Identify L2 control protocols which will require transparent tunneling end to
end before making a decision on underlay tech. Beware of multiple vendor
handoffs / NNIs under the hood of any solution, but especially an "oMPLS"
solution.
From: NANOG on behalf of
Rabbi Rob now has multiple contacts he can work with at Internet2.
Jeff
--
Jeff Bartig
Interconnection Architect
Internet2 [AS11164](https://as11164.peeringdb.com) / AS11537
+1-608-616-9908
jbar...@internet2.edu
On 26 Oct 2024, at 14:00, Rob Thomas via NANOG wrote:
Dear team,
Does anyone
This seems like a total misuse of the RFC framework / process and more a grab
at publicity, but I'll play along...bogon. You should include the term
"bogon". Someday when I'm done keeping actual production networks alive, I may
wade into the morass of IETF & IEEE and work on trimming the fat..
peers and transit. If we can get our router vendors to implement
it, [RFC9234 - Route Leak Prevention and Detection Using Roles in UPDATE
and OPEN Messages](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9234/) is a much
better tool for this problem. Thanks for your work on this RFC.
Jeff
--
Jeff Bartig
Take a look at linksecured.net, you may have to ask, they offer promo pricing
in various locations for single servers. For single server they only charge
power costs up to 4U and you can get IPMI/DRAC/BNC dedicated IP.
-j
From: NANOG on behalf of Michael
Spears via NANOG
Repl
I am. Shoot me a message offline on what you need and I can put you in contact
with our peering coordinator.
Thanks,
-Jeff
> On May 20, 2024, at 5:21 AM, Nick Olsen wrote:
>
> Anyone with a clue from 5650 monitoring this list?
>
> I'm in the process of turning up a new
That’s the default domain for Exchange Online and Microsoft Azure AD
identities. If the tenant is branded, it may show which company or organization
that the onmicrosoft.com domain is associated to when someone tries to login to
it with an application that is using Azure AD for SAML/OpenID conne
> > William Herrin wrote:
Until they tamper with it using localpref, BGP's default behavior with prepends
does exactly the right thing, at least in my situation.
I feel your pain Bill, but from a slightly different angle. For years the
large CDNs have been disregarding prepends. When a source
Dennis, let me see if I can get someone to reach out to you to get this sorted
out. Can you PM me the circuit IDs and ASN/Prefix info please?
Thanks,
-Jeff
> On Nov 20, 2023, at 9:53 AM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
>
> I have two frontier circuits that are not working correctly
Junos doesn't maintain an intermediate BGP table / RIB as you would see on
other Cisco-like platforms. Therefore you need to build comm-string actions
into your neighborship policies.
JTAC says we must disable a physical port to allocate BW for tunnel-services.
Also leaving tunnel-services bandwidth unspecified is not possible on the 204.
I haven't independently tested / validated in lab yet, but this is what they
have told me. I advised JTAC to update the MX204 "port-chec
-Original Message-
From: Delong.com
Sent: Monday, October 2, 2023 5:47 PM
To: behrnsj...@yahoo.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: MX204 tunnel services BW
> “Tunnel gets whatever bandwidth is left after physical port packets are
> processed” and likely some additional overhead for
Encountered an issue with an MX204 using all 4x100G ports and a logical
tunnel to hairpin a VRF. The tunnel started dropping packets around 8Gbps.
I bumped up tunnel-services BW from 10G to 100G which made the problem
worse; the tunnel was now limited to around 1.3Gbps. To my knowledge with
Trio
We have also used https://www.shrubbery.net/tac_plus/ for some time as
well. Great product!
JM
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 8:15 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 9/20/23 17:09, Bryan Holloway wrote:
>
> > Ah, the good old days when I could download the latest tac_plus code
> > from the Cisco FTP site
FRR fix went into 9.0 and has been back ported to 8.5 and 8.4 , Cumulus 5.6
will include the fix.
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Aug 30, 2023, at 5:32 AM, Mark Prosser wrote:
>
> Thanks for sharing this, Mike. I saw it on lobste.rs yesterday and figured
> everyone would be ahead.
>
> I
features is not helpful,
coding (or at least testing) and contributing is.
Cheers,
Jeff
> On May 8, 2023, at 9:51 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/8/23 18:45, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>> Broken when talking to Cisco IOS XE. Catalogued here:
>>
>> https://lis
All fixed (thanks Donald)
CVE-2022-40302 and CVE-2022-40318: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/12043
CVE-2022-43681: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/12247
Cheers,
Jeff
> On May 3, 2023, at 2:52 AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>
> On 02/05/2023 17:56, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
If you are looking for BGP in DC (either unicast and/or VPN) we (Jeff Doyle and I) have published a significant number of podcasts on “between 0x2 nerds”(from basic BGP to EVPN to BGP security to HW) - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMYH1xDLIabuZCr1Yeoo39enogPA2yJB7Cheers,JeffOn Apr 27, 2023
For what it's worth, on Spectrum Residential here in LAX and I can reach
ip6echo.net and Google's public ipv6.google.com sites via residential
service... I have my own modems and routers, which may make the
difference in my case... Spectrum does indicate that IPv6 my need to be
enabled on thei
David, reply to me off list and I will see if I can help you out.
Thanks,
-Jeff
> On Apr 19, 2023, at 9:21 AM, David Hubbard
> wrote:
>
> Have spent 90 minutes with tech support trying to get a peering issue a few
> hundred miles away in front of the right department, and all
rizon for that! I can blame them for a
little UDP congestion there, but that's probably normal.
Thanks to everyone for their suggestions. At least they helped
eliminate suspects.
--
Jeff Woolsey {{woolsey,jlw}@jlw,first.last@{gmail,jlw}}.com
Nature abhors straight antennas, clean lenses,
nt, Equinix). It
also occurs on my Verizon phone data connection (not WiFi). If he were
serving more stuff out of his home, this would be a bigger problem.
--
Jeff Woolsey {woolsey,jlw}@{jlw,jxh}.com first.last@{gmail,jlw}.com
Spum bad keming.
Nature abhors a straight antenna, a clean le
FRR hasn’t implemented RFC4364 (nor planning to my knowledge (unless someone
comes and codes it ;-))
I believe - Arccus has implemented it (Keyur to confirm).
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Feb 26, 2023, at 22:58, Paul Rolland wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 17:46:42 -0300
You might want to search for “policy based add-path”, same idea (BGP listener + flow collector), different issue (60M+ entries BGP RIB), all clouds use some version of that, not sure about open sourcing it though Cheers,JeffOn Jan 6, 2023, at 17:00, Mike Hammett wrote:Right.Only I'm not the guy t
Freertr folks have just published (I didn’t look into the details of their implementation though):“rare/freertr just got fib compression.. in our nren, the v4 table can be compressed from 900k to 260k, the v6 table from 160k to 52k... the tofino2 asic with our dataplane code ( https://lnkd.in/dJrHV
them p2p.
Hope this is helpful.
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Nov 30, 2022, at 07:51, Graham Johnston wrote:
>
> Good day.
>
> I'm curious to hear from those with direct, hopefully in-production,
> experience in using a commercial network operating system vendor along
> wi
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 11:15 AM wrote:
> juniper.net down?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Aaron
>
> aar...@gvtc.com
>
>
>
Website is up from AS12044 (Oregon) at 11:25am Pacific.
--
Jeff Shultz
--
Like us on Social Media for News, Promotions, and other informatio
Link to Arista article about their Spotify deployment (2016), has all the relevant links, can be implemented on variety of vendors https://aristanetworks.force.com/AristaCommunity/s/article/spotifys-sdn-internet-routerCheers,JeffOn Oct 10, 2022, at 15:57, Ryan Rawdon wrote:On Oct 10, 2022, at 6:3
logic and re-injection of
routes into BGP RIB
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Oct 10, 2022, at 09:26, William Herrin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 8:37 AM Mike Hammett wrote:
>> Feasibility of adding some middleware that culls unneeded routes (existing
>> more specific and aggrega
Looking at the fix, Donald has only removed IPV4_CLASS_DE(a) uint32_t)(a))
& 0xe000) == 0xe000)
validation but kept INADDR_ANY.
I’ll bring up RFC6286 to him
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Sep 12, 2022, at 13:41, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Jeff Tantsura writes:
>
>> Indeed, s
Indeed, someone was recently complaining that FRR is unhappy with a peer with
router-id from class E range…
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Sep 9, 2022, at 09:30, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Sept 2022 at 09:31, Crist Clark wrote:
>
>> As I said in the original email, I realize route
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-grow-as-path-prepending
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Aug 25, 2022, at 11:00, Tom Beecher wrote:
>
>
>
>> Usually What shoud we do ? Should we filter it ?
>
>
> As with many things, the answer depends on your situation.
&g
ribed, we have line rate pre-classifiers do proper drops based on WAN
queue priority.
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Aug 9, 2022, at 16:34, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
>
>
> Saku,
>
> I have forwarded your questions to Sharada.
>
> All,
>
> For this week – at 11:00am PST, T
ain architects of Broadcom DNX (Jericho/Qumran/Ramon). Cheers,Jeff From: Saku YttiSent: Friday, August 5, 2022 12:15 AMTo: Jeff TantsuraCc: NANOG; Jeff DoyleSubject: Re: 400G forwarding - how does it work? Thank you for this. I wish there would have been a deeper dive to the lookup side. My o
Broadcom DNX (Jericho/Qumran/Ramon)
For both - the guests are main architects of the silicon
Enjoy
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 5:06 PM Jeff Tantsura wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
>
>
> This is not an advertisement but an attempt to help folks to better
> understand networking HW.
>
>
>
Hey, This is not an advertisement but an attempt to help folks to better understand networking HW. Some of you might know (and love 😊) “between 0x2 nerds” podcast Jeff Doyle and I have been hosting for a couple of years. Following up the discussion we have decided to dedicate a number of upcoming
FYI
https://community.juniper.net/blogs/nicolas-fevrier/2022/07/27/voq-and-dnx-pipeline
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Jul 25, 2022, at 15:59, Lincoln Dale wrote:
>
>
>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 11:58 AM James Bensley
>> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 15:34, Lawren
, INT, local optimizations are primary users of it.
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Jul 25, 2022, at 15:59, Lincoln Dale wrote:
>
>
>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 11:58 AM James Bensley
>> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 15:34, Lawrence Wobker wrote:
>> > Th
plated proposals
>> will be viewed with skepticism. While a proposal may have a lower total
>> cost of ownership over decades, the business case is the cheapest for
>> the first 10 years of subsidies. [massive over-simplification]
>>
>> Historically, these projects
Lumen / Level3 filtergen is trimming these routes now. Don't bother trying
to query filtergen.level3.net currently; server is full. Small AS cone does
not equal small societal footprint & impact. While I appreciate the
intention upthread of proxy registering at ATLDB, it really just distracted
f
optimized)
implementation.
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Apr 1, 2022, at 11:10, Adam Thompson wrote:
>
>
> TL;DR: Yes, go ahead, they’re good, we like them.
>
> I won’t say they’re perfect, but we’re using them at the edge (two of them in
> a hybrid core/edge model right now, even!
IOS- XR and Junos (don’t know about others) expose service level APIs that
allow offbox best path selection and consequently injecting these back into RIB.
FRR is in process of implementing customized best path using lua scripts.
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Mar 16, 2022, at 16:15, Anurag Bhatia wr
) the remote
> > DSLAM was definitely a separate piece of equipment, right, joined
> > to a shared subscriber pair with passive splitters?
> >
>
> I have absolutely no idea, but if I had to guess it is the same voltage
> as the local loop but I suppose they could use ring
o power since they already have the battery backup requirements for
> POTS. The setup they have here is a DSLAM and SIP->POTS termination in a
> pedestal with fiber backhaul. They use the old copper that used to go back
> to the CO to power the pedestal.
>
> Mike
>
>
’ business doing ok.
How’s life on your side?
Would love to meet, lunch or so?
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Jan 16, 2022, at 13:19, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
>
>
> Plane IP underlay works real well, I’m yet to see tangible proof of TE in DC
> (outside of niche HPC/IB cases).
> SR in DC - with o
for MPLS WAN/DCI.
Here’s an example of end2end architecture that works really well -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bookham-rtgwg-nfix-arch/
Geneve (there are some quirks as you get into implementing it) is another
example of a well designed overlay encap.
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Jan
crappy protocol, moving to
SR-MPLS makes all the sense.
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Jan 15, 2022, at 11:50, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 1/15/22 19:22, Colton Conor wrote:
>>
>> True, but in general MPLS is more costly. It's available on limited
>> devices, fr
with just a presentation.
Please let me know if you have got any questions.
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Dec 17, 2021, at 12:27, Matt Harris wrote:
>
>
>
> Matt Harris
> |
> Infrastructure Lead
> 816‑256‑5446
> |
> Direct
> Looking for help?
> Helpdesk
some cases POT.
Finally - there are public Microsoft presentations how we use IPinIP encap to
traverse a particular path on wide radix ECMP fabrics.
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Nov 12, 2021, at 07:55, Adam Thompson wrote:
>
>
> Hello all.
> Over time, we've run into occurrences of
notebook as a sign there is an expired domain
somewhere affecting whatever you have going wrong.
--
Jeff Shultz
--
Like us on Social Media for News, Promotions, and other information!!
<https://www.facebook.com/SCTCWEB/>
<https://www.instagram.com/sctc_sctc/>
<
t is quickly
> re-claimed and paid up again.
>
> queries for bar.com suddenly show up as "this domain is
> available" due to foo.com (which provides DNS for bar.com)
> having briefly gone into the expired state. Users of bar.com
> are (rightly) confused, as bar.com w
ared.
Anything I could say about my opinion of that might be actionable, or at
least inflammatory, so I'll stop now. The original problem has been
corrected.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 1:40 PM Stephane Bortzmeyer
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 01:28:07PM -0800,
> Jeff Shultz wrote
Never mind, looks like an expired domain issue. Someone didn't remind
someone else.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 1:28 PM Jeff Shultz wrote:
> Okay, so this is anecdotal, but since the domain belongs to me it's more
> than a little annoying.
>
> I got some calls that one of my
, and found I'm good through 2023. They pulled
up DNS checker and found that a bunch of DNS servers were showing
208.91.197.132 as the IP for the domain. It's actually in 64.130.197.x .
I'm wondering if I was the only one?
--
Jeff Shultz
--
Like us on Social Media for News, P
stand your playbook. It may
> be from snow day to all hands on deck. Test it at least once, and ideally
> with someone who will challenge a few assumptions (eg: that the cell
> network will be up)
>
> - Jared
--
Jeff Shultz
--
Like us on Social Media for News, Promot
129.134.30.0/23, 129.134.30.0/24, 129.134.31.0/24. The specific routes covering
all 4 nameservers (a-d) were withdrawn from all FB peering at approximately
15:40 UTC.
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Oct 4, 2021, at 22:45, William Herrin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 6:15 PM Michael Thom
ree burns beyond that.
>>
>> Maybe they’ll get one or two independent secondary authoritatives, so
>> this doesn’t happen again. :-)
>>
>
>
> We have had dns back for a while here but the site is still down. Not
> counting this as over yet.
>
>
>
>
ebook.com. IN A
>
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> www.facebook.com. 3420IN CNAME
> star-mini.c10r.facebook.com.
> star-mini.c10r.facebook.com. 6 IN A 157.240.19.35
>
> ;; Query time: 13 msec
> ;; SERVER: 9.9.9.9#53(9.9.9.9)
> ;; WHEN: Mon Oct 04 23:20:4
, toolset is there.
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Aug 14, 2021, at 06:21, Masataka Ohta
> wrote:
>
> Baldur Norddahl wrote:
>
>> For all the stub networks out there we should be able to aggressively
>> filter routes without much harm.
>
> Stub networks, which, by definitio
All I know is that I am getting a lot fewer bogus calls on my cell phone
than I was this time last month.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021, 06:17 Ryan Finnesey via NANOG wrote:
> This should help with Robo calls a lot.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG On
> Behalf Of Sean Donelan
> Sent: Wednesda
On 6/2/21 04:44, Peter Kristolaitis wrote:
On 2021-06-02 4:25 a.m., Mark Tinka wrote:
On 6/1/21 20:46, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
How about the farmer using an HD or 4k drone with WAPs on his center
pivot irrigation sprinklers to monitor crops? Or monitor the cattle
herd that is currently growin
buffers might be helpful here, DCI/DC-GW is another case where
deep buffers could be justified.
Regards,
Jeff
> On Apr 9, 2021, at 05:59, Dmitry Sherman wrote:
>
> Once again, which is better shared buffer featurerich or fat buffer switches?
> When its better to put big buffer
That'll work. :-)
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 2:10 PM Sabri Berisha wrote:
> - On Mar 10, 2021, at 1:41 PM, Jeff Shultz
> wrote:
>
> The OVH datacenter is (was) in France. I bet you 10 bucks that the
>> fire department was on strike.
>
> Report I saw had the
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Fire Department was there in under five minutes.
>
> I assume your Enron DC was in the U.S.?
>
> The OVH datacenter is (was) in France. I bet you 10 bucks that the
> fire department was on strike.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sabri
>
--
Jef
with your lack of etiquette or
sense of decorum. We all agreed to the rules, and we should all act
accordingly.
JeffP
je...@jeffp.us
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:34 PM Javier J
wrote:
> Why are you emailing me?
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:54 PM Jeff P wrote:
>
>> SEE!?!
>>
ICYMI: Amazon's response to Parler Antitrust relief:
https://cdn.pacermonitor.com/pdfserver/LHNWTAI/137249864/Parler_LLC_v_Amazon_Web_Services_Inc__wawdce-21-00031__0010.0.pdf
JeffP
je...@jeffp.us
m pretty sure the cat was the culprit for a tech call last week,
fortunately resolvable over the phone.
--
Jeff Shultz
--
Like us on Social Media for News, Promotions, and other information!!
<https://www.facebook.com/SCTCWEB/>
<https://www.instagram.com/sctc_503/>
For DNS fundamentals - I’d definitely recommend DNS deep dive we have recorded
at IETF108.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DV0q9s94RL8
Cheers,
Jeff
On Nov 21, 2020, 8:49 AM -0800, NANOG News , wrote:
> Career Opportunities In Network Engineering
> “Be curious and passionate; this is a li
Yes, per the support team, ISP and end-users would go throuh the same initial
point of contact to report issue so they may properly track and redirect as
appropriate. Thank you.
-- Original Message --
From: "Brian Turnbow" mailto:b.turn...@twt.it>>
To: "Jeff
On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 7:25 PM
To: Jeff Mansukhani mailto:j...@mansukhani.net>>
Cc: Nanog@nanog.org<mailto:Nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Disney+ Geolocation (again)
I updated our page. :-)
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent C
Specifically for Network Operators, you may email
techops-distribut...@disneystreaming.com for technical issues relating
to Disney+. Hope this helps.
Thanks
J
-- Original Message --
From: "Seth Mattinen"
To: "Nanog@nanog.org"
Sent: 11/8/2020 9:20:17 AM
Subject: Re: Disney+ Geolocati
Jay, I previously ran the engineering org over there, so sent this to my old
team to look at, including the best engineer I know in regard to the RADs. Will
pass along anything they come back with.
Thanks,
-Jeff
> On Nov 6, 2020, at 8:59 AM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
>
> We have a stra
mpleted as dialed.
Announcement for switch 3 0 dash 2.)
Any publicly available numbers or tech support just leads me in circles. I
figure if I keep at it long enough, I'll collect the whole set of their
toll free numbers... but I'd prefer not to.
Thanks!
--
Jeff Shultz
Central Office Techn
YANG is the right direction.
OpenConfig BGP and policy models are supported by every vendor on the earth.
We are finalizing IETF BGP and policy models
draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model is about to be last-called
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model is pretty much ready
Cheers,
Jeff
On Nov 5, 2020, 4:57 AM -0800
Hi Thomas,
We had a similar discussion on FRR slack, there are some duplicates indeed.
Are you planing to test FRR at some point in time?
Cheers,
Jeff
On Oct 21, 2020, 3:58 PM -0700, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG
, wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> I confirmed your case and took a look at the co
I was awake when it struck, and I received this alert about 3 seconds
before the shockwave hit my location:
[image: EQ1.jpg]
My phone was isolated from the shockwave due to it being in my hands at the
time, for what it's worth.
JeffP
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 1:40 PM Sean Donelan wrote:
> The V
MPLSoUDP is not the technology you should be looking at, SRoUDP (RFC8663) is.
draft-bookham-rtgwg-nfix-arch describes an architecture that makes use of it to
provide an end2end SR path.
Cheers,
Jeff
On Sep 17, 2020, 9:32 AM -0700, James Bensley ,
wrote:
>
>
> On 17 September 2020 11:0
Randy,
Was meant as the reply to Aaron’s comment about VPN’s over non MPLS underlay,
not the encryption of it (which is orthogonal).
Cheers,
Jeff
On Sep 15, 2020, 12:59 PM -0700, Randy Bush , wrote:
> > GRE, VXLAN or any other tunneling encap of the day.
> > As long as next-
GRE, VXLAN or any other tunneling encap of the day.
As long as next-hop could be resolved behind remote end
Regards,
Jeff
> On Sep 15, 2020, at 11:14, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I'm still learning, but, It does seem interesting that the IP layer
>> (v6) ca
I have described what SR is, not what vendors (for variety of reasons) do with
it, hence “could” ;-)
As a side note - SRoUDP works seamlessly over either v4 or v6.
Regards,
Jeff
> On Sep 10, 2020, at 12:35, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 10/Sep/20 10:40, Jeff Tantsura
end architectures, e.g.
draft-bookham-rtgwg-nfix-arch.
There is SFC related work, draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr.
And there’s whole SRv6 thingy...
Let me know if I can help in any way.
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Sep 10, 2020, at 08:10, aar...@gvtc.com wrote:
>
> Interesting... I've never
BCP38 is an RFC, 2827.
It is a grand advise if you can:
-find someone who is actually well versed
-afford that someone.
Personally - when in early 2000s I had to write complete community tagging
design for a multi country network, I wish I had a “how to”
Regards,
Jeff
> On Sep 9, 2020, at
Great excuse ;-)
Regards,
Jeff
> On Sep 9, 2020, at 15:16, Mike Hammett via NANOG wrote:
>
>
> If history has taught us anything, everything we do will be ignored by those
> that most need it. :-)
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing
Robert,
This is not whether you should do it, but, should you have decided to, how to
do it in the best possible way, without making mistakes someone else has made
and learnt from.
Regards,
Jeff
> On Sep 9, 2020, at 11:40, Robert Raszuk wrote:
>
>
> And use of BGP without
don’t’s wrt inter-domain communities use.
I really enjoyed the difference RFC7938 (Use of BGP for Routing in Large-Scale
Data Centers) made, literally 100s of companies have used it to educate
themselves/ implemented their DC networking.
Cheers,
Jeff
>> On Sep 9, 2020, at 10:04, adam via
perhaps when we get to a
critical mass, codification would be a natural process, rather than
artificially enforcing people doing stuff they don’t see value (ROI) in,
discussion here perfectly reflects the state of art.
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Sep 8, 2020, at 17:57, Douglas Fischer via NANOG wr
Aaron,
Out of curiosity - if you are interested in SR, where are you getting your
information from if not IETF (SPRING)?
As for history - we (at Redback) have published 1st draft describing SR-MPLS
data plane in 2003 (LDP control plane).
Regards,
Jeff
> On Sep 6, 2020, at 09:53, Saku Ytti
We appeared to be impacted with some address space within 206.47.0.0/16
which AS577 normally advertises, but that was between 15:50 and 16:30
Eastern.
Jeff
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020, 10:48 PM Clinton Work wrote:
> We saw a bunch of our IP blocks hijacked by AS10990 from 19:15 MDT until
> 20:
> Who said anything about boxing your tooling in to SDN tech? You
> described Software Defined Networking as a rabbit hole and snake oil.
> It isn't. It's a class of tools in the networking toolbox and an
> increasingly useful one.
My toolbox in the garage has torque wrenches and allen wrenches a
f data science: product marketability is a
> good predictor of stock price.
>
>
I'd refine it slightly - the market's _impression_ of product marketability
is a good predictor of stock price.
That would include Mel's exceptions, I believe.
--
Jeff Shultz
--
Like us
tried opening tickets with our transit providers - but that is
going no where
Thanks
Jeff
Yippe. Just when you think things cant get worse, they sink deeper.
What's the over/under on the first synchonized dance video from the
top of Everest?
Bonus points if it includes surgical masks.
--
Jeff Shultz
--
Like us on Social Media for News, Promotions, and other information!!
they should be and get hazard pay.
>
> They help protect everyone's fiber and cables and pipes that go boom.
>
>
--
Jeff Shultz
--
Like us on Social Media for News, Promotions, and other information!!
<https://www.facebook.com/SCTCWEB/>
<https://www.ins
IP phones and VPN access)
and the office, and the boss is in or out on his own call. And we all
have boxes of gloves.
One of the workerbees does the majority of fiber hanging, and he'll
come in in the morning to do the day's worth of that if needed when
he's on his "home&q
rits-just-a-little/
>
>
>
> Relatively well prepared for a hurricane hit, but
> prepared for a comet hit? Haven't started that
> prep yet... ;-)
>
> scott
Really only one way to prep for a comet hit: Proper stretching so you
can kiss yourself... goodbye at the appropriate moment.
-
toration support to critical communications
> > infrastructure facilities."
> >
> > It is NOT a general purpose, ignore anything or go anywhere letter.
> >
> > Do NOT abuse the courtesy or no one will extend the courtesy.
--
Jeff Shultz
Central Office
You don't have a PUC?
http://www.puc.state.pa.us/filing_resources/filing_complaints.aspx
8 months exceeds my friendly contact limit.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, 18:41 Matt Hoppes
wrote:
> Does anyone have a contact for Frontier Central PA OSP contact?
>
> There is a line that has been down for over
t responsibility to take steps to ensure the smooth functioning of
> > the internet during the battle against the virus propagation."
> >
> > https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/19/tech/netflix-internet-overload-eu/index.html
> >
> > - Mike Bolitho
> >
> >
--
ds to run as a router,
> even if all I want from it is to be an AP. You can guess who long mine
> have gone without a software update, then...
>
> Who knows why people come up with the BS they do?
>
> Mark.
--
Jeff Shultz
--
Like us on Social Media for News, Promotions, and
t; thing would have been to eliminate the caps a decade ago.
>
--
Jeff Shultz
--
Like us on Social Media for News, Promotions, and other information!!
<https://www.facebook.com/SCTCWEB/>
<https://www.instagram.com/sctc_503/>
<https://www.yelp.com/biz/sctc-s
1 - 100 of 741 matches
Mail list logo
