Le mercredi 04 janvier 2012 à 20:18 +0000, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com a écrit : > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 03:10:13PM -0500, George, Wes wrote: > > > From: Wessels, Duane [mailto:dwess...@verisign.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 1:41 PM > > > Subject: Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org > > > > > > > > > The brief problem in accessing www.nanog.org was due to numerous > > > parallel > > > downloads of a large video file by a single source IP address. We have > > > no reason to believe it was malicious in intent, but the offender has > > > been > > > blocked anyway. > > > > [WEG] In the lovely CGN future, not only will you see this type of behavior > > (multiple pulls from the same IP) all of the time, your response to block > > it would have taken tens or hundreds of users out of service simultaneously. > > /troll > > > > Not meant to fault your response, merely to point out yet one more way that > > CGN is likely to break things where an assumption of 1 IP = 1 > > user/host/network exists. > > > > Wes George > > Hum... thats not how I read Duanes response at all.. I thought they > blocked > the (excessively) large video file from download... :)
Depends of how we (are supposed to) interpret ``the offender has been blocked anyway'' :) Cheers, mh > > /bill >
