebook has effectively become social media for old peop
On 3/22/21 7:00 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
TBH, most discussion in the WISP space has moved to Facebook. The busy
WISPA mailing lists used to get about 20k messages per year. When I last
checked, they were down to 5k or so and on a downward trend. Meanwhile,
the Facebook groups have exploded, bo
On 2/18/21 1:07 AM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
On that note, I'd be very interested in hearing stories of actual
incidents that are the cause of why cardboard boxes are banned in many
facilities, due to loose particulate matter getting into the air and
setting off very sensitive fire detection systems.
On 2/16/21 09:49, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 2/16/21 8:50 AM, John Von Essen wrote:
I just assumed most people in Texas have heat pumps- AC in the summer
and minimal heating in the winter when needed. When the entire state
gets a deep freeze, everybody is running those heat pumps non-stop,
and
On 1/26/21 3:51 AM, Siyuan Miao wrote:
Does anybody know if there's an alternative to Any2 Los Angeles
with predictable uptime and enough members in LA?
It's the second outage this month and we've observed at least 7 outages
in the past year and we didn't even receive any maintenance notice or
On 1/27/21 5:40 AM, Ryan Landry wrote:
If you haven't already, I encourage you to subscribe to Coresite's
maintenance notifications. Not sure it needs to be duplicated as a
notification service to nanog@.
I'm kind of curious what the actual problem is. I'm on Any2 in LA, but I
haven't been a
On 1/12/21 1:47 PM, John Curran wrote:
On 12 Jan 2021, at 12:40 PM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
And yet, Amazon will still happily sell you this item:
https://www.amazon.com/Anarchist-Cookbook-William-Powell/dp/1607966123/
In fact, it is listed as: #1 Best Seller in Anarchism
Thanks for the rem
On 1/10/21 4:00 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
sro...@ronan-online.com :
While Amazon is absolutely within their rights to suspend anyone they want for
violation of their TOS, it does create an interesting problem. Amazon is now in
the content moderation business, which could potentially open them
On 1/7/21 10:31 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
NOC tours seem like a very 1990's thing, that and 'datacenter tours'.
I still offer them because as a small company a lot of people think
unless you're $bigname that whatever a small company can possibly offer
is trash.
On 12/28/20 9:11 AM, Aaron Wendel wrote:
Actually our free service doesn't have limitations, has an SLA, no
time/term restrictions, a CPE, support, etc.
How do SLA refunds work on free service? Do you just pay them some cash
value instead of credits?
Matthew Crocker writes:
> I have many customers that have registered their domains against my
> authoritative servers (DNS-AUTH3.CROCKER.COM).I need to move that machine
> to a different network/IP address.I’ve made the updates in my domain
> (crocker.com) but I think I also need to upd
t help me through its auto response means
and get what I presume is a live person. However, even though I got
lucky with this method someone else reported they just got dead ended
with "what's an ISP" when they tried chat.
So the lesson here is to just keep trying the end user chat and phone
number until you get lucky.
~Seth
calling
in. Said they can't help without a subscriber account, nor escalate or
open a ticket.
~Seth
On 11/20/20 11:41 AM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
In other words: “oops, I shouldn’t have given out the secret e-mail addresses that
actually work."
I did try calling, and it's just an end user dead end.
~Seth
On 11/13/20 12:52 PM, Niels Bakker wrote:
* se...@rollernet.us (Seth Mattinen) [Sun 08 Nov 2020, 18:21 CET]:
I've had 74.118.152.0/21 allocated to me since 2005.
So many IPs in possession for so long, yet so little reverse DNS:
---
$ (for j in `jot 7 2`; do for i in `jot 255`; do
ery major streaming service *except* Disney+, so if you use them
you'll have to call to convince them you're not using a VPN."
This isn't even a new network, I've had 74.118.152.0/21 allocated to me
since 2005. Why people insist on reinventing the geolocation wheel is
beyond me.
~Seth
ontact that can actually help?
~Seth
On 10/13/20 8:04 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
If I had a dollar for every 'scary security alert' email received in a
NOC email inbox from a 'security researcher group' that is the results
of a port scan, or some small subset of trojan infected residential
endpoint computers attempting outbound connec
On 10/13/20 5:10 PM, Darin Steffl wrote:
You would do well to add them to your mix and remove one of the other
ones. I'd probably remove spectrum and replace with HE. We've only had
30 minutes of downtime total in 5 years so they've been very reliable
for us.
I removed Spectrum (Charter) a
On 9/27/20 18:33, Daniel Sterling wrote:
It is true that I've yet to see any FPS game use ipv6. I assume that's
cuz they can't count on users having v6, so they have to support v4, and
it wouldn't be worth their while to have their gaming host support
dual-stack. just a guess there
Xbox Live
what prefixes they are so those of us who are
proactive about such things can filter and do contact everyone Charter
peers with or where they use an upstream. I got faster responses that
way than with Charter directly.
~Seth
On 4/30/20 11:38 AM, Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG wrote:
Why isn't there a well-known anycast ping address similar to
CloudFlare/Google/Level 3 DNS, or sorta like the NTP project?
Get someone to carve out some well-known IP and allow every ISP on the
planet to add that IP to a router or BSD box s
Anyone from Nitel peering on here? The peer...@nitelusa.com address
listed in peeringdb just returns an O365 "The group peering only accepts
messages from people in its organization or on its allowed senders list"
error.
On 3/19/20 9:51 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
During this time, however, 'work from home' technology hasn't really
progressed along the same path, has it? So, "get to the vpn" is still
largely a process of getting packets across the wide internet and to
small locations (your enterprise), there's
On 3/17/20 10:03 AM, Mike Bolitho wrote:
We have two redundant private lines out of each hospital connecting back
to primary and DR DCs and a metro connecting everything together in each
region. But for things we do not own that are not hosted locally, what
are we supposed to do? We have to g
On 3/2/20 4:32 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
That said, I fear this is going to be a problem long term. A blind “no /24s”
filter is dangerous, plus it might solve all traffic issues. It is going to
take effort to be sure you don’t get bitten by the Law Of Unintended
Consequences.
As soon as
On 3/2/20 3:09 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Your routers, your decision.
But how much traffic are you sending TO Google? Most people get the vast
majority of traffic FROM Google. They send you videos, you send them
ACKs. Does it matter where the ACKs go?
A customer is complaining that dat
On 3/2/20 3:02 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
I would say it would be best to see if you can get a direct peer with Google
via the IX. I have done this with some of the ISPs I work with. It was no
additional cost since the physical connections are already in place and
actually was highly recommend
On 3/2/20 2:20 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
I believe Owen was referring here to Google's actions: that the disagg
is the antisocial behaviour and that transit providers (the people they
are paying) would be more tolerant of that antisocial behaviour than
would be peers (the people they are not pay
On 3/2/20 12:44 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
In part, it might be because people you’re not paying may be less tolerant of
anti-social behavior than people you are paying.
I'm not sure how I was being offensive but OK.
Anyone know why Google announces only aggregates via peering and
disaggregate prefixes over transit?
For example, I had a customer complaining about a path that was taking
the long way instead of via peering and when I looked I saw:
Only 172.217.0.0/16 over Any2 LAX
That plus 172.217.14.0/24
On 2/12/20 11:48, Josh Luthman wrote:
In low power state, usually standby, they're connected to the network
and listen for requests to download a new title (bought online) or
updates. I know on the Xbox One side of things this feature is semi-off
by default as it turns the HDD off to save powe
On 2/12/20 11:31, Livingood, Jason wrote:
But I think folks are correct that the issue may be more that a given gaming
device was turned off at night (though no reason that device could not
pre-cache the content from the source). In any case, there should be a better
way to address this. The I
On 2/12/20 10:02, Jared Mauch wrote:
When you see this please raise it to my attention. I can't promise a resolution
but will promise clarity in what is going on.
This was in May 2019 so what's done is done at this point, but I will
forward you the email offlist.
The wheels of bureaucracy are certainly a problem. The largest peer on
our local exchange couldn't even get Akamai to complete a peering turn
up because whoever was working on the ticket on the Akamai side got
stuck on trying to set up the wrong location. And then months pass, it
never got r
On 2/12/20 8:36 AM, Aaron Gould wrote:
Netflix oca has it figured out, as my fill windows is during off-peak time, 2
a.m. - 6 am. and I think it's also configurable in the oca portal.
It's not fill, it's that people don't turn on their xbox or whatever
until after they get home from work and
On 2/12/20 8:13 AM, Brandon Martin wrote:
It would be really nice if the major CDNs had virtual machines small
network operators with very expensive regional transport costs could
spin up. Hit rate would be very low, of course, but the ability to grab
some of these mass-market huge updates and
On 2/7/20 6:36 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
Hey there
I am looking for a contact in Charter for a 10G wave. Reno > SF or Reno
to > LA.
Please let me know if you know people who may help.
If you can get them to actually sell you a 10G. Last time I dealt with
Charter they maxed out at offering 5
On 1/17/20 02:13, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
From the web: the band 48 (3550-3700MHz) is for CBRS in US (Citizens'
band broadband service; I suppose something like voice between trucks)
CBRS (and the soon to be former NN band) doesn't have anything to do
with CB radios.
On 1/6/20 9:21 AM, Tom Beecher wrote:
"Property Tax Recovery" charges are also to my knowledge 100% optional
fees. It's the carrier charging you a fee so they can pay their property
taxes. Somehow, this sort of thing is legal.
I mean, it's legal if someone signed an agreement that says they a
On 12/31/19 8:10 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
Argumentation on the basis of a tu quoque fallacy doesn't really add
much to the dicussion. Depreciating potentialy dangerous and definitely
obsolete protocols does not make you a hypocrite.
Then how about privilege?
If someone is living in a less-priv
On 12/31/19 1:32 AM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
On 12/30/2019 8:32 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 12/30/19 8:22 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Is anyone from ntpd.org on here? You're pointing DNS at me for some
reason. That zone (ntpd.org) isn't in our system. Your NS looks odd
too, *.darkness-reig
On 12/31/19 12:50 AM, Ryan Hamel wrote:
Just let the old platforms ride off into the sunset as originally
planned like the SSL implementations in older JRE installs, XP, etc. You
shouldn't be holding onto the past.
Because poor people anywhere on earth that might not have access to the
newer
On 12/30/19 8:22 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Is anyone from ntpd.org on here? You're pointing DNS at me for some
reason. That zone (ntpd.org) isn't in our system. Your NS looks odd too,
*.darkness-reigns.net and .nl? Is that legit? I don't know what it was
before because I'
Is anyone from ntpd.org on here? You're pointing DNS at me for some
reason. That zone (ntpd.org) isn't in our system. Your NS looks odd too,
*.darkness-reigns.net and .nl? Is that legit? I don't know what it was
before because I've never looked, but that seems off.
~Seth
On 12/28/19 7:12 AM, Terrance Devor wrote:
Thank You Jorge! What is important for us is not to overpay That's
why auctions are really a last resort. Can someone please walk me
through this with a few links? This is my first time going through this
process.
Ask ARIN. They will help you.
On 12/24/19 8:03 AM, James Breeden wrote:
Yes. That's the ticket I've had open for 4 days. Do they not support IRR
based filtering? I think that's the hangup we're having...
No. Send them a list of prefixes and an LOA.
On 12/6/19 06:46, Fawcett, Nick via NANOG wrote:
We had three onsite Akamai caches a few months ago. They called us up
and said they are removing that service and sent us boxes to pack up the
hardware and ship back. We’ve had quite the increase in DIA traffic as
a result of it.
Same here
On 10/30/19 10:10 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 10/30/19 6:13 AM, John Von Essen wrote:
I too love RTG, been using it forever, appears to handle interfaces
all the way up 10G.
I still use RTG. Not for graphing or anything fancy, just for polling
counters in a database to be queried by other
On 10/30/19 6:13 AM, John Von Essen wrote:
I too love RTG, been using it forever, appears to handle interfaces all
the way up 10G.
I still use RTG. Not for graphing or anything fancy, just for polling
counters in a database to be queried by other things. It's still useful
for raw numbers f
On 10/13/19 8:58 AM, Stephen Satchell wrote:
In trying to research what would constitute "best practice", the papers
I found were outdated, potentially incomplete (particularly with
reference to IPv6), or geared toward other applications. This table
currently does not have exceptions -- some ma
On 10/11/19 07:16, Daniel Seagraves wrote:
This should not be just a “nitpick". AT&T announces our extremely legacy ARIN
allocation for us because we do not qualify to have an ASN, but I absolutely did not,
will not, and*have actively resisted attempts to* transfer the block to them. I would
On 10/3/19 5:34 PM, John Levine wrote:
In article
you write:
that gets me on to my small annoyance... /64 bit subnet masks for
local networks. really?
Yup.
Making everything is a /64 is the best because means never again having
to waste brain cycles on right-sizing subnets. And the total
On 10/3/19 13:13, Mark Andrews wrote:
On 4 Oct 2019, at 4:35 am, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 10/2/19 15:03, Naslund, Steve wrote:
In my experience, the biggest hurdle to installing a pure IPv6 has nothing to
do with network gear or network engineers. That stuff I expect to support v6.
This
On 10/2/19 15:03, Naslund, Steve wrote:
In my experience, the biggest hurdle to installing a pure IPv6 has
nothing to do with network gear or network engineers. That stuff I
expect to support v6. This biggest hurdle is the dumb stuff like
machinery interfaces, surveillance devices, the must h
On 9/2/19 15:02, Masataka Ohta wrote:
then applying that very same standard of
evidence to your assertions leads directly to "can safely be ignored"
As I already wrote:
> The following page by Geoff Huston is better than your delusion.
> http://www.potaroo.net/ispcolumn/2001-03-bgp.html
>
On 8/5/19 10:05 AM, William Herrin wrote:
The best cure for speech is more speech. The President notwithstanding,
hateful behavior has a hard time surviving the light of day. You
shouldn't be the censor but you can shine the light.
That doesn't seem to work on Facebook, where people spew the
On 7/22/19 10:16 AM, William Herrin wrote:
Respectfully John, this wasn't a DBA or an individual figuring the org
name field on the old email template couldn't be blank. A class-A was
allocated to a _purpose_. You've not only allowed but encouraged that
valuable resource to be reassigned to a
On 7/19/19 6:33 AM, Matt Harris wrote:
After reading the analogy above regarding spectrum space, I shudder to
think what the community response would be if the FCC were to tacitly
allow the ARRL to receive several million (or billion in this case)
dollars from, say, Verizon in exchange for so
On 7/18/19 6:54 AM, Robert Webb wrote:
Manager has no issue with equipment purchased and has polled the other
tenants in the same data center and they are also OK with it. He has
just cited that there is some standard but has not been forthcoming with
any documentation.
Never heard of su
On 7/16/19 4:30 PM, Ken Gilmour wrote:
TBs of data is not really that much data on average when you average it
over thousands of customers. The data is summarized, There are a ton of
other things happening in the background that I've already explained in
the thread and are really irrelevant to
On 7/16/19 10:53 AM, Akshay Kumar via NANOG wrote:
Then you are "doing it wrong(tm). Good luck.
Are you saying that anyone choosing not to use "the cloud" is simply
wrong because "cloud" is always right?
On 6/20/19 7:16 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
The problem you're running into, Prasun, is that people either aren't
actually reading what you're saying or have poor comprehension skills.
Very few people are directly addressing what you're asking.
A good question would be, who actually cares about r
On 5/20/19 4:26 PM, John Kristoff wrote:
On Mon, 20 May 2019 23:09:02 +
Seth Mattinen wrote:
A good start would be killing any /24 announcement where a covering
aggregate exists.
I wouldn't do this as a general rule. If an attacker knows networks are
1) not pointing default, 2) dro
1 - 100 of 738 matches
Mail list logo
