Re: emily postnews

You sure :-)^oo mh 28 octobre 2023 19:32 "Jay R. Ashworth" a écrit: > - Original Message - > >> From: "Randy Bush" >> >> another old dog doing a search wrote to tell me they really appreciated >> that i still had some antique advice up. i had long forgotten this one. >> but found it a

Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions

+1 mh 10 mars 2022 16:34 "jim deleskie" mailto:deles...@gmail.com?to=%22jim%20deleskie%22%20)> a écrit: I respect the people and goals here, but strongly echo Mel's statement. This is a much larger hammer then mail filtering lists. -jim On Thu, Mar 10, 2022, 11:26 AM Mel Beckman mailto:m...

Re: Telecommunications network drafting software

TikZ ?  mh De : Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG Envoyé : mercredi 1 septembre 2021 20:30 À : NANOG Objet : Telecommunications network drafting software Hello folks, Would you care to share some pointers to drafting software which you use to draw up architect

Re: Perhaps it's not time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?

I agree. mh 20 mars 2021 19:57 "John Levine" a écrit: > It appears that Mike Hammett said: > >> -=-=-=-=-=- >> >> That seems like a reasonable proposal. NANOG-OffTopic, NANOG-Discuss, >> NANOG-BizDev, NANOG-xyz, >> something (more more than one something). > > Having been around this barn a

Re: cloud automation BGP

Hi Shared appreciation!! (and observation). Cheers, mh 29 septembre 2020 17:16 "Simon Leinen" a écrit: > Randy Bush writes: > >> have folk looked at https://github.com/nttgin/BGPalerter > > We use it, and have it configured to send alerts to the NOC team's chat > tool (Mattermost). Seems pr

Re: Centurylink having a bad morning?

While conserving connectivity? 😂 De : Shawn L via NANOG Envoyé : mercredi 2 septembre 2020 13:15 À : nanog Objet : Re: Centurylink having a bad morning? We once moved a 3u server 30 miles between data centers this way.  Plug redundant psu into a ups and 2 peopl

Re: Bgpmon alternatives?

RIS Live API is a choice for this. mh Le 16 juin 2019 à 13:21, à 13:21, Brian Kantor a écrit: >That would be wonderful. Thank you! > - Brian > > >On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 03:59:29AM -0700, Mike Leber wrote: >> I'm sure if it doesn't do exactly that already, we can add it >shortly. >> >> So

Re: A Deep Dive on the Recent Widespread DNS Hijacking

Le 2019-02-26 11:04, Sander Steffann a écrit : Op 26 feb. 2019, om 10:56 heeft Bill Woodcock het volgende geschreven: We need to get switched over to DANE as quickly as possible, and stop wasting effort trying to keep the CA system alive with ever-hackier band-aids. +1 Sander +1 mh

Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers

Le 2019-02-12 20:56, Nick Hilliard a écrit : Matthew Walster wrote on 12/02/2019 19:27: I'm actually of the opinion that the whole "PKI" part of RPKI is the bit that really needs to die. I'll claim a de-facto godwin if anyone mentions the word "blockchain". Nick https://www.google.fr/search

Re: Best practices on logical separation of abuse@ vs dmca@ role inboxes

Le 2018-08-06 16:03, Jérôme Nicolle a écrit : Hi Jack, Le 05/08/2018 à 21:51, na...@jack.fr.eu.org a écrit : By "appropriate place", you mean "the trash bin" ? Nope, that would eat-up storage and IOs. The proper destination is /dev/null, unless they provide you with the required informations

Re: Impacts of Encryption Everywhere (any solution?)

Le 2018-06-17 12:40, na...@jack.fr.eu.org a écrit : Well, yes, there is, you simply have to break the end to end encryption Yes, (or) deny service by Policy (remains to evaluate who's happy with that). Cheers, mh On 06/17/2018 03:09 AM, Matthew Petach wrote: Except that if websites are s

Re: Impacts of Encryption Everywhere (any solution?)

Morocco... Sure? Data points? mh Le 2018-05-29 20:00, Owen DeLong a écrit : It was a convenient example with which I had experience near Eritrea. My statement would apply equally for say, Zambia or Morocco. Owen On May 29, 2018, at 10:58 , Eric Kuhnke wrote: Ethiopia is significantly dif

Re: Opinions on intent-based networking

BGP? :-) mh Le 2018-05-29 20:32, LF OD a écrit : Been following the articles on "intent-based" networking from Cisco and other vendors for a couple years now, and I have a basic grasp of the concept of "define your goals/outcomes and automation will make it so", but I do not know the practical

Re: list blockchain

:-) mh Le 2018-01-28 05:52, Randy Bush a écrit : why is no one exploring converting this mailing list to a blockchain? major missed opportunity. randy

Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing?

Message - From: "Michael Hallgren" To: "William Herrin" Cc: "NANOG" Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 4:56:21 PM Subject: Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing? By the way, RIPE still seems to provide fresh /22s to new LIRs. Same in the ARIN region? mh Le 4 janv.

Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing?

By the way, RIPE still seems to provide fresh /22s to new LIRs. Same in the ARIN region? mh Le 4 janv. 2018 à 23:50, à 23:50, William Herrin a écrit: >On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Justin Wilson wrote: > >> I know of dozens, if not hundreds of small ISPs that can’t >participate in >> BGP beca

Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing?

Thanks Bill. Kinda ugly, but OK I see... Prefer v6 ;-) mh Le 4 janv. 2018 à 23:17, à 23:17, William Herrin a écrit: >On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Michael Hallgren wrote: > >> Am I missing something? What's the trigger for doing tunneling here? >> > >With &q

Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing?

Le 2018-01-04 20:16, Job Snijders a écrit : On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 at 20:13, Filip Hruska wrote: I have stumbled upon this site [1] which seems to offer /27 IPv4 leasing. They also claim "All of our IPv4 address space can be used on any network in any location." I thought that the smallest pref

Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing?

Le 2018-01-04 20:27, Harald Koch a écrit : "IPv6 available upon request. " LOL. +1 :-) mh

Re: What's the point of prepend communities?

Yes, sometimes very much so, and often nice to combine with local-pref settings based on upstream's "geo-community-values" when available. Cheers, mh Le 1 nov. 2017 à 18:59, à 18:59, Leo Bicknell a écrit: >In a message written on Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 07:56:43PM +0100, Micha

Re: What's the point of prepend communities?

Hi guys, But keep in mind that 'prepend communities' are fragile: I decide by local preference whereto I send my traffic. Cheers, mh Le 30 oct. 2017 à 18:25, à 18:25, Leo Bicknell a écrit: >In a message written on Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 01:54:17PM -0600, Clinton >Work wrote: >> I believe that Ja

Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp

Le 16/09/2017 à 10:39, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr a écrit : > Hi, > > My advice is not to mix IGPs. If you are already running ISIS, then go for > multi-topology and dual-stack it. > > I've done that several times, running different backbones, works like a > charm. Less overhead as you'd only be run

Re: Moving fibre trunks: interruptions?

Le 02/09/2017 à 21:25, Baldur Norddahl a écrit : > That depends on the country. Here in Denmark it is not possible to get > rights to put up any aerial at all. The cost difference is irrelevant when > you have no option but to put it in the ground. > > Not only is there no new aerial installations

Re: Moving fibre trunks: interruptions?

Aerial's not that rare in Europe (rural areas, sometimes even close to metro). Cheers, mh Le 01/09/2017 à 21:52, Rod Beck a écrit : > I don't think there is virtually any aerial in Europe. So given the cost > difference why is virtually all fiber buried on this side of the Atlantic? > > > __

Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

Hi, What IGP features do you need, and for what reason? Cheers, mh⁣​Le 10 nov. 2016, à 23:04, Josh Reynolds a écrit: I didn't "trash talk" a vendor. If I did, it would be a multi-thousand line hate fueled rant with examples and enough colorful language to make submarine crews blush. Cisco has

Re: nested prefixes in Internet

Hi Martin, What do you want to do? Move from A to B or add A to B? Cheers, mh Le 27 sept. 2016 17:52, à 17:52, Mel Beckman a écrit: >Precisely. This is how it's done by providers I've worked with. > > -mel beckman > >> On Sep 27, 2016, at 7:06 AM, Roy wrote: >> >> >> >> Option 3? >> >>

Re: Inferring the location points of traffic exchange between two networks

Le 13/01/2016 18:36, Reza Motamedi a écrit : > Hi NANOG, > > I am researcher at the University of Oregon and my question is rather > primitive. My research background is in networked systems and Internet > measurement so I know how things work in theory. > > My question is about BGP and what can be

Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality

Le 27/02/2015 23:19, Owen DeLong a écrit : > Any website which does not violate the law. > > In other words, if a lawful takedown order So, subject to legal control rather than simply administrative. Right? mh > has been applied to a website, this code can’t be used to force an ISP to > provid

Re: Checkpoint IPS

Le 05/02/2015 14:28, Terry Baranski a écrit : > On 5 Feb 2015, at 08:13, Michael Hallgren wrote: >> Sure they will give you pretty graphs of script-kiddie attempts but >> that's just the noise in which the skilled attack will get lost. No, Terry, I didn't write that !

Re: Checkpoint IPS

With pleasure! Yes, too long time... TTYS, mh > > > -jim > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Terry Baranski > mailto:terry.baranski.l...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > On 5 Feb 2015, at 01:56, Michael Hallgren wrote: > > Le 04/02/2015 17:19, Roland Dob

Re: Checkpoint IPS

Le 05/02/2015 13:57, Terry Baranski a écrit : > On 5 Feb 2015, at 01:56, Michael Hallgren wrote: >> Le 04/02/2015 17:19, Roland Dobbins a écrit : >>> Real life limitations? >>> https://app.box.com/s/a3oqqlgwe15j8svojvzl >> Right ;-) Among many other nice one

Re: Checkpoint IPS

Le 05/02/2015 08:01, Roland Dobbins a écrit : > On 5 Feb 2015, at 13:51, Michael Hallgren wrote: > >> So, need another inspection strategy I think. > The real question is, why 'inspect', at all? Yes, that's an even mo

Re: Checkpoint IPS

Le 04/02/2015 17:19, Roland Dobbins a écrit : > On 2 Feb 2015, at 19:53, Michael Hallgren wrote: > >> Real life limitations? > <https://app.box.com/s/a3oqqlgwe15j8svojvzl> Right ;-) Among many other nice ones, I like: `` ‘IPS’ devices require artificially-engineered topo

Re: Checkpoint IPS

Le 04/02/2015 17:07, Eugeniu Patrascu a écrit : > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Michael Hallgren <mailto:m.hallg...@free.fr>> wrote: > > Le 03/02/2015 16:21, Eugeniu Patrascu a écrit : >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Michael Hallgren >> mai

Re: Checkpoint IPS

Le 03/02/2015 16:21, Eugeniu Patrascu a écrit : > On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Michael Hallgren <mailto:m.hallg...@free.fr>> wrote: > > Hi, > > Someone has positive or negative experience running > Checkpoint IPS cluster over ``long distance'&

Checkpoint IPS

Hi, Someone has positive or negative experience running Checkpoint IPS cluster over ``long distance'' synch. network? Real life limitations? Alternatives? Timers? Cheers, mh

Re: DDOS solution recommendation

Le 11/01/2015 14:50, Patrick W. Gilmore a écrit : > I agree with lots said here. > > But I've said for years (despite some people saying I am confused) that BCP38 > is the single most important thing we can do to cut DDoS. > > No spoofed source means no amplification. It also stops things like Kam

Re: DDOS solution recommendation

Le 11/01/2015 14:50, Patrick W. Gilmore a écrit : > I agree with lots said here. > > But I've said for years (despite some people saying I am confused) that BCP38 > is the single most important thing we can do to cut DDoS. > > No spoofed source means no amplification. It also stops things like Kam

Re: Anyone else having trouble reaching thepiratebay.se? AS39138

Le 26/11/2014 18:51, Dominik Bay a écrit : > On 11/26/2014 06:41 PM, Javier J wrote: >> Its reachable from some places and not others. > Maybe a partial outage. >From France: mh@home:~$ mtr --report thepiratebay.org Start: Wed Nov 26 23:09:31 2014 HOST: homeLoss% Snt La

Re: Multicast Internet Route table.

Le 02/09/2014 18:05, Mikael Abrahamsson a écrit : > On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Octavio Alvarez wrote: > >> I have never used interdomain multicast but I imagine the global >> m-routing table would quickly become large. > > I have set up interdomain routing connecting both to a few peers and a > Tier1 tran

Re: Urgent

Le 19/08/2014 16:08, William Herrin a écrit : > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Michael Hallgren wrote: >> Le 18/08/2014 20:38, Jeroen van Aart a écrit : >>>>>> -Original Message- >>>>>> Contact for God, please reach out to me offli

Re: Urgent

Le 18/08/2014 20:38, Jeroen van Aart a écrit : > Scott Weeks wrote: >> -Original Message- Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist. Regards, -AS666 NOC >> -- >> >> >> ASN 666 is the US army. I was curious a long time ago

Re: Muni Fiber and Politics - ENDGAME

Le 22/07/2014 20:34, Mikael Abrahamsson a écrit : > On Tue, 22 Jul 2014, Jay Ashworth wrote: > >> You can assume $8-1200 per passing, if you fiber the entire town at >> once (my example was 12000 passings, 3-pr, in 2.3 sqmi). Then you're >> going to have to operate the core, which will take power

Re: Net Neutrality...

Le 16/07/2014 17:45, Eric Brunner-Williams a écrit : > On 7/16/14 7:50 AM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote: >> Relevant article by former FCC Chair >> >> http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/07/14/this-is-why-the-government-should-never-control-the-internet/ >> > > It reads like a hit piece

Re: Help with Confederation-RR-MPBGP

rarely had a lab for these kind of things, but quite often networks :-) Cheers, mh > > On Thursday, June 12, 2014 2:45 PM, Michael Hallgren > wrote: > > > > Le 12/06/2014 18:39, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu > <mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu> a écrit : >

Re: Help with Confederation-RR-MPBGP

Le 12/06/2014 18:39, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu a écrit : > On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 09:25:20 -0700, Philip Lavine said: >> need some guidance on best practices > > What the vendor says is best practices, or what people in the trenches say? > >> Is it more efficient to use RR or Confederation? > > If optio

Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)

Le 03/05/2014 20:23, Mikael Abrahamsson a écrit : > On Sat, 3 May 2014, Vitkovský Adam wrote: > >> Sure it's a different transport protocol altogether, anyways It's >> interesting to see how everybody tends to separate the IPv4 and IPv6 >> AFs onto a different TCP sessions and still run the plethor

Re: misunderstanding scale

Le 22/03/2014 23:49, Nick Hilliard a écrit : > On 22/03/2014 19:35, Justin M. Streiner wrote: >> CGN also comes with lots of downside that customers are likely to find >> unpleasant. For some operators, customer (dis)satisfaction might be the >> driver that ultimately forces them to deploy IPv6. >

Re: BGP multihoming with two address spaces

Le 29/01/2014 20:34, Owen DeLong a écrit : >> This sort of local-pref default seems to be a common practice with >> backbones. It's very annoying. I wish they'd stop. > Most of their customers would actually be very unhappy if they stopped. This > local-pref default prevents many many problems and

Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes

Le 15/01/2014 07:59, Eric A Louie a écrit : > Ok, so the right way to do it is in iBGP. That pretty much answers the > question - don't redistribute those ixp-participant prefixes into my IGP. Yes, using next-hop self (rather than importing IXP routes) as pointed out earlier in this thread. > >

RE : Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches

+1, I fully agree. And not only concerning the "domestic" use by country, but also with regards to "information peering" with neighbors, and such.  Enjoy '14!  mh Message d'origine De : Ray Soucy Date : A : Blair Trosper Cc : "nanog@nanog.org list" Objet : Re: NSA able

Re: prefix filtering per IRR - practices

Le 22/11/2013 17:57, Chris Rogers a écrit : > From my experience, networks that are capable of filtering from IRR objects > generally filter for exact routes, meaning no "le 24". Hi, Are you sure? My experience is, with a small number of exceptions, that "le 24" ('route' or 'route-set,' sometime

Re: Fundamental questions of backbone design

Le 18/10/2013 20:03, Anurag Bhatia a écrit : > Hello everyone > > > I have some fundamental questions about backbone design. Feel free to point > me to any discussions/presentation material related to these questions. > > > >1. As I understand it's (sort off) common practice to give highest >

Re: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 11/10/2013 19:41, joel jaeggli a écrit : > > On Oct 11, 2013, at 10:27 AM, William Waites wrote: > >> I'm having a discussion with a small network in a part of the world >> where bandwidth is scarce and multiple DSL lines are often used for >> ups

Re: Someone from PCCW NOC here ?

Le 02/10/2013 19:43, Christopher Morrow a écrit : > I am shocked that a pccw customer isn't being prefix-filtered. Ohhh, they're rare bird? ( I'd hope so, rare bird; and I do strongly agree that (at least) these birds -- customer-routes -- should live in a transparent community... IRR (well...),

Re: common method to count traffic volume on IX

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 17/09/2013 20:15, Patrick W. Gilmore a écrit : > On Sep 17, 2013, at 12:11 , Martin T wrote: > >> Thanks for all the replies! >> >> >> Nick, >> >> counting traffic on inter-switch links is kind of cheating, isn't it? >> I mean if "input bytes" and

Re: common method to count traffic volume on IX

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 17/09/2013 20:15, Patrick W. Gilmore a écrit : Hi, Good reading, to get an idea: https://www1.ethz.ch/csg/people/dimitroc/papers/p95pam.pdf Section 3, mainly. Cheers, mh -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Com

Re: Internet Surveillance and Boomerang Routing: A Call for Canadian Network Sovereignty

Le 09/09/2013 21:16, Joe Abley a écrit : > On 2013-09-09, at 14:29, joel jaeggli wrote: > >> On 9/9/13 7:43 AM, Jason Lixfeld wrote: >>> That notwithstanding, it's stupid to send traffic to/from one of the >>> large $your_region/country incumbents via $not_your_region/country. >>> It's just not go

Re: Is the FBI's DNSSEC broken?

Le 03/09/2013 23:28, John Levine a écrit : >>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:27:36PM +, John Levine wrote: I don't claim to be a big DNSSEC expert, but this looks just plain wrong to me, and unbound agrees, turning it into a SERVFAIL. > I heard back, seems like I found someone at the FBI

Re: huawei

Le 13/06/2013 18:22, Randy Bush a écrit : >> I've always wondered about thatwould you know that the Huawei is >> leaking data? > yes. they have a contract to leak it to the NSA :-) mh >

Re: PRISM: NSA/FBI Internet data mining project

Le 09/06/2013 20:26, Rob McEwen a écrit : > Dan, > > I doubt anyone can answer your question easily because you seem to have > contradictions in your scenario. At one point you say: > >> private company to collect information about terrorist entities, who >> in turn privately contracts with the top

RE : Re: PRISM: NSA/FBI Internet data mining project

Yet appears a certain lack of transparency, no?  mh  Message d'origine De : "Jason L. Sparks" Date : A : ku po Cc : NANOG Objet : Re: PRISM: NSA/FBI Internet data mining project To be fair, the reporting (initially) claimed the providers were granting the USG "access

Re: PRISM: NSA/FBI Internet data mining project

Le 07/06/2013 19:10, Warren Bailey a écrit : > Five days ago anyone who would have talked about the government having this > capability would have been issued another tin foil hat. We think we know the > truth now, but why hasn't echelon been brought up? I'm not calling anyone a > liar, but isn'

Re: Tier1 blackholing policy?

Le 01/05/2013 14:46, David Miller a écrit : > On 05/01/2013 05:40 AM, Thomas Schmid wrote: >> Joel, >> >> Am 30.04.2013 18:00, schrieb joel jaeggli: >>> On 4/30/13 8:23 AM, Thomas Schmid wrote: On 30.04.2013 17:07, Chris Boyd wrote: > On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 10:59 -0400, ML wrote: >> 1)

Re: "It's the end of the world as we know it" -- REM

Le 24/04/2013 21:35, Lee Howard a écrit : > > On 4/24/13 2:45 PM, "ML" wrote: > >> On 4/23/2013 5:41 PM, Valdis Kletnieks wrote: >>> I didn't see any mention of this Tony Hain paper: >>> >>> http://tndh.net/~tony/ietf/ARIN-runout-projection.pdf >>> >>> tl;dr: ARIN predicted to run out of IP space

Re: Visio-fu

Le 25/02/2013 23:15, Warren Bailey a écrit : > I've seen smart draw. I wish these drawing software companies would port > their application over to mac.. Every big design guy I know is a mac fanboy, > Adobe has it figured out but smart draw and visio have no excuse. Omni is > about the only thin

Re: Visio-fu

Le 25/02/2013 23:06, Josh Baird a écrit : > Check SmartDraw. pstricks, metapost, TikZ (pgf),... mh > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:04 PM, George Herbert > wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:58 PM, George Herbert >> wrote: >>> [...] >>> My company has a Visio whiz, who I'm going to ping for h

Re: How are operators using IRR?

Hi, Some of the networks close to me, use IRR based AS_PATH and prefix filters at customer-route import. Needless to say that running periodic diffs between what's found in IRR and what's received in RW and discuss the results with customers is a necessary good thing to make sure that what is exp

Re: RFC becomes Visio

a free Visio plugin/viewer for Internet > Explorer. > > > http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?displaylang=en&id=21701 > Can you also edit/write using these? mh > > --- > > Brian Raaen > > Zcorum > > > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:43 PM

Re: RFC becomes Visio

Le mardi 02 octobre 2012 à 23:25 +0200, Dan Luedtke a écrit : > On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 19:31 +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > Here's a visio diagram you can send them: > > > > http://www.foobar.org/~nick/bgp-network-diagram.vsd > > Is there a .png version of it somewhere? > The whole thread made my

RE: IRR-clueful person at 3356?

Yes, usually something like "accept r/n" iff "there is a route object 'covering' r/n and the 'origin AS' of r/n is in the AS-set of the neighbor AS. mh -Message d'origine- De:Mike Simkins Envoyé: 17/08/2012, 18:04 A: jle...@lewis.org; r...@seastrom.com Cc: nanog@nanog.org Objet:Re: IRR-c

Re: LinkedIn password database compromised

Hi Randy, Le jeudi 07 juin 2012 à 10:03 -0700, Randy Bush a écrit : > hi etaoin, > > > I still don't want single sign on. Not anywhere. > > i believe that 'single sign on' is a bad deal and dangerous for all, not > just we geeks. essentially it means that the 'identiry provider' owns > your id

RE: Industry practice for BGP costs - one time or fixed/monthly?

Le vendredi 25 mai 2012 à 16:04 +, Ashish Rastogi a écrit : > Price is probably for high availability and high SLA standards. Yes, hopefully not for simple BGP route exchange...! :) mh > > Ashish Rastogi > > > From: Anurag Bhatia [m...@anuragbhatia.

Re: IPv6 aggregation tool

Le mardi 22 mai 2012 à 14:02 -0400, Rafael Rodriguez a écrit : > :) thanks! Was wondering how to do that. $ perldoc Net::IP ;) That doc's a fine one to read also for other reasons. Cheers, mh > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 21, 2012, at 9:36, Stefan Jakob wrote: > > > Am 04.05.12 03:35,

Re: Programmers with network engineering skills

Le lundi 27 février 2012 à 14:14 -0800, Owen DeLong a écrit : > On Feb 27, 2012, at 12:31 PM, david raistrick wrote: > > > On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, Owen DeLong wrote: > > > >> I think you're more likely to find a network engineer with (possibly > >> limited) > >> programming skills. > > > > While I

Re: Hijacked Network Ranges

Le dimanche 05 février 2012 à 22:41 -0800, goe...@anime.net a écrit : > On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Christopher Morrow wrote: > > why aren't filters applied at all? > > filters don't generate revenue. ... but at times, they prevent loss of... ... mh > > -Dan >

Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org

Le mercredi 04 janvier 2012 à 20:18 +, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com a écrit : > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 03:10:13PM -0500, George, Wes wrote: > > > From: Wessels, Duane [mailto:dwess...@verisign.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 1:41 PM > > > Subject: Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.

Re: Ok; let's have the "Does DNAT contribute to Security" argument one more time...

Le lundi 14 novembre 2011 à 15:43 -0600, -Hammer- a écrit : > There really is no winner or "right way" on this thread. In IPv4 as a > security guy we have often implemented NAT as an extra layer of > obfuscation. In IPv6, that option really isn't there. So it's a cultural > change for me. I'm no

Re: DPI deployment use case

Le samedi 08 octobre 2011 à 05:57 +0900, Randy Bush a écrit : > > Actually, we've been faced with proposals to build services based on > > traffic classification, like e.g. "access our own webmail and all > > social networking sites, but not skype and video" > > you're on the wrong list. this lis

Re: Need the perspective of a Level3 customer.

Le vendredi 13 mai 2011 à 01:39 -0700, Joe Renwick a écrit : > Can anyone peering with Level3 directly tell me if they are seeing > 63.210.162.0/24 coming from the Level3 peer? Yes, I do. mh > > Thanks for the help. > > Cheers, >

Re: Downstream Usage-BGP Communites

Le mardi 10 mai 2011 à 17:52 -0400, Nick Olsen a écrit : > Greetings NANOG, > Was hoping to gain some insight into common practice with using BGP > Communities downstream. > > For instance: > We peer with AS100 (example) > AS100 peers with TW Telecom (AS4323). > Since I happen to know that AS100

Re: Anyone still maintaining altdb.net?

Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 à 10:05 -0500, Richard A Steenbergen a écrit : > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:30:44AM -0400, Jon Lewis wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Bret Palsson wrote: > > > > > I submitted my objects April 11. the mtrner object needs to be > > > created by the db-admin. I realize this

Re: Regional AS model

Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 à 02:09 -0700, Zaid Ali a écrit : > On Mar 24, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Michael Hallgren wrote: > > > Le jeudi 24 mars 2011 à 14:26 -0700, Bill Woodcock a écrit : > >> On Mar 24, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > >>> On Mar 24, 20

Re: Regional AS model

Le jeudi 24 mars 2011 à 14:26 -0700, Bill Woodcock a écrit : > On Mar 24, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > > On Mar 24, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: > >> On Mar 24, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Zaid Ali wrote: > >> > >>> I have seen age old discussions on single AS vs multiple AS for b

Re: What If....

Le lundi 28 février 2011 à 11:57 -1000, David Conrad a écrit : > On Feb 28, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Michael Hallgren wrote: > >>> I'm glad to see they are up to date: > >>> "Paper submissions should > >>> include a three and one-half inch >

Re: What If....

Le lundi 28 février 2011 à 15:50 -0500, Edward Lewis a écrit : > At 9:35 +1300 3/1/11, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > >> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/frnotices/2011/fr_ianafunctionsnoi_02252011.pdf > > >I'm glad to see they are up to date: > >"Paper submissions should > >include a three and one-half in

Re: A top-down RPKI model a threat to human freedom? (was Re: Level 3's IRR Database)

Le mardi 01 février 2011 à 18:01 -0500, Christopher Morrow a écrit : > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Michael Hallgren wrote: > > Le mardi 01 février 2011 à 12:14 -0500, Christopher Morrow a écrit : > > >> countries do not have RIR's, countries have NIR's... regi

Re: A top-down RPKI model a threat to human freedom? (was Re: Level 3's IRR Database)

Le mercredi 02 février 2011 à 07:04 +0900, Randy Bush a écrit : > > In this context, at least, perhaps the NIR should be considered > > superfluous or redundant? What is the operational rationale behind the > > NIR level? Wouldn't a flatter RIR-LIR structure do just fine? > > and then, by inferenc

Re: A top-down RPKI model a threat to human freedom? (was Re: Level 3's IRR Database)

Le mardi 01 février 2011 à 16:54 -0500, Martin Millnert a écrit : > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Michael Hallgren wrote: > > But RIR is (at least supposed to be) regional, so > > (hopefully) more stable from a policy point of view (since the number of > > national "st

Re: A top-down RPKI model a threat to human freedom? (was Re: Level 3's IRR Database)

Le mardi 01 février 2011 à 13:20 -0800, Owen DeLong a écrit : > On Feb 1, 2011, at 9:14 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Martin Millnert wrote: > >> Here be dragons, > > > >> It should be fairly obvious, by most recently what's going on in > >> Egypt, why allo

Re: A top-down RPKI model a threat to human freedom? (was Re: Level 3's IRR Database)

Le mardi 01 février 2011 à 12:14 -0500, Christopher Morrow a écrit : > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Martin Millnert wrote: > > Here be dragons, > > > It should be fairly obvious, by most recently what's going on in > > Egypt, why allowing a government to control the Internet is a Really > >

Re: Single AS Number for multiple prefixes in different country

Le lundi 17 janvier 2011 à 12:00 -0800, Michel de Nostredame a écrit : > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore > wrote: > > On Jan 17, 2011, at 12:32 AM, Michel de Nostredame wrote: > > I do not think that paragraph means what you think it means. > > I've seen my own AS in full tab

Re: Cisco Sanitization

Le mercredi 12 janvier 2011 à 11:41 -0800, JC Dill a écrit : > Randy, > > If you want to cite list policy, let's start by noting that it's a clear > violation of the nanog list AUP to setup an autoresponder reply to list > email[1], no matter if the autoresponder replies to the list or just to

Re: Mastercard problems

Le mercredi 08 décembre 2010 à 14:23 -0800, andrew.wallace a écrit : > "MasterCard works closely with the > U.S. Secret Service, the FBI, the Postal Inspection Service, Interpol, > Europol and counterpart organizations throughout the world to facilitate > investigation and prosecution." > > htt

Re: regional ASN's

Le mercredi 01 décembre 2010 à 17:31 +, deles...@gmail.com a écrit : > You can use one AS and communities to seperate your traffic/policies. Or other iBGP means of internal separation, like BGP confederations (in order to avoid iBGP session hacks). mh > > -jim > --Original Message--

Re: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)

Le samedi 06 novembre 2010 à 13:29 -0700, Matthew Petach a écrit : > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:22 PM, George Bonser wrote: > >> > > >> > Last week I asked the operator of fairly major public peering points > >> if they supported anything larger than 1500 MTU. The answer was "no". > >> > > >> > >>

Re: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)

Le samedi 06 novembre 2010 à 13:01 -0700, Matthew Petach a écrit : > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:32 PM, George Bonser wrote: > >> I doubt that 1500 is (still) widely used in our Internet... Might be, > >> though, that most of us don't go all the way to 9k. > >> > >> mh > > > > Last week I asked the

RE: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)

Le samedi 06 novembre 2010 à 12:15 -0700, George Bonser a écrit : > > Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 9:45 AM > > To: nanog@nanog.org > > Subject: Re: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-) > > > > On 11/5/2010 5:32 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: > > > > > > It's really quiet in here. So, for

Re: What must one do to avoid Gmail's overachieving spam filtering?

Le mercredi 29 septembre 2010 à 16:31 -0500, Daniel Seagraves a écrit : > On Sep 29, 2010, at 4:08 PM, Ryan Hayes wrote: > > > Can you please not use the word "retarded" in a pejorative sense? > > The word "please" is probably not required, since using that word in this > manner is prosecutable

Re: IPv6 enabled carriers?

t me in month > 11 of trying to turn up a dual-stack circuit because they refuse to read > the order and keep putting it in Sacramento (v4 only) when it needs to > go to San Jose (dual-stack). Sprint wasn't on your list, but they are > rolling out native IPv6 support on all of 1239.

  1   2   >