Le mercredi 02 février 2011 à 07:04 +0900, Randy Bush a écrit : > > In this context, at least, perhaps the NIR should be considered > > superfluous or redundant? What is the operational rationale behind the > > NIR level? Wouldn't a flatter RIR-LIR structure do just fine? > > and then, by inference, what is the use of the RIR level?
A meeting point for communities, potentially able to reflect a consensus view of policies and moderate "NIR" and other might be more unilateral initiatives. If one individual of a community goes "insane", enable the remaing ones to modrate. > > randy mh
