On 3/2/20 2:20 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
I believe Owen was referring here to Google's actions: that the disagg
is the antisocial behaviour and that transit providers (the people they
are paying) would be more tolerant of that antisocial behaviour than
would be peers (the people they are not paying).
I suppose that one went over my head.
To clarify I am the one with peering in LAX and I'm only seeing the big
aggregates via the Any2 Easy servers. At the moment I can only infer
that Google announces aggregates to the route servers and maybe one only
gets the /24's after you turn up a direct neighbor or PNI, but there's
no way to do that since Google isn't accepting new peering requests and
steers such requests back to what's available on route servers.
I suppose what I could do is filter /24's from 15169$ in the absence of
being able to see if a direct/PNI peering would include them where route
servers do not.
